Cargando…
Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment
Decision makers in adult social care are increasingly interested in using evidence from research to support or shape their decisions. The scope and nature of the current landscape of adult social care research (ASCR) need to be better understood. This paper provides a bibliometric assessment of ASCR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv022 |
_version_ | 1782448107403870208 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, David Côté, Grégoire Grant, Jonathan Knapp, Martin Mehta, Anji Morgan Jones, Molly |
author_facet | Campbell, David Côté, Grégoire Grant, Jonathan Knapp, Martin Mehta, Anji Morgan Jones, Molly |
author_sort | Campbell, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decision makers in adult social care are increasingly interested in using evidence from research to support or shape their decisions. The scope and nature of the current landscape of adult social care research (ASCR) need to be better understood. This paper provides a bibliometric assessment of ASCR outputs from 1996 to 2011. ASCR papers were retrieved using three strategies: from key journals; using keywords and noun phrases; and from additional papers preferentially citing or being cited by other ASCR papers. Overall, 195,829 ASCR papers were identified in the bibliographic database Scopus, of which 16 per cent involved at least one author from the UK. The UK output increased 2.45-fold between 1996 and 2011. Among selected countries, those with greater research intensity in ASCR generally had higher citation impact, such as the USA, UK, Canada and the Netherlands. The top five UK institutions in terms of volume of papers in the UK accounted for 26 per cent of total output. We conclude by noting the limitations to bibliometric analysis of ASCR and examine how such analysis can support the strategic development of the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4985733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49857332016-08-22 Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment Campbell, David Côté, Grégoire Grant, Jonathan Knapp, Martin Mehta, Anji Morgan Jones, Molly Br J Soc Work Articles Decision makers in adult social care are increasingly interested in using evidence from research to support or shape their decisions. The scope and nature of the current landscape of adult social care research (ASCR) need to be better understood. This paper provides a bibliometric assessment of ASCR outputs from 1996 to 2011. ASCR papers were retrieved using three strategies: from key journals; using keywords and noun phrases; and from additional papers preferentially citing or being cited by other ASCR papers. Overall, 195,829 ASCR papers were identified in the bibliographic database Scopus, of which 16 per cent involved at least one author from the UK. The UK output increased 2.45-fold between 1996 and 2011. Among selected countries, those with greater research intensity in ASCR generally had higher citation impact, such as the USA, UK, Canada and the Netherlands. The top five UK institutions in terms of volume of papers in the UK accounted for 26 per cent of total output. We conclude by noting the limitations to bibliometric analysis of ASCR and examine how such analysis can support the strategic development of the field. Oxford University Press 2016-07 2015-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4985733/ /pubmed/27559228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv022 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Articles Campbell, David Côté, Grégoire Grant, Jonathan Knapp, Martin Mehta, Anji Morgan Jones, Molly Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment |
title | Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment |
title_full | Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment |
title_fullStr | Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment |
title_short | Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment |
title_sort | comparative performance of adult social care research, 1996–2011: a bibliometric assessment |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbelldavid comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment AT cotegregoire comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment AT grantjonathan comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment AT knappmartin comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment AT mehtaanji comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment AT morganjonesmolly comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment |