Cargando…

Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment

Decision makers in adult social care are increasingly interested in using evidence from research to support or shape their decisions. The scope and nature of the current landscape of adult social care research (ASCR) need to be better understood. This paper provides a bibliometric assessment of ASCR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, David, Côté, Grégoire, Grant, Jonathan, Knapp, Martin, Mehta, Anji, Morgan Jones, Molly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv022
_version_ 1782448107403870208
author Campbell, David
Côté, Grégoire
Grant, Jonathan
Knapp, Martin
Mehta, Anji
Morgan Jones, Molly
author_facet Campbell, David
Côté, Grégoire
Grant, Jonathan
Knapp, Martin
Mehta, Anji
Morgan Jones, Molly
author_sort Campbell, David
collection PubMed
description Decision makers in adult social care are increasingly interested in using evidence from research to support or shape their decisions. The scope and nature of the current landscape of adult social care research (ASCR) need to be better understood. This paper provides a bibliometric assessment of ASCR outputs from 1996 to 2011. ASCR papers were retrieved using three strategies: from key journals; using keywords and noun phrases; and from additional papers preferentially citing or being cited by other ASCR papers. Overall, 195,829 ASCR papers were identified in the bibliographic database Scopus, of which 16 per cent involved at least one author from the UK. The UK output increased 2.45-fold between 1996 and 2011. Among selected countries, those with greater research intensity in ASCR generally had higher citation impact, such as the USA, UK, Canada and the Netherlands. The top five UK institutions in terms of volume of papers in the UK accounted for 26 per cent of total output. We conclude by noting the limitations to bibliometric analysis of ASCR and examine how such analysis can support the strategic development of the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4985733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49857332016-08-22 Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment Campbell, David Côté, Grégoire Grant, Jonathan Knapp, Martin Mehta, Anji Morgan Jones, Molly Br J Soc Work Articles Decision makers in adult social care are increasingly interested in using evidence from research to support or shape their decisions. The scope and nature of the current landscape of adult social care research (ASCR) need to be better understood. This paper provides a bibliometric assessment of ASCR outputs from 1996 to 2011. ASCR papers were retrieved using three strategies: from key journals; using keywords and noun phrases; and from additional papers preferentially citing or being cited by other ASCR papers. Overall, 195,829 ASCR papers were identified in the bibliographic database Scopus, of which 16 per cent involved at least one author from the UK. The UK output increased 2.45-fold between 1996 and 2011. Among selected countries, those with greater research intensity in ASCR generally had higher citation impact, such as the USA, UK, Canada and the Netherlands. The top five UK institutions in terms of volume of papers in the UK accounted for 26 per cent of total output. We conclude by noting the limitations to bibliometric analysis of ASCR and examine how such analysis can support the strategic development of the field. Oxford University Press 2016-07 2015-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4985733/ /pubmed/27559228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv022 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Articles
Campbell, David
Côté, Grégoire
Grant, Jonathan
Knapp, Martin
Mehta, Anji
Morgan Jones, Molly
Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment
title Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment
title_full Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment
title_fullStr Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment
title_short Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996–2011: A Bibliometric Assessment
title_sort comparative performance of adult social care research, 1996–2011: a bibliometric assessment
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv022
work_keys_str_mv AT campbelldavid comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment
AT cotegregoire comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment
AT grantjonathan comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment
AT knappmartin comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment
AT mehtaanji comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment
AT morganjonesmolly comparativeperformanceofadultsocialcareresearch19962011abibliometricassessment