Cargando…

Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Social isolation is common in patients with psychosis and associated with a number of negative outcomes. Programmes in which volunteers provide one-to-one support—often referred to as befriending—have been reputed to achieve favourable outcomes. However, trial-based evidence for their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Priebe, Stefan, Pavlickova, Hana, Eldridge, Sandra, Golden, Eoin, McCrone, Paul, Ockenden, Nick, Pistrang, Nancy, King, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011582
_version_ 1782448129285554176
author Priebe, Stefan
Pavlickova, Hana
Eldridge, Sandra
Golden, Eoin
McCrone, Paul
Ockenden, Nick
Pistrang, Nancy
King, Michael
author_facet Priebe, Stefan
Pavlickova, Hana
Eldridge, Sandra
Golden, Eoin
McCrone, Paul
Ockenden, Nick
Pistrang, Nancy
King, Michael
author_sort Priebe, Stefan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Social isolation is common in patients with psychosis and associated with a number of negative outcomes. Programmes in which volunteers provide one-to-one support—often referred to as befriending—have been reputed to achieve favourable outcomes. However, trial-based evidence for their effectiveness is limited. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of one-to-one volunteer support with an active control condition for patients with psychosis over a 1-year period. Patients in the intervention group will receive the support of a volunteer for 1 year, who will meet them weekly and engage them in social and recreational activities. Patients in the control group will not receive support from a volunteer. In both groups, patients will be given a booklet detailing locally available social activities and otherwise receive treatment as usual. Patients, volunteers, clinicians and researchers involved in the delivery of the intervention will not be blinded to group assignment, while researchers carrying out data collection will be blinded. Data collection will be conducted at baseline, at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the amount of time spent engaging in social activities per day. Secondary outcomes include symptoms, quality of life, self-esteem and costs of care. Attitudes of volunteers towards mentally ill people will be assessed. Finally, in-depth interviews will be conducted with patients and volunteers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee London—Camden & Kings Cross (reference 15/LO/0674). The findings of the trial will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals and in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) journals library, and presented at scientific conferences. In addition, findings will be summarised for a lay audience and circulated to all relevant National Health Service (NHS) and voluntary organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14021839; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4985859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49858592016-08-19 Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial Priebe, Stefan Pavlickova, Hana Eldridge, Sandra Golden, Eoin McCrone, Paul Ockenden, Nick Pistrang, Nancy King, Michael BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Social isolation is common in patients with psychosis and associated with a number of negative outcomes. Programmes in which volunteers provide one-to-one support—often referred to as befriending—have been reputed to achieve favourable outcomes. However, trial-based evidence for their effectiveness is limited. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of one-to-one volunteer support with an active control condition for patients with psychosis over a 1-year period. Patients in the intervention group will receive the support of a volunteer for 1 year, who will meet them weekly and engage them in social and recreational activities. Patients in the control group will not receive support from a volunteer. In both groups, patients will be given a booklet detailing locally available social activities and otherwise receive treatment as usual. Patients, volunteers, clinicians and researchers involved in the delivery of the intervention will not be blinded to group assignment, while researchers carrying out data collection will be blinded. Data collection will be conducted at baseline, at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the amount of time spent engaging in social activities per day. Secondary outcomes include symptoms, quality of life, self-esteem and costs of care. Attitudes of volunteers towards mentally ill people will be assessed. Finally, in-depth interviews will be conducted with patients and volunteers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee London—Camden & Kings Cross (reference 15/LO/0674). The findings of the trial will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals and in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) journals library, and presented at scientific conferences. In addition, findings will be summarised for a lay audience and circulated to all relevant National Health Service (NHS) and voluntary organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14021839; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4985859/ /pubmed/27489153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011582 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Priebe, Stefan
Pavlickova, Hana
Eldridge, Sandra
Golden, Eoin
McCrone, Paul
Ockenden, Nick
Pistrang, Nancy
King, Michael
Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011582
work_keys_str_mv AT priebestefan effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pavlickovahana effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eldridgesandra effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goldeneoin effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccronepaul effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ockendennick effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pistrangnancy effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kingmichael effectivenessofonetoonevolunteersupportforpatientswithpsychosisprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial