Cargando…

Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people

OBJECTIVES: Quality improvement projects to address transitions of care across care boundaries are increasingly common but meet with mixed success for reasons that are poorly understood. We aimed to characterise challenges in a project to improve transitions for older people between hospital and car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutton, Elizabeth, Dixon-Woods, Mary, Tarrant, Carolyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010988
_version_ 1782448137801039872
author Sutton, Elizabeth
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Tarrant, Carolyn
author_facet Sutton, Elizabeth
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Tarrant, Carolyn
author_sort Sutton, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Quality improvement projects to address transitions of care across care boundaries are increasingly common but meet with mixed success for reasons that are poorly understood. We aimed to characterise challenges in a project to improve transitions for older people between hospital and care homes. DESIGN: Independent process evaluation, using ethnographic observations and interviews, of a quality improvement project. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An English hospital and two residential care homes for older people. DATA: 32 hours of non-participant observations and 12 semistructured interviews with project members, hospital and care home staff. RESULTS: A hospital-based improvement team sought to reduce unplanned readmissions from residential care homes using interventions including a community-based geriatric team that could be accessed directly by care homes and a communication tool intended to facilitate transfer of information between homes and hospital. Only very modest (if any) impacts of these interventions on readmission rates could be detected. The process evaluation identified multiple challenges in implementing interventions and securing improvement. Many of these arose because of lack of consensus on the nature of the problem and the proper solutions: while the hospital team was keen to reduce readmissions and saw the problems as lying in poor communication and lack of community-based support for care homes, the care home staff had different priorities. Care home staff were unconvinced that the improvement interventions were aligned with their needs or addressed their concerns, resulting in compromised implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Process evaluations have a valuable role in quality improvement. Our study suggests that a key task for quality improvement projects aimed at transitions of care is that of developing a shared view of the problem to be addressed. A more participatory approach could help to surface assumptions, interpretations and interests and could facilitate the coproduction of solutions. This finding is likely to have broader applicability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4985971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49859712016-08-19 Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people Sutton, Elizabeth Dixon-Woods, Mary Tarrant, Carolyn BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Quality improvement projects to address transitions of care across care boundaries are increasingly common but meet with mixed success for reasons that are poorly understood. We aimed to characterise challenges in a project to improve transitions for older people between hospital and care homes. DESIGN: Independent process evaluation, using ethnographic observations and interviews, of a quality improvement project. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An English hospital and two residential care homes for older people. DATA: 32 hours of non-participant observations and 12 semistructured interviews with project members, hospital and care home staff. RESULTS: A hospital-based improvement team sought to reduce unplanned readmissions from residential care homes using interventions including a community-based geriatric team that could be accessed directly by care homes and a communication tool intended to facilitate transfer of information between homes and hospital. Only very modest (if any) impacts of these interventions on readmission rates could be detected. The process evaluation identified multiple challenges in implementing interventions and securing improvement. Many of these arose because of lack of consensus on the nature of the problem and the proper solutions: while the hospital team was keen to reduce readmissions and saw the problems as lying in poor communication and lack of community-based support for care homes, the care home staff had different priorities. Care home staff were unconvinced that the improvement interventions were aligned with their needs or addressed their concerns, resulting in compromised implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Process evaluations have a valuable role in quality improvement. Our study suggests that a key task for quality improvement projects aimed at transitions of care is that of developing a shared view of the problem to be addressed. A more participatory approach could help to surface assumptions, interpretations and interests and could facilitate the coproduction of solutions. This finding is likely to have broader applicability. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4985971/ /pubmed/27491666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010988 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Sutton, Elizabeth
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Tarrant, Carolyn
Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people
title Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people
title_full Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people
title_fullStr Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people
title_full_unstemmed Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people
title_short Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people
title_sort ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010988
work_keys_str_mv AT suttonelizabeth ethnographicprocessevaluationofaqualityimprovementprojecttoimprovetransitionsofcareforolderpeople
AT dixonwoodsmary ethnographicprocessevaluationofaqualityimprovementprojecttoimprovetransitionsofcareforolderpeople
AT tarrantcarolyn ethnographicprocessevaluationofaqualityimprovementprojecttoimprovetransitionsofcareforolderpeople