Cargando…
Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in patients with urolithiasis. For ureter-localized stones, SWL is often preceded by a double J stent insertion. However, fear of serious complications, including sepsis associated with stents...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4986290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551556 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.680 |
_version_ | 1782448178432311296 |
---|---|
author | Kaczmarek, Krystian Gołąb, Adam Słojewski, Marcin |
author_facet | Kaczmarek, Krystian Gołąb, Adam Słojewski, Marcin |
author_sort | Kaczmarek, Krystian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in patients with urolithiasis. For ureter-localized stones, SWL is often preceded by a double J stent insertion. However, fear of serious complications, including sepsis associated with stents, is often expressed. The following study assessed the impact of stent insertions on the results of SWL in patients with ureteric stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 411 ureteric stone patients who were treated with SWL from January 2010 to December 2014. In 60 cases, treatment was preceded by ureteric stent insertion. A propensity scoring system was used to pair non-stented patients with the stented group. Success rates were assessed and compared using the chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of particular variables on the stone-free rate. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 82.2%. After matching, the success rate of the stented group was not significantly different from the control group (85.0% vs. 83.3% respectively, p = 0.80). The mean number of sessions was higher in the stented group (1.88 per patient). Stones located in the lower part of the ureter have the greatest chance of being successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: The double J stent has no influence on the outcome of SWL treatment. In view of the greater likelihood of having additional sessions, this approach should be reserved for selected cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4986290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49862902016-08-22 Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis Kaczmarek, Krystian Gołąb, Adam Słojewski, Marcin Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in patients with urolithiasis. For ureter-localized stones, SWL is often preceded by a double J stent insertion. However, fear of serious complications, including sepsis associated with stents, is often expressed. The following study assessed the impact of stent insertions on the results of SWL in patients with ureteric stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 411 ureteric stone patients who were treated with SWL from January 2010 to December 2014. In 60 cases, treatment was preceded by ureteric stent insertion. A propensity scoring system was used to pair non-stented patients with the stented group. Success rates were assessed and compared using the chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of particular variables on the stone-free rate. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 82.2%. After matching, the success rate of the stented group was not significantly different from the control group (85.0% vs. 83.3% respectively, p = 0.80). The mean number of sessions was higher in the stented group (1.88 per patient). Stones located in the lower part of the ureter have the greatest chance of being successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: The double J stent has no influence on the outcome of SWL treatment. In view of the greater likelihood of having additional sessions, this approach should be reserved for selected cases. Polish Urological Association 2016-04-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4986290/ /pubmed/27551556 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.680 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kaczmarek, Krystian Gołąb, Adam Słojewski, Marcin Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis |
title | Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis |
title_full | Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis |
title_short | Impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A propensity score analysis |
title_sort | impact of ureteric stent on outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: a propensity score analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4986290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551556 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaczmarekkrystian impactofuretericstentonoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyapropensityscoreanalysis AT gołabadam impactofuretericstentonoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyapropensityscoreanalysis AT słojewskimarcin impactofuretericstentonoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyapropensityscoreanalysis |