Cargando…

Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation

Spruce wood specimens were bonded with one-component polyurethane (PUR) and urea-formaldehyde (UF) adhesive, respectively. The adhesion of the adhesives to the wood cell wall was evaluated at two different locations by means of a new micromechanical assay based on nanoindentation. One location teste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obersriebnig, Michael, Konnerth, Johannes, Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4986323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.011
_version_ 1782448185691602944
author Obersriebnig, Michael
Konnerth, Johannes
Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang
author_facet Obersriebnig, Michael
Konnerth, Johannes
Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang
author_sort Obersriebnig, Michael
collection PubMed
description Spruce wood specimens were bonded with one-component polyurethane (PUR) and urea-formaldehyde (UF) adhesive, respectively. The adhesion of the adhesives to the wood cell wall was evaluated at two different locations by means of a new micromechanical assay based on nanoindentation. One location tested corresponded to the interface between the adhesive and the natural inner cell wall surface of the secondary cell wall layer 3 (S3), whereas the second location corresponded to the interface between the adhesive and the freshly cut secondary cell wall layer 2 (S2). Overall, a trend towards reduced cell wall adhesion was found for PUR compared to UF. Position-resolved examination revealed excellent adhesion of UF to freshly cut cell walls (S2) but significantly diminished adhesion to the inner cell wall surface (S3). In contrast, PUR showed better adhesion to the inner cell wall surface and less adhesion to freshly cut cell walls. Atomic force microscopy revealed a less polar character for the inner cell wall surface (S3) compared to freshly cut cell walls (S2). It is proposed that differences in the polarity of the used adhesives and the surface chemistry of the two cell wall surfaces examined account for the observed trends.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4986323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49863232016-08-25 Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation Obersriebnig, Michael Konnerth, Johannes Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang Int J Adhes Adhes Article Spruce wood specimens were bonded with one-component polyurethane (PUR) and urea-formaldehyde (UF) adhesive, respectively. The adhesion of the adhesives to the wood cell wall was evaluated at two different locations by means of a new micromechanical assay based on nanoindentation. One location tested corresponded to the interface between the adhesive and the natural inner cell wall surface of the secondary cell wall layer 3 (S3), whereas the second location corresponded to the interface between the adhesive and the freshly cut secondary cell wall layer 2 (S2). Overall, a trend towards reduced cell wall adhesion was found for PUR compared to UF. Position-resolved examination revealed excellent adhesion of UF to freshly cut cell walls (S2) but significantly diminished adhesion to the inner cell wall surface (S3). In contrast, PUR showed better adhesion to the inner cell wall surface and less adhesion to freshly cut cell walls. Atomic force microscopy revealed a less polar character for the inner cell wall surface (S3) compared to freshly cut cell walls (S2). It is proposed that differences in the polarity of the used adhesives and the surface chemistry of the two cell wall surfaces examined account for the observed trends. Elsevier Science 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4986323/ /pubmed/27570321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.011 Text en © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY NC ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Obersriebnig, Michael
Konnerth, Johannes
Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang
Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
title Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
title_full Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
title_fullStr Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
title_short Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
title_sort evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4986323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.011
work_keys_str_mv AT obersriebnigmichael evaluatingfundamentalpositiondependentdifferencesinwoodcellwalladhesionusingnanoindentation
AT konnerthjohannes evaluatingfundamentalpositiondependentdifferencesinwoodcellwalladhesionusingnanoindentation
AT gindlaltmutterwolfgang evaluatingfundamentalpositiondependentdifferencesinwoodcellwalladhesionusingnanoindentation