Cargando…

Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab (IPI), an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, and vemurafenib (VEM), a BRAF inhibitor, have distinct mechanisms of action and shared toxicities (e.g., skin, gastrointestinal [GI] and hepatobiliary disorders) that may preclude concomitant administration. Concurrent administration of IPI and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amin, Asim, Lawson, David H., Salama, April K.S., Koon, Henry B., Guthrie, Troy, Thomas, Sajeve S., O’Day, Steven J., Shaheen, Montaser F., Zhang, Bin, Francis, Stephen, Hodi, F. Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4986368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27532019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0148-7
_version_ 1782448193360887808
author Amin, Asim
Lawson, David H.
Salama, April K.S.
Koon, Henry B.
Guthrie, Troy
Thomas, Sajeve S.
O’Day, Steven J.
Shaheen, Montaser F.
Zhang, Bin
Francis, Stephen
Hodi, F. Stephen
author_facet Amin, Asim
Lawson, David H.
Salama, April K.S.
Koon, Henry B.
Guthrie, Troy
Thomas, Sajeve S.
O’Day, Steven J.
Shaheen, Montaser F.
Zhang, Bin
Francis, Stephen
Hodi, F. Stephen
author_sort Amin, Asim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab (IPI), an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, and vemurafenib (VEM), a BRAF inhibitor, have distinct mechanisms of action and shared toxicities (e.g., skin, gastrointestinal [GI] and hepatobiliary disorders) that may preclude concomitant administration. Concurrent administration of IPI and VEM previously showed significant dose-limiting hepatotoxicity in advanced melanoma. This single-arm, open-label, phase II study evaluated a sequencing strategy with these two agents in previously untreated patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. METHODS: This study was divided into two parts. During Part 1 (VEM1-IPI), patients received VEM 960 mg twice daily for 6 weeks followed by IPI 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses (induction), then every 12 weeks (maintenance) beginning at week 24 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During Part 2 (VEM2), patients who progressed after IPI received VEM at their previously tolerated dose. The primary objective was to estimate the incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related skin adverse events (AEs) during VEM1-IPI. RESULTS: All patients who were initially treated with VEM (n = 46) received IPI induction therapy; 8 received IPI maintenance and 19 were treated during VEM2. During VEM1-IPI, the incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related AEs associated with the skin, GI tract, and hepatobiliary system was 32.6 %, 21.7 %, and 4.3 %, respectively. There were no drug-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 15.3 months, median overall survival was 18.5 months. Median progression-free survival was 4.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: VEM (960 mg twice daily for 6 weeks) followed by IPI 10 mg/kg has a manageable safety profile. The benefits/risks of BRAF inhibitors followed by immunotherapy should be evaluated further in light of continuing developments in treatment options for metastatic melanoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01673854 (CA184-240) Registered 24 August 2012
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4986368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49863682016-08-17 Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma Amin, Asim Lawson, David H. Salama, April K.S. Koon, Henry B. Guthrie, Troy Thomas, Sajeve S. O’Day, Steven J. Shaheen, Montaser F. Zhang, Bin Francis, Stephen Hodi, F. Stephen J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab (IPI), an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, and vemurafenib (VEM), a BRAF inhibitor, have distinct mechanisms of action and shared toxicities (e.g., skin, gastrointestinal [GI] and hepatobiliary disorders) that may preclude concomitant administration. Concurrent administration of IPI and VEM previously showed significant dose-limiting hepatotoxicity in advanced melanoma. This single-arm, open-label, phase II study evaluated a sequencing strategy with these two agents in previously untreated patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. METHODS: This study was divided into two parts. During Part 1 (VEM1-IPI), patients received VEM 960 mg twice daily for 6 weeks followed by IPI 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses (induction), then every 12 weeks (maintenance) beginning at week 24 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During Part 2 (VEM2), patients who progressed after IPI received VEM at their previously tolerated dose. The primary objective was to estimate the incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related skin adverse events (AEs) during VEM1-IPI. RESULTS: All patients who were initially treated with VEM (n = 46) received IPI induction therapy; 8 received IPI maintenance and 19 were treated during VEM2. During VEM1-IPI, the incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related AEs associated with the skin, GI tract, and hepatobiliary system was 32.6 %, 21.7 %, and 4.3 %, respectively. There were no drug-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 15.3 months, median overall survival was 18.5 months. Median progression-free survival was 4.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: VEM (960 mg twice daily for 6 weeks) followed by IPI 10 mg/kg has a manageable safety profile. The benefits/risks of BRAF inhibitors followed by immunotherapy should be evaluated further in light of continuing developments in treatment options for metastatic melanoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01673854 (CA184-240) Registered 24 August 2012 BioMed Central 2016-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4986368/ /pubmed/27532019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0148-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amin, Asim
Lawson, David H.
Salama, April K.S.
Koon, Henry B.
Guthrie, Troy
Thomas, Sajeve S.
O’Day, Steven J.
Shaheen, Montaser F.
Zhang, Bin
Francis, Stephen
Hodi, F. Stephen
Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma
title Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma
title_full Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma
title_fullStr Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma
title_short Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma
title_sort phase ii study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated braf-mutated metastatic melanoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4986368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27532019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0148-7
work_keys_str_mv AT aminasim phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT lawsondavidh phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT salamaaprilks phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT koonhenryb phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT guthrietroy phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT thomassajeves phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT odaystevenj phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT shaheenmontaserf phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT zhangbin phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT francisstephen phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma
AT hodifstephen phaseiistudyofvemurafenibfollowedbyipilimumabinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedbrafmutatedmetastaticmelanoma