Cargando…

Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method

BACKGROUND: Tumor proliferation speed, most commonly assessed by counting of mitotic figures in histological slide preparations, is an important biomarker for breast cancer. Although mitosis counting is routinely performed by pathologists, it is a tedious and subjective task with poor reproducibilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veta, Mitko, van Diest, Paul J., Jiwa, Mehdi, Al-Janabi, Shaimaa, Pluim, Josien P. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161286
_version_ 1782448260714070016
author Veta, Mitko
van Diest, Paul J.
Jiwa, Mehdi
Al-Janabi, Shaimaa
Pluim, Josien P. W.
author_facet Veta, Mitko
van Diest, Paul J.
Jiwa, Mehdi
Al-Janabi, Shaimaa
Pluim, Josien P. W.
author_sort Veta, Mitko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tumor proliferation speed, most commonly assessed by counting of mitotic figures in histological slide preparations, is an important biomarker for breast cancer. Although mitosis counting is routinely performed by pathologists, it is a tedious and subjective task with poor reproducibility, particularly among non-experts. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of mitosis counting can be improved when a strict protocol is defined and followed. Previous studies have examined only the agreement in terms of the mitotic count or the mitotic activity score. Studies of the observer agreement at the level of individual objects, which can provide more insight into the procedure, have not been performed thus far. METHODS: The development of automatic mitosis detection methods has received large interest in recent years. Automatic image analysis is viewed as a solution for the problem of subjectivity of mitosis counting by pathologists. In this paper we describe the results from an interobserver agreement study between three human observers and an automatic method, and make two unique contributions. For the first time, we present an analysis of the object-level interobserver agreement on mitosis counting. Furthermore, we train an automatic mitosis detection method that is robust with respect to staining appearance variability and compare it with the performance of expert observers on an “external” dataset, i.e. on histopathology images that originate from pathology labs other than the pathology lab that provided the training data for the automatic method. RESULTS: The object-level interobserver study revealed that pathologists often do not agree on individual objects, even if this is not reflected in the mitotic count. The disagreement is larger for objects from smaller size, which suggests that adding a size constraint in the mitosis counting protocol can improve reproducibility. The automatic mitosis detection method can perform mitosis counting in an unbiased way, with substantial agreement with human experts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4987048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49870482016-08-29 Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method Veta, Mitko van Diest, Paul J. Jiwa, Mehdi Al-Janabi, Shaimaa Pluim, Josien P. W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Tumor proliferation speed, most commonly assessed by counting of mitotic figures in histological slide preparations, is an important biomarker for breast cancer. Although mitosis counting is routinely performed by pathologists, it is a tedious and subjective task with poor reproducibility, particularly among non-experts. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of mitosis counting can be improved when a strict protocol is defined and followed. Previous studies have examined only the agreement in terms of the mitotic count or the mitotic activity score. Studies of the observer agreement at the level of individual objects, which can provide more insight into the procedure, have not been performed thus far. METHODS: The development of automatic mitosis detection methods has received large interest in recent years. Automatic image analysis is viewed as a solution for the problem of subjectivity of mitosis counting by pathologists. In this paper we describe the results from an interobserver agreement study between three human observers and an automatic method, and make two unique contributions. For the first time, we present an analysis of the object-level interobserver agreement on mitosis counting. Furthermore, we train an automatic mitosis detection method that is robust with respect to staining appearance variability and compare it with the performance of expert observers on an “external” dataset, i.e. on histopathology images that originate from pathology labs other than the pathology lab that provided the training data for the automatic method. RESULTS: The object-level interobserver study revealed that pathologists often do not agree on individual objects, even if this is not reflected in the mitotic count. The disagreement is larger for objects from smaller size, which suggests that adding a size constraint in the mitosis counting protocol can improve reproducibility. The automatic mitosis detection method can perform mitosis counting in an unbiased way, with substantial agreement with human experts. Public Library of Science 2016-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4987048/ /pubmed/27529701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161286 Text en © 2016 Veta et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Veta, Mitko
van Diest, Paul J.
Jiwa, Mehdi
Al-Janabi, Shaimaa
Pluim, Josien P. W.
Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method
title Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method
title_full Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method
title_fullStr Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method
title_full_unstemmed Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method
title_short Mitosis Counting in Breast Cancer: Object-Level Interobserver Agreement and Comparison to an Automatic Method
title_sort mitosis counting in breast cancer: object-level interobserver agreement and comparison to an automatic method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161286
work_keys_str_mv AT vetamitko mitosiscountinginbreastcancerobjectlevelinterobserveragreementandcomparisontoanautomaticmethod
AT vandiestpaulj mitosiscountinginbreastcancerobjectlevelinterobserveragreementandcomparisontoanautomaticmethod
AT jiwamehdi mitosiscountinginbreastcancerobjectlevelinterobserveragreementandcomparisontoanautomaticmethod
AT aljanabishaimaa mitosiscountinginbreastcancerobjectlevelinterobserveragreementandcomparisontoanautomaticmethod
AT pluimjosienpw mitosiscountinginbreastcancerobjectlevelinterobserveragreementandcomparisontoanautomaticmethod