Cargando…

Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity of stimulated echo acquisition mode diffusion weighted imaging (STEAM-DWI) to ischemic stroke in comparison to echo-planar imaging diffusion weighted imaging (EPI-DWI) in the infratentorial compartment. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients presenting with clinical feat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalil, Ahmed A., Hohenhaus, Marc, Kunze, Claudia, Schmidt, Wolf, Brunecker, Peter, Villringer, Kersten, Merboldt, Klaus-Dietmar, Frahm, Jens, Fiebach, Jochen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161416
_version_ 1782448263450853376
author Khalil, Ahmed A.
Hohenhaus, Marc
Kunze, Claudia
Schmidt, Wolf
Brunecker, Peter
Villringer, Kersten
Merboldt, Klaus-Dietmar
Frahm, Jens
Fiebach, Jochen B.
author_facet Khalil, Ahmed A.
Hohenhaus, Marc
Kunze, Claudia
Schmidt, Wolf
Brunecker, Peter
Villringer, Kersten
Merboldt, Klaus-Dietmar
Frahm, Jens
Fiebach, Jochen B.
author_sort Khalil, Ahmed A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity of stimulated echo acquisition mode diffusion weighted imaging (STEAM-DWI) to ischemic stroke in comparison to echo-planar imaging diffusion weighted imaging (EPI-DWI) in the infratentorial compartment. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients presenting with clinical features of infratentorial stroke underwent STEAM-DWI, high-resolution EPI-DWI (HR-DWI, 2.5 mm slice thickness) and low-resolution EPI-DWI (LR-DWI, 5 mm slice thickness). Four readers assessed the presence of ischemic lesions and artifacts. Agreement between sequences and interobserver agreement on the presence of ischemia were calculated. The sensitivities of the DWI sequences were calculated in 45 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of infratentorial stroke. RESULTS: Median time from symptom onset to imaging was 24 hours. STEAM-DWI agreed with LR-DWI in 89.5% of cases (kappa = 0.72, p<0.0001) and with HR-DWI in 89.5% of cases (kappa = 0.68, p<0.0001). STEAM-DWI showed fewer intraparenchymal artifacts (1/57) than HR-DWI (44/57) and LR-DWI (41/57). Ischemia was visible in 87% of cases for LR-DWI, 93% of cases for HR-DWI, and 89% of cases for STEAM-DWI. Interobserver agreement was good for STEAM-DWI (kappa = 0.62, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the best currently available MR sequence for detecting ischemia (HR-DWI), STEAM-DWI shows fewer artifacts and a similar sensitivity to infratentorial stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4987060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49870602016-08-29 Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke Khalil, Ahmed A. Hohenhaus, Marc Kunze, Claudia Schmidt, Wolf Brunecker, Peter Villringer, Kersten Merboldt, Klaus-Dietmar Frahm, Jens Fiebach, Jochen B. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity of stimulated echo acquisition mode diffusion weighted imaging (STEAM-DWI) to ischemic stroke in comparison to echo-planar imaging diffusion weighted imaging (EPI-DWI) in the infratentorial compartment. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients presenting with clinical features of infratentorial stroke underwent STEAM-DWI, high-resolution EPI-DWI (HR-DWI, 2.5 mm slice thickness) and low-resolution EPI-DWI (LR-DWI, 5 mm slice thickness). Four readers assessed the presence of ischemic lesions and artifacts. Agreement between sequences and interobserver agreement on the presence of ischemia were calculated. The sensitivities of the DWI sequences were calculated in 45 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of infratentorial stroke. RESULTS: Median time from symptom onset to imaging was 24 hours. STEAM-DWI agreed with LR-DWI in 89.5% of cases (kappa = 0.72, p<0.0001) and with HR-DWI in 89.5% of cases (kappa = 0.68, p<0.0001). STEAM-DWI showed fewer intraparenchymal artifacts (1/57) than HR-DWI (44/57) and LR-DWI (41/57). Ischemia was visible in 87% of cases for LR-DWI, 93% of cases for HR-DWI, and 89% of cases for STEAM-DWI. Interobserver agreement was good for STEAM-DWI (kappa = 0.62, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the best currently available MR sequence for detecting ischemia (HR-DWI), STEAM-DWI shows fewer artifacts and a similar sensitivity to infratentorial stroke. Public Library of Science 2016-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4987060/ /pubmed/27529697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161416 Text en © 2016 Khalil et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khalil, Ahmed A.
Hohenhaus, Marc
Kunze, Claudia
Schmidt, Wolf
Brunecker, Peter
Villringer, Kersten
Merboldt, Klaus-Dietmar
Frahm, Jens
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke
title Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke
title_full Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke
title_fullStr Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke
title_short Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted STEAM MRI and EPI-DWI to Infratentorial Ischemic Stroke
title_sort sensitivity of diffusion-weighted steam mri and epi-dwi to infratentorial ischemic stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161416
work_keys_str_mv AT khalilahmeda sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT hohenhausmarc sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT kunzeclaudia sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT schmidtwolf sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT bruneckerpeter sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT villringerkersten sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT merboldtklausdietmar sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT frahmjens sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke
AT fiebachjochenb sensitivityofdiffusionweightedsteammriandepidwitoinfratentorialischemicstroke