Cargando…

Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery)

BACKGROUND: Recovery in mental health care is complex, highly individual and can be facilitated by a range of professional and non-professional support. In this study we will examine how recovery from mental health problems is promoted in non-medical settings. We hypothesise a relationship between i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coffey, Michael, Hannigan, Ben, Meudell, Alan, Hunt, Julian, Fitzsimmons, Deb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27530510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1640-y
_version_ 1782448397783924736
author Coffey, Michael
Hannigan, Ben
Meudell, Alan
Hunt, Julian
Fitzsimmons, Deb
author_facet Coffey, Michael
Hannigan, Ben
Meudell, Alan
Hunt, Julian
Fitzsimmons, Deb
author_sort Coffey, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recovery in mental health care is complex, highly individual and can be facilitated by a range of professional and non-professional support. In this study we will examine how recovery from mental health problems is promoted in non-medical settings. We hypothesise a relationship between involvement in decisions about care, social support and recovery and quality of life outcomes. METHODS: We will use standardised validated instruments of involvement in decision-making, social contacts, recovery and quality of life with a random sample of people accessing non-statutory mental health social care services in Wales. We will add to this important information with detailed one to one case study interviews with people, their family members and their support workers. We will use a series of these interviews to examine how people build recovery over time to help us understand more about their involvement in decisions and the social links they build. DISCUSSION: We want to see how being involved in decisions about care and the social links people have are related to recovery and quality of life for people with experience of using mental health support services. We want to understand the different perspectives of the people involved in making recovery possible. We will use this information to guide further studies of particular types of social interventions and their use in helping recovery from mental health problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4988045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49880452016-08-18 Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery) Coffey, Michael Hannigan, Ben Meudell, Alan Hunt, Julian Fitzsimmons, Deb BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Recovery in mental health care is complex, highly individual and can be facilitated by a range of professional and non-professional support. In this study we will examine how recovery from mental health problems is promoted in non-medical settings. We hypothesise a relationship between involvement in decisions about care, social support and recovery and quality of life outcomes. METHODS: We will use standardised validated instruments of involvement in decision-making, social contacts, recovery and quality of life with a random sample of people accessing non-statutory mental health social care services in Wales. We will add to this important information with detailed one to one case study interviews with people, their family members and their support workers. We will use a series of these interviews to examine how people build recovery over time to help us understand more about their involvement in decisions and the social links they build. DISCUSSION: We want to see how being involved in decisions about care and the social links people have are related to recovery and quality of life for people with experience of using mental health support services. We want to understand the different perspectives of the people involved in making recovery possible. We will use this information to guide further studies of particular types of social interventions and their use in helping recovery from mental health problems. BioMed Central 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4988045/ /pubmed/27530510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1640-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Coffey, Michael
Hannigan, Ben
Meudell, Alan
Hunt, Julian
Fitzsimmons, Deb
Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery)
title Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery)
title_full Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery)
title_fullStr Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery)
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery)
title_short Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery)
title_sort study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (plan4recovery)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27530510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1640-y
work_keys_str_mv AT coffeymichael studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudytoassessmentalhealthrecoveryshareddecisionmakingandqualityoflifeplan4recovery
AT hanniganben studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudytoassessmentalhealthrecoveryshareddecisionmakingandqualityoflifeplan4recovery
AT meudellalan studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudytoassessmentalhealthrecoveryshareddecisionmakingandqualityoflifeplan4recovery
AT huntjulian studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudytoassessmentalhealthrecoveryshareddecisionmakingandqualityoflifeplan4recovery
AT fitzsimmonsdeb studyprotocolamixedmethodsstudytoassessmentalhealthrecoveryshareddecisionmakingandqualityoflifeplan4recovery