Cargando…

Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis

The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of two different standardized endodontic irrigation protocols. It was assumed that the additional use of ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) would result in an increased rate of absence of sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hertel, Moritz, Sommer, Katja, Kostka, Eckehard, Imiolczyk, Sandra Maria, Ballout, Husam, Preissner, Saskia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583047
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210616021001375
_version_ 1782448401663655936
author Hertel, Moritz
Sommer, Katja
Kostka, Eckehard
Imiolczyk, Sandra Maria
Ballout, Husam
Preissner, Saskia
author_facet Hertel, Moritz
Sommer, Katja
Kostka, Eckehard
Imiolczyk, Sandra Maria
Ballout, Husam
Preissner, Saskia
author_sort Hertel, Moritz
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of two different standardized endodontic irrigation protocols. It was assumed that the additional use of ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) would result in an increased rate of absence of symptoms and remission based on the periapical index (PAI) compared to passive irrigation using only sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Data and radiographs from 199 teeth retrieved from the institutional endodontic database were analyzed retrospectively. In 106 teeth irrigation was performed using only NaOCl (protocol 1). Ninety-three teeth were irrigated using NaOCl and EDTA (protocol 2). Chlorhexidine (CHX) was additionally used in revision treatments in both groups. All irrigants in group 2 were activated by PUI. Mean follow-up periods were: protocol 1 = 9.2 ± 4.4 and protocol 2 = 6.6 ± 2.5 months (p < 0.0001 (chi-square test). The frequencies of the PAI(masterpoint) and PAI(follow-up) scores did not differ significantly between teeth, which received either protocol 1 or 2 (p = 0.555 and 0.138). Statistical analysis revealed no significant association between treatment success (absence of clinical symptoms and PAI(follow-up) = I or PAI(masterpoint) > PAI(follow-up) > I) and the applied protocol (success rates: protocol 1 = 72.6% vs. protocol 2 = 82.8%; p = 0.203). Furthermore, the frequency of extractions did not differ significantly between the two protocols (p = 0.102). No association was found between follow-up time and treatment success (p = 0.888). The hypothesis was not confirmed. Even though the obtained success rate was higher after supplementing the irrigation protocol with EDTA and PUI, no significance was recorded. Hence, protocol 2 was not superior to protocol 1 regarding therapy success, at least within the limited follow-up period. It may be cautiously concluded that sufficient mechanical debridement combined with passive NaOCl irrigation results in comparably high success rates compared to EDTA and PUI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4988088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49880882016-08-31 Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis Hertel, Moritz Sommer, Katja Kostka, Eckehard Imiolczyk, Sandra Maria Ballout, Husam Preissner, Saskia Open Dent J Article The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of two different standardized endodontic irrigation protocols. It was assumed that the additional use of ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) would result in an increased rate of absence of symptoms and remission based on the periapical index (PAI) compared to passive irrigation using only sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Data and radiographs from 199 teeth retrieved from the institutional endodontic database were analyzed retrospectively. In 106 teeth irrigation was performed using only NaOCl (protocol 1). Ninety-three teeth were irrigated using NaOCl and EDTA (protocol 2). Chlorhexidine (CHX) was additionally used in revision treatments in both groups. All irrigants in group 2 were activated by PUI. Mean follow-up periods were: protocol 1 = 9.2 ± 4.4 and protocol 2 = 6.6 ± 2.5 months (p < 0.0001 (chi-square test). The frequencies of the PAI(masterpoint) and PAI(follow-up) scores did not differ significantly between teeth, which received either protocol 1 or 2 (p = 0.555 and 0.138). Statistical analysis revealed no significant association between treatment success (absence of clinical symptoms and PAI(follow-up) = I or PAI(masterpoint) > PAI(follow-up) > I) and the applied protocol (success rates: protocol 1 = 72.6% vs. protocol 2 = 82.8%; p = 0.203). Furthermore, the frequency of extractions did not differ significantly between the two protocols (p = 0.102). No association was found between follow-up time and treatment success (p = 0.888). The hypothesis was not confirmed. Even though the obtained success rate was higher after supplementing the irrigation protocol with EDTA and PUI, no significance was recorded. Hence, protocol 2 was not superior to protocol 1 regarding therapy success, at least within the limited follow-up period. It may be cautiously concluded that sufficient mechanical debridement combined with passive NaOCl irrigation results in comparably high success rates compared to EDTA and PUI. Bentham Open 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4988088/ /pubmed/27583047 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210616021001375 Text en © Hertel et al.; Licensee Bentham Open https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Hertel, Moritz
Sommer, Katja
Kostka, Eckehard
Imiolczyk, Sandra Maria
Ballout, Husam
Preissner, Saskia
Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis
title Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis
title_full Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis
title_short Outcomes of Endodontic Therapy Comparing Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Ethylenediaminetetraacetate. A Retrospective Analysis
title_sort outcomes of endodontic therapy comparing conventional sodium hypochlorite irrigation with passive ultrasonic irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetate. a retrospective analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583047
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210616021001375
work_keys_str_mv AT hertelmoritz outcomesofendodontictherapycomparingconventionalsodiumhypochloriteirrigationwithpassiveultrasonicirrigationusingsodiumhypochloriteandethylenediaminetetraacetatearetrospectiveanalysis
AT sommerkatja outcomesofendodontictherapycomparingconventionalsodiumhypochloriteirrigationwithpassiveultrasonicirrigationusingsodiumhypochloriteandethylenediaminetetraacetatearetrospectiveanalysis
AT kostkaeckehard outcomesofendodontictherapycomparingconventionalsodiumhypochloriteirrigationwithpassiveultrasonicirrigationusingsodiumhypochloriteandethylenediaminetetraacetatearetrospectiveanalysis
AT imiolczyksandramaria outcomesofendodontictherapycomparingconventionalsodiumhypochloriteirrigationwithpassiveultrasonicirrigationusingsodiumhypochloriteandethylenediaminetetraacetatearetrospectiveanalysis
AT ballouthusam outcomesofendodontictherapycomparingconventionalsodiumhypochloriteirrigationwithpassiveultrasonicirrigationusingsodiumhypochloriteandethylenediaminetetraacetatearetrospectiveanalysis
AT preissnersaskia outcomesofendodontictherapycomparingconventionalsodiumhypochloriteirrigationwithpassiveultrasonicirrigationusingsodiumhypochloriteandethylenediaminetetraacetatearetrospectiveanalysis