Cargando…

Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background and study aims: Olympus recently developed a new algorithm called Omni mode that discards redundant video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Omni mode in terms of true positives (TPs) and the superiority of the Omni mode with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosoe, Naoki, Watanabe, Kenji, Miyazaki, Takako, Shimatani, Masaaki, Wakamatsu, Takahiro, Okazaki, Kazuichi, Esaki, Motohiro, Matsumoto, Takayuki, Abe, Takayuki, Kanai, Takanori, Ohtsuka, Kazuo, Watanabe, Mamoru, Ikeda, Keiichi, Tajiri, Hisao, Ohmiya, Naoki, Nakamura, Masanao, Goto, Hidemi, Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki, Ogata, Haruhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111389
_version_ 1782448480347750400
author Hosoe, Naoki
Watanabe, Kenji
Miyazaki, Takako
Shimatani, Masaaki
Wakamatsu, Takahiro
Okazaki, Kazuichi
Esaki, Motohiro
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Abe, Takayuki
Kanai, Takanori
Ohtsuka, Kazuo
Watanabe, Mamoru
Ikeda, Keiichi
Tajiri, Hisao
Ohmiya, Naoki
Nakamura, Masanao
Goto, Hidemi
Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki
Ogata, Haruhiko
author_facet Hosoe, Naoki
Watanabe, Kenji
Miyazaki, Takako
Shimatani, Masaaki
Wakamatsu, Takahiro
Okazaki, Kazuichi
Esaki, Motohiro
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Abe, Takayuki
Kanai, Takanori
Ohtsuka, Kazuo
Watanabe, Mamoru
Ikeda, Keiichi
Tajiri, Hisao
Ohmiya, Naoki
Nakamura, Masanao
Goto, Hidemi
Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki
Ogata, Haruhiko
author_sort Hosoe, Naoki
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims: Olympus recently developed a new algorithm called Omni mode that discards redundant video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Omni mode in terms of true positives (TPs) and the superiority of the Omni mode with regard to reading time against a control (ordinary ES-10 system). Patients and methods: This multicenter prospective study included 40 patients with various small bowel diseases. VCE images were evaluated by 7 readers and 3 judging committee members. Two randomly allocated readers assessed the VCE images obtained using the 2 modalities for each patient. The order of the modalities was switched between the 2 readers and the interval between readings by the same reader was 2 weeks. The judging committee predefined clinically relevant lesions as major lesions and irrelevant lesions as minor lesions. The number of TPs for major and minor lesions and the reading times were compared between the modalities. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the TP ratio of the Omni mode compared with the control was 0.9. Results: The estimated TP ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for total, major, and minor lesions were 0.87 (0.80 – 0.95), 0.93 (0.83 – 1.04), and 0.83 (0.74 – 0.94), respectively. Although non-inferiority was not demonstrated, the rate of detection of major lesions was not significantly different between the modalities. The reading time was significantly lower when using the Omni mode than when using the control. Conclusions: The Omni mode may be only appropriate for the assessment of major lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4988834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49888342016-08-18 Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial Hosoe, Naoki Watanabe, Kenji Miyazaki, Takako Shimatani, Masaaki Wakamatsu, Takahiro Okazaki, Kazuichi Esaki, Motohiro Matsumoto, Takayuki Abe, Takayuki Kanai, Takanori Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Ikeda, Keiichi Tajiri, Hisao Ohmiya, Naoki Nakamura, Masanao Goto, Hidemi Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki Ogata, Haruhiko Endosc Int Open Background and study aims: Olympus recently developed a new algorithm called Omni mode that discards redundant video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Omni mode in terms of true positives (TPs) and the superiority of the Omni mode with regard to reading time against a control (ordinary ES-10 system). Patients and methods: This multicenter prospective study included 40 patients with various small bowel diseases. VCE images were evaluated by 7 readers and 3 judging committee members. Two randomly allocated readers assessed the VCE images obtained using the 2 modalities for each patient. The order of the modalities was switched between the 2 readers and the interval between readings by the same reader was 2 weeks. The judging committee predefined clinically relevant lesions as major lesions and irrelevant lesions as minor lesions. The number of TPs for major and minor lesions and the reading times were compared between the modalities. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the TP ratio of the Omni mode compared with the control was 0.9. Results: The estimated TP ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for total, major, and minor lesions were 0.87 (0.80 – 0.95), 0.93 (0.83 – 1.04), and 0.83 (0.74 – 0.94), respectively. Although non-inferiority was not demonstrated, the rate of detection of major lesions was not significantly different between the modalities. The reading time was significantly lower when using the Omni mode than when using the control. Conclusions: The Omni mode may be only appropriate for the assessment of major lesions. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-08 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4988834/ /pubmed/27540577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111389 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Hosoe, Naoki
Watanabe, Kenji
Miyazaki, Takako
Shimatani, Masaaki
Wakamatsu, Takahiro
Okazaki, Kazuichi
Esaki, Motohiro
Matsumoto, Takayuki
Abe, Takayuki
Kanai, Takanori
Ohtsuka, Kazuo
Watanabe, Mamoru
Ikeda, Keiichi
Tajiri, Hisao
Ohmiya, Naoki
Nakamura, Masanao
Goto, Hidemi
Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki
Ogata, Haruhiko
Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of performance of the omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111389
work_keys_str_mv AT hosoenaoki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT watanabekenji evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT miyazakitakako evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shimatanimasaaki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wakamatsutakahiro evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT okazakikazuichi evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT esakimotohiro evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT matsumototakayuki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abetakayuki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kanaitakanori evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohtsukakazuo evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT watanabemamoru evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ikedakeiichi evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tajirihisao evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohmiyanaoki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nakamuramasanao evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gotohidemi evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tsujikawatomoyuki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ogataharuhiko evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial