Cargando…
Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
Background and study aims: Olympus recently developed a new algorithm called Omni mode that discards redundant video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Omni mode in terms of true positives (TPs) and the superiority of the Omni mode with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111389 |
_version_ | 1782448480347750400 |
---|---|
author | Hosoe, Naoki Watanabe, Kenji Miyazaki, Takako Shimatani, Masaaki Wakamatsu, Takahiro Okazaki, Kazuichi Esaki, Motohiro Matsumoto, Takayuki Abe, Takayuki Kanai, Takanori Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Ikeda, Keiichi Tajiri, Hisao Ohmiya, Naoki Nakamura, Masanao Goto, Hidemi Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki Ogata, Haruhiko |
author_facet | Hosoe, Naoki Watanabe, Kenji Miyazaki, Takako Shimatani, Masaaki Wakamatsu, Takahiro Okazaki, Kazuichi Esaki, Motohiro Matsumoto, Takayuki Abe, Takayuki Kanai, Takanori Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Ikeda, Keiichi Tajiri, Hisao Ohmiya, Naoki Nakamura, Masanao Goto, Hidemi Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki Ogata, Haruhiko |
author_sort | Hosoe, Naoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims: Olympus recently developed a new algorithm called Omni mode that discards redundant video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Omni mode in terms of true positives (TPs) and the superiority of the Omni mode with regard to reading time against a control (ordinary ES-10 system). Patients and methods: This multicenter prospective study included 40 patients with various small bowel diseases. VCE images were evaluated by 7 readers and 3 judging committee members. Two randomly allocated readers assessed the VCE images obtained using the 2 modalities for each patient. The order of the modalities was switched between the 2 readers and the interval between readings by the same reader was 2 weeks. The judging committee predefined clinically relevant lesions as major lesions and irrelevant lesions as minor lesions. The number of TPs for major and minor lesions and the reading times were compared between the modalities. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the TP ratio of the Omni mode compared with the control was 0.9. Results: The estimated TP ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for total, major, and minor lesions were 0.87 (0.80 – 0.95), 0.93 (0.83 – 1.04), and 0.83 (0.74 – 0.94), respectively. Although non-inferiority was not demonstrated, the rate of detection of major lesions was not significantly different between the modalities. The reading time was significantly lower when using the Omni mode than when using the control. Conclusions: The Omni mode may be only appropriate for the assessment of major lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4988834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49888342016-08-18 Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial Hosoe, Naoki Watanabe, Kenji Miyazaki, Takako Shimatani, Masaaki Wakamatsu, Takahiro Okazaki, Kazuichi Esaki, Motohiro Matsumoto, Takayuki Abe, Takayuki Kanai, Takanori Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Ikeda, Keiichi Tajiri, Hisao Ohmiya, Naoki Nakamura, Masanao Goto, Hidemi Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki Ogata, Haruhiko Endosc Int Open Background and study aims: Olympus recently developed a new algorithm called Omni mode that discards redundant video capsule endoscopy (VCE) images. The current study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Omni mode in terms of true positives (TPs) and the superiority of the Omni mode with regard to reading time against a control (ordinary ES-10 system). Patients and methods: This multicenter prospective study included 40 patients with various small bowel diseases. VCE images were evaluated by 7 readers and 3 judging committee members. Two randomly allocated readers assessed the VCE images obtained using the 2 modalities for each patient. The order of the modalities was switched between the 2 readers and the interval between readings by the same reader was 2 weeks. The judging committee predefined clinically relevant lesions as major lesions and irrelevant lesions as minor lesions. The number of TPs for major and minor lesions and the reading times were compared between the modalities. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the TP ratio of the Omni mode compared with the control was 0.9. Results: The estimated TP ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for total, major, and minor lesions were 0.87 (0.80 – 0.95), 0.93 (0.83 – 1.04), and 0.83 (0.74 – 0.94), respectively. Although non-inferiority was not demonstrated, the rate of detection of major lesions was not significantly different between the modalities. The reading time was significantly lower when using the Omni mode than when using the control. Conclusions: The Omni mode may be only appropriate for the assessment of major lesions. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-08 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4988834/ /pubmed/27540577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111389 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Hosoe, Naoki Watanabe, Kenji Miyazaki, Takako Shimatani, Masaaki Wakamatsu, Takahiro Okazaki, Kazuichi Esaki, Motohiro Matsumoto, Takayuki Abe, Takayuki Kanai, Takanori Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Ikeda, Keiichi Tajiri, Hisao Ohmiya, Naoki Nakamura, Masanao Goto, Hidemi Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki Ogata, Haruhiko Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title | Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluation of performance of the omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosoenaoki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT watanabekenji evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT miyazakitakako evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shimatanimasaaki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wakamatsutakahiro evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT okazakikazuichi evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT esakimotohiro evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT matsumototakayuki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT abetakayuki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kanaitakanori evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ohtsukakazuo evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT watanabemamoru evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ikedakeiichi evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tajirihisao evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ohmiyanaoki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nakamuramasanao evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gotohidemi evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tsujikawatomoyuki evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ogataharuhiko evaluationofperformanceoftheomnimodefordetectingvideocapsuleendoscopyimagesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |