Cargando…

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases

Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an attractive method for en bloc resection of larger flat neoplastic lesions. Experience with this method is limited in the Western World. Patients and methods: A total of 182 consecutive flat or sessile colorectal lesio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauer, Malte, Hildenbrand, Ralf, Oyama, Tsuneo, Sido, Bernd, Yahagi, Naohisa, Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111204
_version_ 1782448483540664320
author Sauer, Malte
Hildenbrand, Ralf
Oyama, Tsuneo
Sido, Bernd
Yahagi, Naohisa
Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
author_facet Sauer, Malte
Hildenbrand, Ralf
Oyama, Tsuneo
Sido, Bernd
Yahagi, Naohisa
Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
author_sort Sauer, Malte
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an attractive method for en bloc resection of larger flat neoplastic lesions. Experience with this method is limited in the Western World. Patients and methods: A total of 182 consecutive flat or sessile colorectal lesions (cecum n = 43; right-sided colon n = 65; left-sided colon n = 11, rectum: n = 63) with a size > 20 mm (mean 41.0 ± 17.4 mm) were resected in 178 patients. The data were recorded prospectively. Results: ESD was technically feasible in 85.2 % of patients with a mean procedure time of 127.5 min (± 99.8) min and a complication rate of 11.5 % (microperforation 9.3 %, delayed bleeding 2.7 %, no case of emergency surgery, 30-day mortality rate 0 %). For 155 successfully completed procedures the en bloc and R0 resection rates were 88.4 and 62.6 %. Efficacy was better for smaller lesions (20 mm to 49 mm; n = 131) than for larger lesions (50 mm to 140 mm; n = 51) with R0 rates of 70.8 vs. 40.5 % (P < 0.001) and procedure times of 92.7 ± 62.4 minutes vs. 217.0 ± 120.9 minutes (P < 0,001). Conclusions: This series confirms the efficacy of ESD for en bloc resection of colorectal lesions > 20 mm. Results are satisfactory for lesions up to 50 mm. ESD for larger lesions was associated with low R0 resection rates and very long procedure times. The clinical consequences of microperforations were minor and do not argue against the spread of ESD in the West. Meeting presentations: The data were presented in part at DDW 2014, Chicago IL, USA (Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB536)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4988858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49888582016-08-18 Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases Sauer, Malte Hildenbrand, Ralf Oyama, Tsuneo Sido, Bernd Yahagi, Naohisa Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Endosc Int Open Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an attractive method for en bloc resection of larger flat neoplastic lesions. Experience with this method is limited in the Western World. Patients and methods: A total of 182 consecutive flat or sessile colorectal lesions (cecum n = 43; right-sided colon n = 65; left-sided colon n = 11, rectum: n = 63) with a size > 20 mm (mean 41.0 ± 17.4 mm) were resected in 178 patients. The data were recorded prospectively. Results: ESD was technically feasible in 85.2 % of patients with a mean procedure time of 127.5 min (± 99.8) min and a complication rate of 11.5 % (microperforation 9.3 %, delayed bleeding 2.7 %, no case of emergency surgery, 30-day mortality rate 0 %). For 155 successfully completed procedures the en bloc and R0 resection rates were 88.4 and 62.6 %. Efficacy was better for smaller lesions (20 mm to 49 mm; n = 131) than for larger lesions (50 mm to 140 mm; n = 51) with R0 rates of 70.8 vs. 40.5 % (P < 0.001) and procedure times of 92.7 ± 62.4 minutes vs. 217.0 ± 120.9 minutes (P < 0,001). Conclusions: This series confirms the efficacy of ESD for en bloc resection of colorectal lesions > 20 mm. Results are satisfactory for lesions up to 50 mm. ESD for larger lesions was associated with low R0 resection rates and very long procedure times. The clinical consequences of microperforations were minor and do not argue against the spread of ESD in the West. Meeting presentations: The data were presented in part at DDW 2014, Chicago IL, USA (Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB536) © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-08 2016-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4988858/ /pubmed/27540580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111204 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Sauer, Malte
Hildenbrand, Ralf
Oyama, Tsuneo
Sido, Bernd
Yahagi, Naohisa
Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases
title Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases
title_full Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases
title_fullStr Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases
title_short Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases
title_sort endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: a european single-center series of 182 cases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111204
work_keys_str_mv AT sauermalte endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases
AT hildenbrandralf endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases
AT oyamatsuneo endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases
AT sidobernd endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases
AT yahaginaohisa endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases
AT dumoulinfranzludwig endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases