Cargando…
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases
Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an attractive method for en bloc resection of larger flat neoplastic lesions. Experience with this method is limited in the Western World. Patients and methods: A total of 182 consecutive flat or sessile colorectal lesio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111204 |
_version_ | 1782448483540664320 |
---|---|
author | Sauer, Malte Hildenbrand, Ralf Oyama, Tsuneo Sido, Bernd Yahagi, Naohisa Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig |
author_facet | Sauer, Malte Hildenbrand, Ralf Oyama, Tsuneo Sido, Bernd Yahagi, Naohisa Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig |
author_sort | Sauer, Malte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an attractive method for en bloc resection of larger flat neoplastic lesions. Experience with this method is limited in the Western World. Patients and methods: A total of 182 consecutive flat or sessile colorectal lesions (cecum n = 43; right-sided colon n = 65; left-sided colon n = 11, rectum: n = 63) with a size > 20 mm (mean 41.0 ± 17.4 mm) were resected in 178 patients. The data were recorded prospectively. Results: ESD was technically feasible in 85.2 % of patients with a mean procedure time of 127.5 min (± 99.8) min and a complication rate of 11.5 % (microperforation 9.3 %, delayed bleeding 2.7 %, no case of emergency surgery, 30-day mortality rate 0 %). For 155 successfully completed procedures the en bloc and R0 resection rates were 88.4 and 62.6 %. Efficacy was better for smaller lesions (20 mm to 49 mm; n = 131) than for larger lesions (50 mm to 140 mm; n = 51) with R0 rates of 70.8 vs. 40.5 % (P < 0.001) and procedure times of 92.7 ± 62.4 minutes vs. 217.0 ± 120.9 minutes (P < 0,001). Conclusions: This series confirms the efficacy of ESD for en bloc resection of colorectal lesions > 20 mm. Results are satisfactory for lesions up to 50 mm. ESD for larger lesions was associated with low R0 resection rates and very long procedure times. The clinical consequences of microperforations were minor and do not argue against the spread of ESD in the West. Meeting presentations: The data were presented in part at DDW 2014, Chicago IL, USA (Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB536) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4988858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49888582016-08-18 Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases Sauer, Malte Hildenbrand, Ralf Oyama, Tsuneo Sido, Bernd Yahagi, Naohisa Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Endosc Int Open Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an attractive method for en bloc resection of larger flat neoplastic lesions. Experience with this method is limited in the Western World. Patients and methods: A total of 182 consecutive flat or sessile colorectal lesions (cecum n = 43; right-sided colon n = 65; left-sided colon n = 11, rectum: n = 63) with a size > 20 mm (mean 41.0 ± 17.4 mm) were resected in 178 patients. The data were recorded prospectively. Results: ESD was technically feasible in 85.2 % of patients with a mean procedure time of 127.5 min (± 99.8) min and a complication rate of 11.5 % (microperforation 9.3 %, delayed bleeding 2.7 %, no case of emergency surgery, 30-day mortality rate 0 %). For 155 successfully completed procedures the en bloc and R0 resection rates were 88.4 and 62.6 %. Efficacy was better for smaller lesions (20 mm to 49 mm; n = 131) than for larger lesions (50 mm to 140 mm; n = 51) with R0 rates of 70.8 vs. 40.5 % (P < 0.001) and procedure times of 92.7 ± 62.4 minutes vs. 217.0 ± 120.9 minutes (P < 0,001). Conclusions: This series confirms the efficacy of ESD for en bloc resection of colorectal lesions > 20 mm. Results are satisfactory for lesions up to 50 mm. ESD for larger lesions was associated with low R0 resection rates and very long procedure times. The clinical consequences of microperforations were minor and do not argue against the spread of ESD in the West. Meeting presentations: The data were presented in part at DDW 2014, Chicago IL, USA (Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: AB536) © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-08 2016-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4988858/ /pubmed/27540580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111204 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Sauer, Malte Hildenbrand, Ralf Oyama, Tsuneo Sido, Bernd Yahagi, Naohisa Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases |
title | Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases |
title_full | Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases |
title_short | Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases |
title_sort | endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: a european single-center series of 182 cases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sauermalte endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases AT hildenbrandralf endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases AT oyamatsuneo endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases AT sidobernd endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases AT yahaginaohisa endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases AT dumoulinfranzludwig endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforflatorsessilecolorectalneoplasia20mmaeuropeansinglecenterseriesof182cases |