Cargando…

Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator

INTRODUCTION: One of the aims of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is to avoid postnatal scanning. However, clinicians sometimes wish to have postnatal confirmation of prenatal findings. This study’s purpose was to check whether there was indeed the added value of neonatal MRI performed in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika, Romaniuk-Doroszewska, Anna, Duczkowska, Agnieszka, Duczkowski, Marek, Iwanowska, Beata, Szkudlińska-Pawlak, Sylwia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0649-y
_version_ 1782448497904058368
author Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
Romaniuk-Doroszewska, Anna
Duczkowska, Agnieszka
Duczkowski, Marek
Iwanowska, Beata
Szkudlińska-Pawlak, Sylwia
author_facet Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
Romaniuk-Doroszewska, Anna
Duczkowska, Agnieszka
Duczkowski, Marek
Iwanowska, Beata
Szkudlińska-Pawlak, Sylwia
author_sort Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One of the aims of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is to avoid postnatal scanning. However, clinicians sometimes wish to have postnatal confirmation of prenatal findings. This study’s purpose was to check whether there was indeed the added value of neonatal MRI performed in the MR-compatible incubator (INC) after fetal examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Material consists of 25 neonates (14 girls) who underwent prenatal and postnatal MRI in a 1.5 T scanner, the latter in INC. Mean time of prenatal MRI was 30th gestational week, of postnatal MRI—16th day of life. RESULTS: In 14 cases (56 %) postnatal findings were the same as prenatal ones. In 11 (44 %) postnatal MRI showed some different/new/more precise results, in two the differences were attributed to other factors than the advantage of postnatal MRI over prenatal one. Altogether then postnatal results were partly discordant with prenatal ones in 9/25 cases (36 %). CONCLUSIONS: In most cases there was no added value of postnatal MRI as compared to prenatal one. This value lied in small details that could not have been noticed on prenatal MRI or required contrast medium administration to be noticed. On the other hand, MR examination performed with use of the dedicated neonatal coils in the MR-compatible incubator is a safe and reliable method of visualization of these small details with better spatial resolution thus helping to establish final diagnosis, treatment plan and prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4989009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49890092016-09-01 Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika Romaniuk-Doroszewska, Anna Duczkowska, Agnieszka Duczkowski, Marek Iwanowska, Beata Szkudlińska-Pawlak, Sylwia Radiol Med Magnetic Resonance Imaging INTRODUCTION: One of the aims of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is to avoid postnatal scanning. However, clinicians sometimes wish to have postnatal confirmation of prenatal findings. This study’s purpose was to check whether there was indeed the added value of neonatal MRI performed in the MR-compatible incubator (INC) after fetal examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Material consists of 25 neonates (14 girls) who underwent prenatal and postnatal MRI in a 1.5 T scanner, the latter in INC. Mean time of prenatal MRI was 30th gestational week, of postnatal MRI—16th day of life. RESULTS: In 14 cases (56 %) postnatal findings were the same as prenatal ones. In 11 (44 %) postnatal MRI showed some different/new/more precise results, in two the differences were attributed to other factors than the advantage of postnatal MRI over prenatal one. Altogether then postnatal results were partly discordant with prenatal ones in 9/25 cases (36 %). CONCLUSIONS: In most cases there was no added value of postnatal MRI as compared to prenatal one. This value lied in small details that could not have been noticed on prenatal MRI or required contrast medium administration to be noticed. On the other hand, MR examination performed with use of the dedicated neonatal coils in the MR-compatible incubator is a safe and reliable method of visualization of these small details with better spatial resolution thus helping to establish final diagnosis, treatment plan and prognosis. Springer Milan 2016-06-02 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4989009/ /pubmed/27255502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0649-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
Romaniuk-Doroszewska, Anna
Duczkowska, Agnieszka
Duczkowski, Marek
Iwanowska, Beata
Szkudlińska-Pawlak, Sylwia
Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator
title Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator
title_full Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator
title_fullStr Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator
title_full_unstemmed Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator
title_short Fetal MRI versus postnatal imaging in the MR-compatible incubator
title_sort fetal mri versus postnatal imaging in the mr-compatible incubator
topic Magnetic Resonance Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0649-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bekiesinskafigatowskamonika fetalmriversuspostnatalimaginginthemrcompatibleincubator
AT romaniukdoroszewskaanna fetalmriversuspostnatalimaginginthemrcompatibleincubator
AT duczkowskaagnieszka fetalmriversuspostnatalimaginginthemrcompatibleincubator
AT duczkowskimarek fetalmriversuspostnatalimaginginthemrcompatibleincubator
AT iwanowskabeata fetalmriversuspostnatalimaginginthemrcompatibleincubator
AT szkudlinskapawlaksylwia fetalmriversuspostnatalimaginginthemrcompatibleincubator