Cargando…
The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center
Background. The kidney transplant evaluation process for older candidates is complex due to the presence of multiple comorbid conditions. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥60 years referred to our center for kidney transplantation over a 3-year period. Variables were collected to identi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7405930 |
_version_ | 1782448504608653312 |
---|---|
author | Concepcion, Beatrice P. Forbes, Rachel C. Bian, Aihua Schaefer, Heidi M. |
author_facet | Concepcion, Beatrice P. Forbes, Rachel C. Bian, Aihua Schaefer, Heidi M. |
author_sort | Concepcion, Beatrice P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The kidney transplant evaluation process for older candidates is complex due to the presence of multiple comorbid conditions. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥60 years referred to our center for kidney transplantation over a 3-year period. Variables were collected to identify reasons for patients being turned down and to determine the number of unnecessary tests performed. Statistical analysis was performed to estimate the association between clinical predictors and listing status. Results. 345 patients were included in the statistical analysis. 31.6% of patients were turned down: 44% due to coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), or both. After adjustment for patient demographics and comorbid conditions, history of CAD, PVD, or both (OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.20, 2.56), p = 0.004), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 8.75, 95% CI (2.81, 27.20), p = 0.0002), and cancer (OR 2.59, 95% CI (1.18, 5.67), p = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of being turned down. 14.8% of patients underwent unnecessary basic testing and 9.6% underwent unnecessary supplementary testing with the charges over a 3-year period estimated at $304,337. Conclusion. A significant number of older candidates are deemed unacceptable for kidney transplantation with primary reasons cited as CAD and PVD. The overall burden of unnecessary testing is substantial and potentially avoidable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4989053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49890532016-08-30 The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center Concepcion, Beatrice P. Forbes, Rachel C. Bian, Aihua Schaefer, Heidi M. J Transplant Research Article Background. The kidney transplant evaluation process for older candidates is complex due to the presence of multiple comorbid conditions. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥60 years referred to our center for kidney transplantation over a 3-year period. Variables were collected to identify reasons for patients being turned down and to determine the number of unnecessary tests performed. Statistical analysis was performed to estimate the association between clinical predictors and listing status. Results. 345 patients were included in the statistical analysis. 31.6% of patients were turned down: 44% due to coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), or both. After adjustment for patient demographics and comorbid conditions, history of CAD, PVD, or both (OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.20, 2.56), p = 0.004), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 8.75, 95% CI (2.81, 27.20), p = 0.0002), and cancer (OR 2.59, 95% CI (1.18, 5.67), p = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of being turned down. 14.8% of patients underwent unnecessary basic testing and 9.6% underwent unnecessary supplementary testing with the charges over a 3-year period estimated at $304,337. Conclusion. A significant number of older candidates are deemed unacceptable for kidney transplantation with primary reasons cited as CAD and PVD. The overall burden of unnecessary testing is substantial and potentially avoidable. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4989053/ /pubmed/27579174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7405930 Text en Copyright © 2016 Beatrice P. Concepcion et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Concepcion, Beatrice P. Forbes, Rachel C. Bian, Aihua Schaefer, Heidi M. The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center |
title | The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center |
title_full | The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center |
title_fullStr | The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center |
title_full_unstemmed | The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center |
title_short | The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center |
title_sort | kidney transplant evaluation process in the elderly: reasons for being turned down and opportunities to improve cost-effectiveness in a single center |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7405930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT concepcionbeatricep thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter AT forbesrachelc thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter AT bianaihua thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter AT schaeferheidim thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter AT concepcionbeatricep kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter AT forbesrachelc kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter AT bianaihua kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter AT schaeferheidim kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter |