Cargando…

The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center

Background. The kidney transplant evaluation process for older candidates is complex due to the presence of multiple comorbid conditions. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥60 years referred to our center for kidney transplantation over a 3-year period. Variables were collected to identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Concepcion, Beatrice P., Forbes, Rachel C., Bian, Aihua, Schaefer, Heidi M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7405930
_version_ 1782448504608653312
author Concepcion, Beatrice P.
Forbes, Rachel C.
Bian, Aihua
Schaefer, Heidi M.
author_facet Concepcion, Beatrice P.
Forbes, Rachel C.
Bian, Aihua
Schaefer, Heidi M.
author_sort Concepcion, Beatrice P.
collection PubMed
description Background. The kidney transplant evaluation process for older candidates is complex due to the presence of multiple comorbid conditions. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥60 years referred to our center for kidney transplantation over a 3-year period. Variables were collected to identify reasons for patients being turned down and to determine the number of unnecessary tests performed. Statistical analysis was performed to estimate the association between clinical predictors and listing status. Results. 345 patients were included in the statistical analysis. 31.6% of patients were turned down: 44% due to coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), or both. After adjustment for patient demographics and comorbid conditions, history of CAD, PVD, or both (OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.20, 2.56), p = 0.004), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 8.75, 95% CI (2.81, 27.20), p = 0.0002), and cancer (OR 2.59, 95% CI (1.18, 5.67), p = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of being turned down. 14.8% of patients underwent unnecessary basic testing and 9.6% underwent unnecessary supplementary testing with the charges over a 3-year period estimated at $304,337. Conclusion. A significant number of older candidates are deemed unacceptable for kidney transplantation with primary reasons cited as CAD and PVD. The overall burden of unnecessary testing is substantial and potentially avoidable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4989053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49890532016-08-30 The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center Concepcion, Beatrice P. Forbes, Rachel C. Bian, Aihua Schaefer, Heidi M. J Transplant Research Article Background. The kidney transplant evaluation process for older candidates is complex due to the presence of multiple comorbid conditions. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥60 years referred to our center for kidney transplantation over a 3-year period. Variables were collected to identify reasons for patients being turned down and to determine the number of unnecessary tests performed. Statistical analysis was performed to estimate the association between clinical predictors and listing status. Results. 345 patients were included in the statistical analysis. 31.6% of patients were turned down: 44% due to coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), or both. After adjustment for patient demographics and comorbid conditions, history of CAD, PVD, or both (OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.20, 2.56), p = 0.004), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 8.75, 95% CI (2.81, 27.20), p = 0.0002), and cancer (OR 2.59, 95% CI (1.18, 5.67), p = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of being turned down. 14.8% of patients underwent unnecessary basic testing and 9.6% underwent unnecessary supplementary testing with the charges over a 3-year period estimated at $304,337. Conclusion. A significant number of older candidates are deemed unacceptable for kidney transplantation with primary reasons cited as CAD and PVD. The overall burden of unnecessary testing is substantial and potentially avoidable. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4989053/ /pubmed/27579174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7405930 Text en Copyright © 2016 Beatrice P. Concepcion et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Concepcion, Beatrice P.
Forbes, Rachel C.
Bian, Aihua
Schaefer, Heidi M.
The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center
title The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center
title_full The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center
title_fullStr The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center
title_full_unstemmed The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center
title_short The Kidney Transplant Evaluation Process in the Elderly: Reasons for Being Turned down and Opportunities to Improve Cost-Effectiveness in a Single Center
title_sort kidney transplant evaluation process in the elderly: reasons for being turned down and opportunities to improve cost-effectiveness in a single center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7405930
work_keys_str_mv AT concepcionbeatricep thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter
AT forbesrachelc thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter
AT bianaihua thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter
AT schaeferheidim thekidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter
AT concepcionbeatricep kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter
AT forbesrachelc kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter
AT bianaihua kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter
AT schaeferheidim kidneytransplantevaluationprocessintheelderlyreasonsforbeingturneddownandopportunitiestoimprovecosteffectivenessinasinglecenter