Cargando…

Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees

The question of why animals sometimes ingest noxious substances is crucial to understand unknown determinants of feeding behaviour. Research on risk-prone feeding behaviour has largely focused on energy budgets as animals with low energy budgets tend to ingest more aversive substances. A less explor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desmedt, Lucie, Hotier, Lucie, Giurfa, Martin, Velarde, Rodrigo, de Brito Sanchez, Maria Gabriela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27534586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31809
_version_ 1782448525994360832
author Desmedt, Lucie
Hotier, Lucie
Giurfa, Martin
Velarde, Rodrigo
de Brito Sanchez, Maria Gabriela
author_facet Desmedt, Lucie
Hotier, Lucie
Giurfa, Martin
Velarde, Rodrigo
de Brito Sanchez, Maria Gabriela
author_sort Desmedt, Lucie
collection PubMed
description The question of why animals sometimes ingest noxious substances is crucial to understand unknown determinants of feeding behaviour. Research on risk-prone feeding behaviour has largely focused on energy budgets as animals with low energy budgets tend to ingest more aversive substances. A less explored possibility is that risk-prone feeding arises from the absence of alternative feeding options, irrespectively of energy budgets. Here we contrasted these two hypotheses in late-fall and winter honey bees. We determined the toxicity of various feeding treatments and showed that when bees can choose between sucrose solution and a mixture of this sucrose solution and a noxious/unpalatable substance, they prefer the pure sucrose solution and reject the mixtures, irrespective of their energy budget. Yet, when bees were presented with a single feeding option and their escape possibilities were reduced, they consumed unexpectedly some of the previously rejected mixtures, independently of their energy budget. These findings are interpreted as a case of feeding helplessness, in which bees behave as if it were utterly helpless to avoid the potentially noxious food and consume it. They suggest that depriving bees of variable natural food sources may have the undesired consequence of increasing their acceptance of food that would be otherwise rejected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4989156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49891562016-08-30 Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees Desmedt, Lucie Hotier, Lucie Giurfa, Martin Velarde, Rodrigo de Brito Sanchez, Maria Gabriela Sci Rep Article The question of why animals sometimes ingest noxious substances is crucial to understand unknown determinants of feeding behaviour. Research on risk-prone feeding behaviour has largely focused on energy budgets as animals with low energy budgets tend to ingest more aversive substances. A less explored possibility is that risk-prone feeding arises from the absence of alternative feeding options, irrespectively of energy budgets. Here we contrasted these two hypotheses in late-fall and winter honey bees. We determined the toxicity of various feeding treatments and showed that when bees can choose between sucrose solution and a mixture of this sucrose solution and a noxious/unpalatable substance, they prefer the pure sucrose solution and reject the mixtures, irrespective of their energy budget. Yet, when bees were presented with a single feeding option and their escape possibilities were reduced, they consumed unexpectedly some of the previously rejected mixtures, independently of their energy budget. These findings are interpreted as a case of feeding helplessness, in which bees behave as if it were utterly helpless to avoid the potentially noxious food and consume it. They suggest that depriving bees of variable natural food sources may have the undesired consequence of increasing their acceptance of food that would be otherwise rejected. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4989156/ /pubmed/27534586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31809 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Desmedt, Lucie
Hotier, Lucie
Giurfa, Martin
Velarde, Rodrigo
de Brito Sanchez, Maria Gabriela
Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees
title Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees
title_full Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees
title_fullStr Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees
title_full_unstemmed Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees
title_short Absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees
title_sort absence of food alternatives promotes risk-prone feeding of unpalatable substances in honey bees
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27534586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31809
work_keys_str_mv AT desmedtlucie absenceoffoodalternativespromotesriskpronefeedingofunpalatablesubstancesinhoneybees
AT hotierlucie absenceoffoodalternativespromotesriskpronefeedingofunpalatablesubstancesinhoneybees
AT giurfamartin absenceoffoodalternativespromotesriskpronefeedingofunpalatablesubstancesinhoneybees
AT velarderodrigo absenceoffoodalternativespromotesriskpronefeedingofunpalatablesubstancesinhoneybees
AT debritosanchezmariagabriela absenceoffoodalternativespromotesriskpronefeedingofunpalatablesubstancesinhoneybees