Cargando…
Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The previous studies agree that minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has better function outcomes, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay, when compared to open-TLIF. However, there are no significance differences on operative time, complication, and r...
Autores principales: | Xie, Lei, Wu, Wen-Jian, Liang, Yu |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4989430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503024 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.187847 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
por: Kulkarni, Arvind G, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Percutaneous endoscopic versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
por: Song, Yi-Fan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
por: Villavicencio, Alan T., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion
por: Kim, Chi Heon, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
por: Hu, Xijian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)