Cargando…
Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules?
In hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), high doses per fraction are usually used and the dose delivery pattern is different from that of conventional radiation. The daily dose is usually given intermittently over a longer time compared with conventional radiotherapy. During prolonged ra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw015 |
_version_ | 1782448639579258880 |
---|---|
author | Shibamoto, Yuta Miyakawa, Akifumi Otsuka, Shinya Iwata, Hiromitsu |
author_facet | Shibamoto, Yuta Miyakawa, Akifumi Otsuka, Shinya Iwata, Hiromitsu |
author_sort | Shibamoto, Yuta |
collection | PubMed |
description | In hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), high doses per fraction are usually used and the dose delivery pattern is different from that of conventional radiation. The daily dose is usually given intermittently over a longer time compared with conventional radiotherapy. During prolonged radiation delivery, sublethal damage repair takes place, leading to the decreased effect of radiation. In in vivo tumors, however, this decrease in effect may be counterbalanced by rapid reoxygenation. Another issue related to hypofractionated SRT is the mathematical model for dose evaluation and conversion. The linear–quadratic (LQ) model and biologically effective dose (BED) have been suggested to be incorrect when used for hypofractionation. The LQ model overestimates the effect of high fractional doses of radiation. BED is particularly incorrect when used for tumor responses in vivo, since it does not take reoxygenation into account. Correction of the errors, estimated at 5–20%, associated with the use of BED is necessary when it is used for SRT. High fractional doses have been reported to exhibit effects against tumor vasculature and enhance host immunity, leading to increased antitumor effects. This may be an interesting topic that should be further investigated. Radioresistance of hypoxic tumor cells is more problematic in hypofractionated SRT, so trials of hypoxia-targeted agents are encouraged in the future. In this review, the radiobiological characteristics of hypofractionated SRT are summarized, and based on the considerations, we would like to recommend 60 Gy in eight fractions delivered three times a week for lung tumors larger than 2 cm in diameter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4990108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49901082016-08-19 Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? Shibamoto, Yuta Miyakawa, Akifumi Otsuka, Shinya Iwata, Hiromitsu J Radiat Res Invited Review for Supplement – ICRR highlights In hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), high doses per fraction are usually used and the dose delivery pattern is different from that of conventional radiation. The daily dose is usually given intermittently over a longer time compared with conventional radiotherapy. During prolonged radiation delivery, sublethal damage repair takes place, leading to the decreased effect of radiation. In in vivo tumors, however, this decrease in effect may be counterbalanced by rapid reoxygenation. Another issue related to hypofractionated SRT is the mathematical model for dose evaluation and conversion. The linear–quadratic (LQ) model and biologically effective dose (BED) have been suggested to be incorrect when used for hypofractionation. The LQ model overestimates the effect of high fractional doses of radiation. BED is particularly incorrect when used for tumor responses in vivo, since it does not take reoxygenation into account. Correction of the errors, estimated at 5–20%, associated with the use of BED is necessary when it is used for SRT. High fractional doses have been reported to exhibit effects against tumor vasculature and enhance host immunity, leading to increased antitumor effects. This may be an interesting topic that should be further investigated. Radioresistance of hypoxic tumor cells is more problematic in hypofractionated SRT, so trials of hypoxia-targeted agents are encouraged in the future. In this review, the radiobiological characteristics of hypofractionated SRT are summarized, and based on the considerations, we would like to recommend 60 Gy in eight fractions delivered three times a week for lung tumors larger than 2 cm in diameter. Oxford University Press 2016-08 2016-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4990108/ /pubmed/27006380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw015 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Invited Review for Supplement – ICRR highlights Shibamoto, Yuta Miyakawa, Akifumi Otsuka, Shinya Iwata, Hiromitsu Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? |
title | Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? |
title_full | Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? |
title_fullStr | Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? |
title_short | Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? |
title_sort | radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules? |
topic | Invited Review for Supplement – ICRR highlights |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shibamotoyuta radiobiologyofhypofractionatedstereotacticradiotherapywhataretheoptimalfractionationschedules AT miyakawaakifumi radiobiologyofhypofractionatedstereotacticradiotherapywhataretheoptimalfractionationschedules AT otsukashinya radiobiologyofhypofractionatedstereotacticradiotherapywhataretheoptimalfractionationschedules AT iwatahiromitsu radiobiologyofhypofractionatedstereotacticradiotherapywhataretheoptimalfractionationschedules |