Cargando…

A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens

The ability of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to accurately determine the concentrations of amplifiable targets makes it a promising platform for measuring copy number alterations (CNAs) in genomic biomarkers. However, its application to clinical samples, particularly formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughesman, Curtis B., Lu, X. J. David, Liu, Kelly Y. P., Zhu, Yuqi, Poh, Catherine F., Haynes, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27537682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161274
_version_ 1782448665595478016
author Hughesman, Curtis B.
Lu, X. J. David
Liu, Kelly Y. P.
Zhu, Yuqi
Poh, Catherine F.
Haynes, Charles
author_facet Hughesman, Curtis B.
Lu, X. J. David
Liu, Kelly Y. P.
Zhu, Yuqi
Poh, Catherine F.
Haynes, Charles
author_sort Hughesman, Curtis B.
collection PubMed
description The ability of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to accurately determine the concentrations of amplifiable targets makes it a promising platform for measuring copy number alterations (CNAs) in genomic biomarkers. However, its application to clinical samples, particularly formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens, will require strategies to reliably determine CNAs in DNA of limited quantity and quality. When applied to cancerous tissue, those methods must also account for global genetic instability and the associated probability that the abundance(s) of one or more chosen reference loci do not represent the average ploidy of cells comprising the specimen. Here we present an experimental design strategy and associated data analysis tool that enables accurate determination of CNAs in a panel of biomarkers using multiplexed ddPCR. The method includes strategies to optimize primer and probes design to cleanly segregate droplets in the data output from reaction wells amplifying multiple independent templates, and to correct for bias from artifacts such as DNA fragmentation. We demonstrate how a panel of reference loci can be used to determine a stable CNA-neutral benchmark. These innovations, when taken together, provide a comprehensive strategy that can be used to reliably detect biomarker CNAs in DNA extracted from either frozen or FFPE tissue biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4990255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49902552016-08-29 A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens Hughesman, Curtis B. Lu, X. J. David Liu, Kelly Y. P. Zhu, Yuqi Poh, Catherine F. Haynes, Charles PLoS One Research Article The ability of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to accurately determine the concentrations of amplifiable targets makes it a promising platform for measuring copy number alterations (CNAs) in genomic biomarkers. However, its application to clinical samples, particularly formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens, will require strategies to reliably determine CNAs in DNA of limited quantity and quality. When applied to cancerous tissue, those methods must also account for global genetic instability and the associated probability that the abundance(s) of one or more chosen reference loci do not represent the average ploidy of cells comprising the specimen. Here we present an experimental design strategy and associated data analysis tool that enables accurate determination of CNAs in a panel of biomarkers using multiplexed ddPCR. The method includes strategies to optimize primer and probes design to cleanly segregate droplets in the data output from reaction wells amplifying multiple independent templates, and to correct for bias from artifacts such as DNA fragmentation. We demonstrate how a panel of reference loci can be used to determine a stable CNA-neutral benchmark. These innovations, when taken together, provide a comprehensive strategy that can be used to reliably detect biomarker CNAs in DNA extracted from either frozen or FFPE tissue biopsies. Public Library of Science 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4990255/ /pubmed/27537682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161274 Text en © 2016 Hughesman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hughesman, Curtis B.
Lu, X. J. David
Liu, Kelly Y. P.
Zhu, Yuqi
Poh, Catherine F.
Haynes, Charles
A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens
title A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens
title_full A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens
title_fullStr A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens
title_full_unstemmed A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens
title_short A Robust Protocol for Using Multiplexed Droplet Digital PCR to Quantify Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Clinical Tissue Specimens
title_sort robust protocol for using multiplexed droplet digital pcr to quantify somatic copy number alterations in clinical tissue specimens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27537682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161274
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesmancurtisb arobustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT luxjdavid arobustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT liukellyyp arobustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT zhuyuqi arobustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT pohcatherinef arobustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT haynescharles arobustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT hughesmancurtisb robustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT luxjdavid robustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT liukellyyp robustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT zhuyuqi robustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT pohcatherinef robustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens
AT haynescharles robustprotocolforusingmultiplexeddropletdigitalpcrtoquantifysomaticcopynumberalterationsinclinicaltissuespecimens