Cargando…

Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to use the photonic imaging modality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare the marginal adaptation of composite inlays fabricated by direct and indirect techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class II cavities were prepared on 34 extracted human molar te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde, SABUNCU, Metin, ÜNAL, Sena, ÖNAL, Banu, ULUSOY, Mübin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720160012
_version_ 1782448689644568576
author TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
SABUNCU, Metin
ÜNAL, Sena
ÖNAL, Banu
ULUSOY, Mübin
author_facet TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
SABUNCU, Metin
ÜNAL, Sena
ÖNAL, Banu
ULUSOY, Mübin
author_sort TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to use the photonic imaging modality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare the marginal adaptation of composite inlays fabricated by direct and indirect techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class II cavities were prepared on 34 extracted human molar teeth. The cavities were randomly divided into two groups according to the inlay fabrication technique. The first group was directly restored on cavities with a composite (Esthet X HD, Dentsply, Germany) after isolating. The second group was indirectly restored with the same composite material. Marginal adaptations were scanned before cementation with an invisible infrared light beam of OCT (Thorlabs), allowing measurement in 200 µm intervals. Restorations were cemented with a self-adhesive cement resin (SmartCem2, Dentsply), and then marginal adaptations were again measured with OCT. Mean values were statistically compared by using independent-samples t-test and paired samples t-test (p<0.05), before and after cementation. RESULTS: Direct inlays presented statistically smaller marginal discrepancy values than indirect inlays, before (p=0.00001442) and after (p=0.00001466) cementation. Marginal discrepancy values were increased for all restorations after cementation (p=0.00008839, p=0.000000952 for direct and indirect inlays, respectively). The mean marginal discrepancy value of the direct group increased from 56.88±20.04 µm to 91.88±31.7 µm, whereas the indirect group increased from 107.54±35.63 µm to 170.29±54.83 µm. Different techniques are available to detect marginal adaptation of restorations, but the OCT system can give quantitative information about resin cement thickness and its interaction between tooth and restoration in a nondestructive manner. CONCLUSIONS: Direct inlays presented smaller marginal discrepancy than indirect inlays. The marginal discrepancy values were increased for all restorations that refer to cement thickness after cementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4990368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49903682016-08-19 Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde SABUNCU, Metin ÜNAL, Sena ÖNAL, Banu ULUSOY, Mübin J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to use the photonic imaging modality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare the marginal adaptation of composite inlays fabricated by direct and indirect techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class II cavities were prepared on 34 extracted human molar teeth. The cavities were randomly divided into two groups according to the inlay fabrication technique. The first group was directly restored on cavities with a composite (Esthet X HD, Dentsply, Germany) after isolating. The second group was indirectly restored with the same composite material. Marginal adaptations were scanned before cementation with an invisible infrared light beam of OCT (Thorlabs), allowing measurement in 200 µm intervals. Restorations were cemented with a self-adhesive cement resin (SmartCem2, Dentsply), and then marginal adaptations were again measured with OCT. Mean values were statistically compared by using independent-samples t-test and paired samples t-test (p<0.05), before and after cementation. RESULTS: Direct inlays presented statistically smaller marginal discrepancy values than indirect inlays, before (p=0.00001442) and after (p=0.00001466) cementation. Marginal discrepancy values were increased for all restorations after cementation (p=0.00008839, p=0.000000952 for direct and indirect inlays, respectively). The mean marginal discrepancy value of the direct group increased from 56.88±20.04 µm to 91.88±31.7 µm, whereas the indirect group increased from 107.54±35.63 µm to 170.29±54.83 µm. Different techniques are available to detect marginal adaptation of restorations, but the OCT system can give quantitative information about resin cement thickness and its interaction between tooth and restoration in a nondestructive manner. CONCLUSIONS: Direct inlays presented smaller marginal discrepancy than indirect inlays. The marginal discrepancy values were increased for all restorations that refer to cement thickness after cementation. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4990368/ /pubmed/27556210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720160012 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
TÜRK, Ayşe Gözde
SABUNCU, Metin
ÜNAL, Sena
ÖNAL, Banu
ULUSOY, Mübin
Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_full Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_short Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
title_sort comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720160012
work_keys_str_mv AT turkaysegozde comparisonofthemarginaladaptationofdirectandindirectcompositeinlayrestorationswithopticalcoherencetomography
AT sabuncumetin comparisonofthemarginaladaptationofdirectandindirectcompositeinlayrestorationswithopticalcoherencetomography
AT unalsena comparisonofthemarginaladaptationofdirectandindirectcompositeinlayrestorationswithopticalcoherencetomography
AT onalbanu comparisonofthemarginaladaptationofdirectandindirectcompositeinlayrestorationswithopticalcoherencetomography
AT ulusoymubin comparisonofthemarginaladaptationofdirectandindirectcompositeinlayrestorationswithopticalcoherencetomography