Cargando…

Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI

An attempt was made to compare the usefulness of determining markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) in endometrial cancer patients in whom recurrence or distant metastasis was diagnosed in observation after treatment. The study included 316 patients aged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozakiewicz, Barbara, Chądzyńska, Małgorzata, Dmoch-Gajzlerska, Ewa, Stefaniak, Małgorzata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4784-9
_version_ 1782448721880940544
author Kozakiewicz, Barbara
Chądzyńska, Małgorzata
Dmoch-Gajzlerska, Ewa
Stefaniak, Małgorzata
author_facet Kozakiewicz, Barbara
Chądzyńska, Małgorzata
Dmoch-Gajzlerska, Ewa
Stefaniak, Małgorzata
author_sort Kozakiewicz, Barbara
collection PubMed
description An attempt was made to compare the usefulness of determining markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) in endometrial cancer patients in whom recurrence or distant metastasis was diagnosed in observation after treatment. The study included 316 patients aged 32–81, average age of 61 years, SD = 8.72, with diagnosed endometrial cancer, treated between 1994 and 1995 at the Oncology Center in Warsaw and then under observation from 4 months to 17 years after completion of treatment. The levels of the markers TATI and CEA were assessed from the first five serum samples taken during postoperative radiotherapy and in the initial period of observation after completed treatment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, determining the sensitivity and specificity of both CEA and TATI in patients who experienced treatment failure, i.e., recurrence and distant metastasis. Assessing the sensitivity of the marker CEA, it was found that if in the third sample, i.e., during radiation therapy, the marker level increased by more than 20 % compared with the first sample, then recurrence of cancer occurred during the observation period in 75.9 % of patients and metastatic occurred in 69.7 % of patients. In the evaluation of the marker TATI, it was found that if the level of TATI between the first and the third sample increases by 10.6 % from the initial level, then in 84.4 % (sensitivity) of cases, this means the occurrence of cancer recurrence and in 75.7 % (sensitivity) of cases, the occurrence of metastasis. The specificity of both markers is low and not useful diagnostically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4990607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49906072016-09-01 Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI Kozakiewicz, Barbara Chądzyńska, Małgorzata Dmoch-Gajzlerska, Ewa Stefaniak, Małgorzata Tumour Biol Original Article An attempt was made to compare the usefulness of determining markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) in endometrial cancer patients in whom recurrence or distant metastasis was diagnosed in observation after treatment. The study included 316 patients aged 32–81, average age of 61 years, SD = 8.72, with diagnosed endometrial cancer, treated between 1994 and 1995 at the Oncology Center in Warsaw and then under observation from 4 months to 17 years after completion of treatment. The levels of the markers TATI and CEA were assessed from the first five serum samples taken during postoperative radiotherapy and in the initial period of observation after completed treatment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, determining the sensitivity and specificity of both CEA and TATI in patients who experienced treatment failure, i.e., recurrence and distant metastasis. Assessing the sensitivity of the marker CEA, it was found that if in the third sample, i.e., during radiation therapy, the marker level increased by more than 20 % compared with the first sample, then recurrence of cancer occurred during the observation period in 75.9 % of patients and metastatic occurred in 69.7 % of patients. In the evaluation of the marker TATI, it was found that if the level of TATI between the first and the third sample increases by 10.6 % from the initial level, then in 84.4 % (sensitivity) of cases, this means the occurrence of cancer recurrence and in 75.7 % (sensitivity) of cases, the occurrence of metastasis. The specificity of both markers is low and not useful diagnostically. Springer Netherlands 2016-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4990607/ /pubmed/26779635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4784-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kozakiewicz, Barbara
Chądzyńska, Małgorzata
Dmoch-Gajzlerska, Ewa
Stefaniak, Małgorzata
Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI
title Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI
title_full Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI
title_fullStr Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI
title_short Monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by CEA and TATI
title_sort monitoring the treatment outcome in endometrial cancer patients by cea and tati
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4784-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kozakiewiczbarbara monitoringthetreatmentoutcomeinendometrialcancerpatientsbyceaandtati
AT chadzynskamałgorzata monitoringthetreatmentoutcomeinendometrialcancerpatientsbyceaandtati
AT dmochgajzlerskaewa monitoringthetreatmentoutcomeinendometrialcancerpatientsbyceaandtati
AT stefaniakmałgorzata monitoringthetreatmentoutcomeinendometrialcancerpatientsbyceaandtati