Cargando…

Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the feasibility of six different CT-based measurement techniques for establishing an indication for derotational osteotomy in the cases of patellar instability or femoral fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of 52 single human cadaver femora were measured using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiser, Peter, Attal, René, Kammerer, Mark, Thauerer, Michael, Hamberger, Lea, Mayr, Raul, Schmoelz, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27501703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2536-3
_version_ 1782448725075951616
author Kaiser, Peter
Attal, René
Kammerer, Mark
Thauerer, Michael
Hamberger, Lea
Mayr, Raul
Schmoelz, Werner
author_facet Kaiser, Peter
Attal, René
Kammerer, Mark
Thauerer, Michael
Hamberger, Lea
Mayr, Raul
Schmoelz, Werner
author_sort Kaiser, Peter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study compared the feasibility of six different CT-based measurement techniques for establishing an indication for derotational osteotomy in the cases of patellar instability or femoral fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of 52 single human cadaver femora were measured using six different torsion measurement techniques (described by Waidelich, Murphy, and Yoshioka on transverse images and Hernandez, Jarrett, and Yoshioka on oblique images). All measurements were performed by four observers twice to assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < 0.001) between the values for femoral torsion were observed with all techniques except Yoshioka’s techniques on transverse and oblique slices (P = 1.000) (transverse images: Waidelich 22.4° ± 6.8°, Murphy 17.5° ± 7.0°, Yoshioka 13.4° ± 6.9°; oblique images: Hernandez 11.4° ± 7.4°, Jarrett 14.9° ± 7.5°, Yoshioka oblique 13.4° ± 7.1°). Intraobserver and interobserver agreement showed a high level of reproducibility (ICC 0.877–0.986; mean 0.8°–2.9°) for all techniques, with the greatest difference being observed with Hernandez’s technique (11.4°/10°). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral torsion values depend on the measurement technique. When derotational osteotomy is being considered, it is essential to use different threshold values depending on the measurement technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4990621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49906212016-09-01 Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique Kaiser, Peter Attal, René Kammerer, Mark Thauerer, Michael Hamberger, Lea Mayr, Raul Schmoelz, Werner Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Trauma Surgery INTRODUCTION: This study compared the feasibility of six different CT-based measurement techniques for establishing an indication for derotational osteotomy in the cases of patellar instability or femoral fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of 52 single human cadaver femora were measured using six different torsion measurement techniques (described by Waidelich, Murphy, and Yoshioka on transverse images and Hernandez, Jarrett, and Yoshioka on oblique images). All measurements were performed by four observers twice to assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < 0.001) between the values for femoral torsion were observed with all techniques except Yoshioka’s techniques on transverse and oblique slices (P = 1.000) (transverse images: Waidelich 22.4° ± 6.8°, Murphy 17.5° ± 7.0°, Yoshioka 13.4° ± 6.9°; oblique images: Hernandez 11.4° ± 7.4°, Jarrett 14.9° ± 7.5°, Yoshioka oblique 13.4° ± 7.1°). Intraobserver and interobserver agreement showed a high level of reproducibility (ICC 0.877–0.986; mean 0.8°–2.9°) for all techniques, with the greatest difference being observed with Hernandez’s technique (11.4°/10°). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral torsion values depend on the measurement technique. When derotational osteotomy is being considered, it is essential to use different threshold values depending on the measurement technique. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-08-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4990621/ /pubmed/27501703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2536-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Trauma Surgery
Kaiser, Peter
Attal, René
Kammerer, Mark
Thauerer, Michael
Hamberger, Lea
Mayr, Raul
Schmoelz, Werner
Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique
title Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique
title_full Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique
title_fullStr Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique
title_full_unstemmed Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique
title_short Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique
title_sort significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the ct measurement technique
topic Trauma Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27501703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2536-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserpeter significantdifferencesinfemoraltorsionvaluesdependingonthectmeasurementtechnique
AT attalrene significantdifferencesinfemoraltorsionvaluesdependingonthectmeasurementtechnique
AT kammerermark significantdifferencesinfemoraltorsionvaluesdependingonthectmeasurementtechnique
AT thauerermichael significantdifferencesinfemoraltorsionvaluesdependingonthectmeasurementtechnique
AT hambergerlea significantdifferencesinfemoraltorsionvaluesdependingonthectmeasurementtechnique
AT mayrraul significantdifferencesinfemoraltorsionvaluesdependingonthectmeasurementtechnique
AT schmoelzwerner significantdifferencesinfemoraltorsionvaluesdependingonthectmeasurementtechnique