Cargando…
Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have investigated sampling adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, none have described the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for pNENs, or the influencing factors. The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6 |
_version_ | 1782448725299298304 |
---|---|
author | Hijioka, Susumu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Imaoka, Hiroshi Bhatia, Vikram Mekky, Mohamed A. Yoshimura, Kenichi Yoshida, Tsukasa Okuno, Nozomi Hieda, Nobuhiro Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yatabe, Yasushi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Yamao, Kenji |
author_facet | Hijioka, Susumu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Imaoka, Hiroshi Bhatia, Vikram Mekky, Mohamed A. Yoshimura, Kenichi Yoshida, Tsukasa Okuno, Nozomi Hieda, Nobuhiro Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yatabe, Yasushi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Yamao, Kenji |
author_sort | Hijioka, Susumu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have investigated sampling adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, none have described the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for pNENs, or the influencing factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, with post-operative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, and factors predictive of inadequate EUS sampling. METHODS: From 1998 to 2014, a total of 698 patients underwent pancreatic resection and 1455 patients underwent EUS-FNA sampling for pancreatic lesions. A total of 410 cases underwent both surgical resection and preceding EUS-FNA. Of these, 60 cases (49 true pNEN, nine non-diagnostic, two misdiagnoses) were included. We studied diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA and factors that were associated with failed diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 60 cases, EUS-FNA yield was 49 true-positive cases, two misdiagnoses, and nine non-diagnostic cases (including six suggestive cases). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.5, 99.4, and 97.3 %, respectively; including the six suggestive cases, diagnostic values were 94.8 % sensitivity (55/58), 99.4 % specificity (350/352), and 98.7 % accuracy (405/410). In multivariate analysis, sampling adequacy rates were significantly lower when lesions were located in the pancreatic head [odds ratio (OR) = 10.0] and in tumor-rich stromal fibrosis (OR = 10.45). Tumor size, needle type, tumor grading, presence of cystic component, and time period were not significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA offers high accuracy for pNEN. However, location of the tumor in the pancreatic head and presence of rich stromal fibrosis negatively impacts sampling adequacy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4990623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49906232016-09-01 Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms Hijioka, Susumu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Imaoka, Hiroshi Bhatia, Vikram Mekky, Mohamed A. Yoshimura, Kenichi Yoshida, Tsukasa Okuno, Nozomi Hieda, Nobuhiro Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yatabe, Yasushi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Yamao, Kenji J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have investigated sampling adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, none have described the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for pNENs, or the influencing factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, with post-operative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, and factors predictive of inadequate EUS sampling. METHODS: From 1998 to 2014, a total of 698 patients underwent pancreatic resection and 1455 patients underwent EUS-FNA sampling for pancreatic lesions. A total of 410 cases underwent both surgical resection and preceding EUS-FNA. Of these, 60 cases (49 true pNEN, nine non-diagnostic, two misdiagnoses) were included. We studied diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA and factors that were associated with failed diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 60 cases, EUS-FNA yield was 49 true-positive cases, two misdiagnoses, and nine non-diagnostic cases (including six suggestive cases). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.5, 99.4, and 97.3 %, respectively; including the six suggestive cases, diagnostic values were 94.8 % sensitivity (55/58), 99.4 % specificity (350/352), and 98.7 % accuracy (405/410). In multivariate analysis, sampling adequacy rates were significantly lower when lesions were located in the pancreatic head [odds ratio (OR) = 10.0] and in tumor-rich stromal fibrosis (OR = 10.45). Tumor size, needle type, tumor grading, presence of cystic component, and time period were not significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA offers high accuracy for pNEN. However, location of the tumor in the pancreatic head and presence of rich stromal fibrosis negatively impacts sampling adequacy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Japan 2016-01-14 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4990623/ /pubmed/26768605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract Hijioka, Susumu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Imaoka, Hiroshi Bhatia, Vikram Mekky, Mohamed A. Yoshimura, Kenichi Yoshida, Tsukasa Okuno, Nozomi Hieda, Nobuhiro Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yatabe, Yasushi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Yamao, Kenji Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms |
title | Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms |
title_full | Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms |
title_short | Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms |
title_sort | diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of eus-fna of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms |
topic | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hijiokasusumu diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT harakazuo diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT mizunonobumasa diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT imaokahiroshi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT bhatiavikram diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT mekkymohameda diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT yoshimurakenichi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT yoshidatsukasa diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT okunonozomi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT hiedanobuhiro diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT tajikamasahiro diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT tanakatsutomu diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT ishiharamakoto diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT yatabeyasushi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT shimizuyasuhiro diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT niwayasumasa diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms AT yamaokenji diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms |