Cargando…

Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have investigated sampling adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, none have described the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for pNENs, or the influencing factors. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hijioka, Susumu, Hara, Kazuo, Mizuno, Nobumasa, Imaoka, Hiroshi, Bhatia, Vikram, Mekky, Mohamed A., Yoshimura, Kenichi, Yoshida, Tsukasa, Okuno, Nozomi, Hieda, Nobuhiro, Tajika, Masahiro, Tanaka, Tsutomu, Ishihara, Makoto, Yatabe, Yasushi, Shimizu, Yasuhiro, Niwa, Yasumasa, Yamao, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6
_version_ 1782448725299298304
author Hijioka, Susumu
Hara, Kazuo
Mizuno, Nobumasa
Imaoka, Hiroshi
Bhatia, Vikram
Mekky, Mohamed A.
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Yoshida, Tsukasa
Okuno, Nozomi
Hieda, Nobuhiro
Tajika, Masahiro
Tanaka, Tsutomu
Ishihara, Makoto
Yatabe, Yasushi
Shimizu, Yasuhiro
Niwa, Yasumasa
Yamao, Kenji
author_facet Hijioka, Susumu
Hara, Kazuo
Mizuno, Nobumasa
Imaoka, Hiroshi
Bhatia, Vikram
Mekky, Mohamed A.
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Yoshida, Tsukasa
Okuno, Nozomi
Hieda, Nobuhiro
Tajika, Masahiro
Tanaka, Tsutomu
Ishihara, Makoto
Yatabe, Yasushi
Shimizu, Yasuhiro
Niwa, Yasumasa
Yamao, Kenji
author_sort Hijioka, Susumu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have investigated sampling adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, none have described the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for pNENs, or the influencing factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, with post-operative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, and factors predictive of inadequate EUS sampling. METHODS: From 1998 to 2014, a total of 698 patients underwent pancreatic resection and 1455 patients underwent EUS-FNA sampling for pancreatic lesions. A total of 410 cases underwent both surgical resection and preceding EUS-FNA. Of these, 60 cases (49 true pNEN, nine non-diagnostic, two misdiagnoses) were included. We studied diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA and factors that were associated with failed diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 60 cases, EUS-FNA yield was 49 true-positive cases, two misdiagnoses, and nine non-diagnostic cases (including six suggestive cases). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.5, 99.4, and 97.3 %, respectively; including the six suggestive cases, diagnostic values were 94.8 % sensitivity (55/58), 99.4 % specificity (350/352), and 98.7 % accuracy (405/410). In multivariate analysis, sampling adequacy rates were significantly lower when lesions were located in the pancreatic head [odds ratio (OR) = 10.0] and in tumor-rich stromal fibrosis (OR = 10.45). Tumor size, needle type, tumor grading, presence of cystic component, and time period were not significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA offers high accuracy for pNEN. However, location of the tumor in the pancreatic head and presence of rich stromal fibrosis negatively impacts sampling adequacy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4990623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49906232016-09-01 Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms Hijioka, Susumu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Imaoka, Hiroshi Bhatia, Vikram Mekky, Mohamed A. Yoshimura, Kenichi Yoshida, Tsukasa Okuno, Nozomi Hieda, Nobuhiro Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yatabe, Yasushi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Yamao, Kenji J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have investigated sampling adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, none have described the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for pNENs, or the influencing factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, with post-operative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, and factors predictive of inadequate EUS sampling. METHODS: From 1998 to 2014, a total of 698 patients underwent pancreatic resection and 1455 patients underwent EUS-FNA sampling for pancreatic lesions. A total of 410 cases underwent both surgical resection and preceding EUS-FNA. Of these, 60 cases (49 true pNEN, nine non-diagnostic, two misdiagnoses) were included. We studied diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA and factors that were associated with failed diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 60 cases, EUS-FNA yield was 49 true-positive cases, two misdiagnoses, and nine non-diagnostic cases (including six suggestive cases). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.5, 99.4, and 97.3 %, respectively; including the six suggestive cases, diagnostic values were 94.8 % sensitivity (55/58), 99.4 % specificity (350/352), and 98.7 % accuracy (405/410). In multivariate analysis, sampling adequacy rates were significantly lower when lesions were located in the pancreatic head [odds ratio (OR) = 10.0] and in tumor-rich stromal fibrosis (OR = 10.45). Tumor size, needle type, tumor grading, presence of cystic component, and time period were not significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA offers high accuracy for pNEN. However, location of the tumor in the pancreatic head and presence of rich stromal fibrosis negatively impacts sampling adequacy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Japan 2016-01-14 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4990623/ /pubmed/26768605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
Hijioka, Susumu
Hara, Kazuo
Mizuno, Nobumasa
Imaoka, Hiroshi
Bhatia, Vikram
Mekky, Mohamed A.
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Yoshida, Tsukasa
Okuno, Nozomi
Hieda, Nobuhiro
Tajika, Masahiro
Tanaka, Tsutomu
Ishihara, Makoto
Yatabe, Yasushi
Shimizu, Yasuhiro
Niwa, Yasumasa
Yamao, Kenji
Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
title Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
title_full Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
title_short Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
title_sort diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of eus-fna of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
topic Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26768605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1164-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hijiokasusumu diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT harakazuo diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT mizunonobumasa diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT imaokahiroshi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT bhatiavikram diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT mekkymohameda diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT yoshimurakenichi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT yoshidatsukasa diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT okunonozomi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT hiedanobuhiro diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT tajikamasahiro diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT tanakatsutomu diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT ishiharamakoto diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT yatabeyasushi diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT shimizuyasuhiro diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT niwayasumasa diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT yamaokenji diagnosticperformanceandfactorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofeusfnaofpancreaticneuroendocrineneoplasms