Cargando…

Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England

Wild bee declines have been ascribed in part to neonicotinoid insecticides. While short-term laboratory studies on commercially bred species (principally honeybees and bumblebees) have identified sub-lethal effects, there is no strong evidence linking these insecticides to losses of the majority of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodcock, Ben A., Isaac, Nicholas J. B., Bullock, James M., Roy, David B., Garthwaite, David G., Crowe, Andrew, Pywell, Richard F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12459
_version_ 1782448735072026624
author Woodcock, Ben A.
Isaac, Nicholas J. B.
Bullock, James M.
Roy, David B.
Garthwaite, David G.
Crowe, Andrew
Pywell, Richard F.
author_facet Woodcock, Ben A.
Isaac, Nicholas J. B.
Bullock, James M.
Roy, David B.
Garthwaite, David G.
Crowe, Andrew
Pywell, Richard F.
author_sort Woodcock, Ben A.
collection PubMed
description Wild bee declines have been ascribed in part to neonicotinoid insecticides. While short-term laboratory studies on commercially bred species (principally honeybees and bumblebees) have identified sub-lethal effects, there is no strong evidence linking these insecticides to losses of the majority of wild bee species. We relate 18 years of UK national wild bee distribution data for 62 species to amounts of neonicotinoid use in oilseed rape. Using a multi-species dynamic Bayesian occupancy analysis, we find evidence of increased population extinction rates in response to neonicotinoid seed treatment use on oilseed rape. Species foraging on oilseed rape benefit from the cover of this crop, but were on average three times more negatively affected by exposure to neonicotinoids than non-crop foragers. Our results suggest that sub-lethal effects of neonicotinoids could scale up to cause losses of bee biodiversity. Restrictions on neonicotinoid use may reduce population declines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4990702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49907022016-09-01 Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England Woodcock, Ben A. Isaac, Nicholas J. B. Bullock, James M. Roy, David B. Garthwaite, David G. Crowe, Andrew Pywell, Richard F. Nat Commun Article Wild bee declines have been ascribed in part to neonicotinoid insecticides. While short-term laboratory studies on commercially bred species (principally honeybees and bumblebees) have identified sub-lethal effects, there is no strong evidence linking these insecticides to losses of the majority of wild bee species. We relate 18 years of UK national wild bee distribution data for 62 species to amounts of neonicotinoid use in oilseed rape. Using a multi-species dynamic Bayesian occupancy analysis, we find evidence of increased population extinction rates in response to neonicotinoid seed treatment use on oilseed rape. Species foraging on oilseed rape benefit from the cover of this crop, but were on average three times more negatively affected by exposure to neonicotinoids than non-crop foragers. Our results suggest that sub-lethal effects of neonicotinoids could scale up to cause losses of bee biodiversity. Restrictions on neonicotinoid use may reduce population declines. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4990702/ /pubmed/27529661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12459 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Woodcock, Ben A.
Isaac, Nicholas J. B.
Bullock, James M.
Roy, David B.
Garthwaite, David G.
Crowe, Andrew
Pywell, Richard F.
Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
title Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
title_full Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
title_fullStr Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
title_short Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
title_sort impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in england
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12459
work_keys_str_mv AT woodcockbena impactsofneonicotinoiduseonlongtermpopulationchangesinwildbeesinengland
AT isaacnicholasjb impactsofneonicotinoiduseonlongtermpopulationchangesinwildbeesinengland
AT bullockjamesm impactsofneonicotinoiduseonlongtermpopulationchangesinwildbeesinengland
AT roydavidb impactsofneonicotinoiduseonlongtermpopulationchangesinwildbeesinengland
AT garthwaitedavidg impactsofneonicotinoiduseonlongtermpopulationchangesinwildbeesinengland
AT croweandrew impactsofneonicotinoiduseonlongtermpopulationchangesinwildbeesinengland
AT pywellrichardf impactsofneonicotinoiduseonlongtermpopulationchangesinwildbeesinengland