Cargando…

Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study

BACKGROUND: The quality of patients’ recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitimana-aree, Siriporn, Udompanthurak, Suthipol, Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak, Tareerath, Matula, Wangdee, Aungsumat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7
_version_ 1782448752568565760
author Pitimana-aree, Siriporn
Udompanthurak, Suthipol
Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak
Tareerath, Matula
Wangdee, Aungsumat
author_facet Pitimana-aree, Siriporn
Udompanthurak, Suthipol
Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak
Tareerath, Matula
Wangdee, Aungsumat
author_sort Pitimana-aree, Siriporn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality of patients’ recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and was tested and validated in Caucasian patients, a population that is culturally and behaviorally different from the Thai population. The objective of this study was to translate and modify the original English-language QoR-40 into the Thai language and evaluate the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version for measuring health outcomes in Thai patients after surgery and anesthesia. METHODS: Translation was performed according to internationally recognized translation standards to ensure the integrity of the translated version. Consistent with the recommendations of 25 anesthesiologists, five questions from the original QoR-40 were excluded. The 35-item questionnaire was then translated into the Thai language and renamed the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version (Thai QoR-35). Overall, 43 outpatients and 53 inpatients rated their health and recovery status using three patient evaluation tools: 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale–Recovery (VAS-R), six-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, and Thai QoR-35. RESULTS: Overall, 90 % of patients took <10 min to complete the Thai QoR-35 questionnaire. The Thai QoR-35 and VAS-R showed good convergent validity (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Discrimination validity was supported by a significant difference in mean scores for recovery among the Thai QoR-35, VAS-R, and ADL when compared between outpatients and inpatients (P < 0.01) and also between baseline and postoperative values (P < 0.001). The Thai QoR-35 also demonstrated good reliability with high internal consistency at three time points (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88, 0.89, 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01) and a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.65 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thai QoR-35 is a valid, reliable tool for evaluating quality of recovery in Thai patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4990847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49908472016-08-20 Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study Pitimana-aree, Siriporn Udompanthurak, Suthipol Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak Tareerath, Matula Wangdee, Aungsumat BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The quality of patients’ recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and was tested and validated in Caucasian patients, a population that is culturally and behaviorally different from the Thai population. The objective of this study was to translate and modify the original English-language QoR-40 into the Thai language and evaluate the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version for measuring health outcomes in Thai patients after surgery and anesthesia. METHODS: Translation was performed according to internationally recognized translation standards to ensure the integrity of the translated version. Consistent with the recommendations of 25 anesthesiologists, five questions from the original QoR-40 were excluded. The 35-item questionnaire was then translated into the Thai language and renamed the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version (Thai QoR-35). Overall, 43 outpatients and 53 inpatients rated their health and recovery status using three patient evaluation tools: 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale–Recovery (VAS-R), six-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, and Thai QoR-35. RESULTS: Overall, 90 % of patients took <10 min to complete the Thai QoR-35 questionnaire. The Thai QoR-35 and VAS-R showed good convergent validity (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Discrimination validity was supported by a significant difference in mean scores for recovery among the Thai QoR-35, VAS-R, and ADL when compared between outpatients and inpatients (P < 0.01) and also between baseline and postoperative values (P < 0.001). The Thai QoR-35 also demonstrated good reliability with high internal consistency at three time points (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88, 0.89, 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01) and a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.65 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thai QoR-35 is a valid, reliable tool for evaluating quality of recovery in Thai patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4990847/ /pubmed/27538900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pitimana-aree, Siriporn
Udompanthurak, Suthipol
Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak
Tareerath, Matula
Wangdee, Aungsumat
Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
title Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
title_full Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
title_short Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
title_sort validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pitimanaareesiriporn validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy
AT udompanthuraksuthipol validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy
AT lapmahapaisansaowaphak validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy
AT tareerathmatula validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy
AT wangdeeaungsumat validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy