Cargando…
Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study
BACKGROUND: The quality of patients’ recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7 |
_version_ | 1782448752568565760 |
---|---|
author | Pitimana-aree, Siriporn Udompanthurak, Suthipol Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak Tareerath, Matula Wangdee, Aungsumat |
author_facet | Pitimana-aree, Siriporn Udompanthurak, Suthipol Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak Tareerath, Matula Wangdee, Aungsumat |
author_sort | Pitimana-aree, Siriporn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quality of patients’ recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and was tested and validated in Caucasian patients, a population that is culturally and behaviorally different from the Thai population. The objective of this study was to translate and modify the original English-language QoR-40 into the Thai language and evaluate the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version for measuring health outcomes in Thai patients after surgery and anesthesia. METHODS: Translation was performed according to internationally recognized translation standards to ensure the integrity of the translated version. Consistent with the recommendations of 25 anesthesiologists, five questions from the original QoR-40 were excluded. The 35-item questionnaire was then translated into the Thai language and renamed the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version (Thai QoR-35). Overall, 43 outpatients and 53 inpatients rated their health and recovery status using three patient evaluation tools: 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale–Recovery (VAS-R), six-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, and Thai QoR-35. RESULTS: Overall, 90 % of patients took <10 min to complete the Thai QoR-35 questionnaire. The Thai QoR-35 and VAS-R showed good convergent validity (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Discrimination validity was supported by a significant difference in mean scores for recovery among the Thai QoR-35, VAS-R, and ADL when compared between outpatients and inpatients (P < 0.01) and also between baseline and postoperative values (P < 0.001). The Thai QoR-35 also demonstrated good reliability with high internal consistency at three time points (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88, 0.89, 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01) and a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.65 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thai QoR-35 is a valid, reliable tool for evaluating quality of recovery in Thai patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4990847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49908472016-08-20 Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study Pitimana-aree, Siriporn Udompanthurak, Suthipol Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak Tareerath, Matula Wangdee, Aungsumat BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The quality of patients’ recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and was tested and validated in Caucasian patients, a population that is culturally and behaviorally different from the Thai population. The objective of this study was to translate and modify the original English-language QoR-40 into the Thai language and evaluate the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version for measuring health outcomes in Thai patients after surgery and anesthesia. METHODS: Translation was performed according to internationally recognized translation standards to ensure the integrity of the translated version. Consistent with the recommendations of 25 anesthesiologists, five questions from the original QoR-40 were excluded. The 35-item questionnaire was then translated into the Thai language and renamed the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version (Thai QoR-35). Overall, 43 outpatients and 53 inpatients rated their health and recovery status using three patient evaluation tools: 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale–Recovery (VAS-R), six-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, and Thai QoR-35. RESULTS: Overall, 90 % of patients took <10 min to complete the Thai QoR-35 questionnaire. The Thai QoR-35 and VAS-R showed good convergent validity (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Discrimination validity was supported by a significant difference in mean scores for recovery among the Thai QoR-35, VAS-R, and ADL when compared between outpatients and inpatients (P < 0.01) and also between baseline and postoperative values (P < 0.001). The Thai QoR-35 also demonstrated good reliability with high internal consistency at three time points (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88, 0.89, 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01) and a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.65 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thai QoR-35 is a valid, reliable tool for evaluating quality of recovery in Thai patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4990847/ /pubmed/27538900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pitimana-aree, Siriporn Udompanthurak, Suthipol Lapmahapaisan, Saowaphak Tareerath, Matula Wangdee, Aungsumat Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study |
title | Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study |
title_full | Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study |
title_short | Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study |
title_sort | validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pitimanaareesiriporn validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy AT udompanthuraksuthipol validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy AT lapmahapaisansaowaphak validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy AT tareerathmatula validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy AT wangdeeaungsumat validityandreliabilityofqualityofrecovery35thaiversionaprospectivequestionnairebasedstudy |