Cargando…
Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool
BACKGROUND: The awakening and breathing coordination, delirium, and early mobility (ABCDE) bundle is a multicomponent complex intervention that improves outcomes for critically ill adults yet is inconsistently implemented. Effective interprofessional team function (how the team interacts) is key to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2213-1 |
_version_ | 1782448755787694080 |
---|---|
author | Costa, Deena Kelly Dammeyer, Jennifer White, Matthew Galinato, Jose Hyzy, Robert Manojlovich, Milisa Sales, Anne |
author_facet | Costa, Deena Kelly Dammeyer, Jennifer White, Matthew Galinato, Jose Hyzy, Robert Manojlovich, Milisa Sales, Anne |
author_sort | Costa, Deena Kelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The awakening and breathing coordination, delirium, and early mobility (ABCDE) bundle is a multicomponent complex intervention that improves outcomes for critically ill adults yet is inconsistently implemented. Effective interprofessional team function (how the team interacts) is key to ABCDE delivery but little is known about how to measure team interactions. The purpose of our study was to examine the reliability of an observational rating tool to assess team interactions about ABCDE in one ICU. RESULTS: We pilot tested and evaluated reliability of an observational rating tool to assess team interactions about ABCDE. Two independent raters used this tool in one medical ICU over 4 weeks during morning rounds. We examined which ABCDE components were addressed, which team members initiated interactions, and which participated in interactions about ABCDE. We evaluated inter-rater reliability using Cohen’s kappa statistic and data from interprofessional team interactions for 23 patients. We demonstrated moderate to substantial reliability for whether breathing, coordination, delirium or early mobility were addressed (k = 0.48–0.78) and slight to fair reliability for which team members initiated interactions about ABCDE (0.18–0.40). Reliability was low for whether Awakening was addressed (k = −0.07) and for which team members initiated interactions about awakening (k = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides pilot evidence of reliability of an observational rating tool to assess interprofessional team interactions about ABCDE. Future work should further test and modify this tool to gain an understanding of how to use team interactions to improve ABCDE delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2213-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4990869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49908692016-08-20 Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool Costa, Deena Kelly Dammeyer, Jennifer White, Matthew Galinato, Jose Hyzy, Robert Manojlovich, Milisa Sales, Anne BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: The awakening and breathing coordination, delirium, and early mobility (ABCDE) bundle is a multicomponent complex intervention that improves outcomes for critically ill adults yet is inconsistently implemented. Effective interprofessional team function (how the team interacts) is key to ABCDE delivery but little is known about how to measure team interactions. The purpose of our study was to examine the reliability of an observational rating tool to assess team interactions about ABCDE in one ICU. RESULTS: We pilot tested and evaluated reliability of an observational rating tool to assess team interactions about ABCDE. Two independent raters used this tool in one medical ICU over 4 weeks during morning rounds. We examined which ABCDE components were addressed, which team members initiated interactions, and which participated in interactions about ABCDE. We evaluated inter-rater reliability using Cohen’s kappa statistic and data from interprofessional team interactions for 23 patients. We demonstrated moderate to substantial reliability for whether breathing, coordination, delirium or early mobility were addressed (k = 0.48–0.78) and slight to fair reliability for which team members initiated interactions about ABCDE (0.18–0.40). Reliability was low for whether Awakening was addressed (k = −0.07) and for which team members initiated interactions about awakening (k = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides pilot evidence of reliability of an observational rating tool to assess interprofessional team interactions about ABCDE. Future work should further test and modify this tool to gain an understanding of how to use team interactions to improve ABCDE delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2213-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4990869/ /pubmed/27538395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2213-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Costa, Deena Kelly Dammeyer, Jennifer White, Matthew Galinato, Jose Hyzy, Robert Manojlovich, Milisa Sales, Anne Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool |
title | Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool |
title_full | Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool |
title_fullStr | Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool |
title_short | Interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the ICU: pilot development of an observational rating tool |
title_sort | interprofessional team interactions about complex care in the icu: pilot development of an observational rating tool |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2213-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costadeenakelly interprofessionalteaminteractionsaboutcomplexcareintheicupilotdevelopmentofanobservationalratingtool AT dammeyerjennifer interprofessionalteaminteractionsaboutcomplexcareintheicupilotdevelopmentofanobservationalratingtool AT whitematthew interprofessionalteaminteractionsaboutcomplexcareintheicupilotdevelopmentofanobservationalratingtool AT galinatojose interprofessionalteaminteractionsaboutcomplexcareintheicupilotdevelopmentofanobservationalratingtool AT hyzyrobert interprofessionalteaminteractionsaboutcomplexcareintheicupilotdevelopmentofanobservationalratingtool AT manojlovichmilisa interprofessionalteaminteractionsaboutcomplexcareintheicupilotdevelopmentofanobservationalratingtool AT salesanne interprofessionalteaminteractionsaboutcomplexcareintheicupilotdevelopmentofanobservationalratingtool |