Cargando…
Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production
This article reports the first publicly available egg production costs compared across 3 hen-housing systems. We collected detailed data from 2 flock cycles from a commercial egg farm operating a conventional barn, an aviary, and an enriched colony system at the same location. The farm employed the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Poultry Science Association, Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu011 |
_version_ | 1782448760416108544 |
---|---|
author | Matthews, W. A. Sumner, D. A. |
author_facet | Matthews, W. A. Sumner, D. A. |
author_sort | Matthews, W. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article reports the first publicly available egg production costs compared across 3 hen-housing systems. We collected detailed data from 2 flock cycles from a commercial egg farm operating a conventional barn, an aviary, and an enriched colony system at the same location. The farm employed the same operational and accounting procedures for each housing system. Results provide clear evidence that egg production costs are much higher for the aviary system than the other 2 housing systems. Feed costs per dozen eggs are somewhat higher for the aviary and lower for the enriched house compared with the conventional house. Labor costs are much lower for the conventional house than the other 2, and pullet costs are much higher for the aviary. Energy and miscellaneous costs are a minimal part of total operating costs and do not differ by housing system. Total capital investments per hen-capacity are much higher for the aviary and the enriched house. Capital costs per dozen eggs depend on assumptions about appropriate interest and depreciation rates. Using the same 10% rate for each housing system shows capital costs per dozen for the aviary and the enriched housing system are much higher than capital costs per dozen for the conventional house. The aviary has average operating costs (feed, labor, pullet, energy, and miscellaneous costs that recur for each flock and vary with egg production) about 23% higher and average total costs about 36% higher compared with the conventional house. The enriched housing system has average operating costs only about 4% higher compared with the conventional house, but average total costs are 13% higher than for the conventional house. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4990890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Poultry Science Association, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49908902016-09-01 Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production Matthews, W. A. Sumner, D. A. Poult Sci Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply This article reports the first publicly available egg production costs compared across 3 hen-housing systems. We collected detailed data from 2 flock cycles from a commercial egg farm operating a conventional barn, an aviary, and an enriched colony system at the same location. The farm employed the same operational and accounting procedures for each housing system. Results provide clear evidence that egg production costs are much higher for the aviary system than the other 2 housing systems. Feed costs per dozen eggs are somewhat higher for the aviary and lower for the enriched house compared with the conventional house. Labor costs are much lower for the conventional house than the other 2, and pullet costs are much higher for the aviary. Energy and miscellaneous costs are a minimal part of total operating costs and do not differ by housing system. Total capital investments per hen-capacity are much higher for the aviary and the enriched house. Capital costs per dozen eggs depend on assumptions about appropriate interest and depreciation rates. Using the same 10% rate for each housing system shows capital costs per dozen for the aviary and the enriched housing system are much higher than capital costs per dozen for the conventional house. The aviary has average operating costs (feed, labor, pullet, energy, and miscellaneous costs that recur for each flock and vary with egg production) about 23% higher and average total costs about 36% higher compared with the conventional house. The enriched housing system has average operating costs only about 4% higher compared with the conventional house, but average total costs are 13% higher than for the conventional house. Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2014-12-05 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4990890/ /pubmed/25480736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu011 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply Matthews, W. A. Sumner, D. A. Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production |
title | Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production |
title_full | Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production |
title_fullStr | Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production |
title_short | Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production |
title_sort | effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production |
topic | Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthewswa effectsofhousingsystemonthecostsofcommercialeggproduction AT sumnerda effectsofhousingsystemonthecostsofcommercialeggproduction |