Cargando…

Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal

BACKGROUND: Newborns are at the greatest risk for dying during the intrapartum period, including labor and delivery, and the first day of life. Fetal heart rate monitoring (FHRM) and partogram use to track labor progress are evidence-based techniques that can help to identify maternal and fetal risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KC, Ashish, Wrammert, Johan, Clark, Robert B., Ewald, Uwe, Målqvist, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4991085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1034-5
_version_ 1782448795381923840
author KC, Ashish
Wrammert, Johan
Clark, Robert B.
Ewald, Uwe
Målqvist, Mats
author_facet KC, Ashish
Wrammert, Johan
Clark, Robert B.
Ewald, Uwe
Målqvist, Mats
author_sort KC, Ashish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Newborns are at the greatest risk for dying during the intrapartum period, including labor and delivery, and the first day of life. Fetal heart rate monitoring (FHRM) and partogram use to track labor progress are evidence-based techniques that can help to identify maternal and fetal risk factors so that these can be addressed early. The objective of this study was to assess health worker adherence to protocols for FHRM and partogram use during the intrapartum period, and to assess the association between adherence and intrapartum stillbirth in a tertiary hospital of Nepal. METHODS: A case-referent study was conducted over a 15-month period. Cases included all intrapartum stillbirths, while 20 % of women with live births were randomly selected on admission to make up the referent population. The frequency of FHRM and the use of partogram were measured and their association to intrapartum stillbirth was assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 4,476 women with live births were enrolled as referents and 136 with intrapartum stillbirths as cases. FHRM every 30 min was only completed in one-fourth of the deliveries, and labor progress was monitored using a partogram in just over half. With decreasing frequency of FHRM, there was an increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth; FHRM at intervals of more than 30 min resulted in a four-fold risk increase for intrapartum stillbirth (aOR 4.17, 95 % CI 2.0–8.7), and the likelihood of intrapartum stillbirth increased seven times if FHRM was performed less than every hour or not at all (aOR 7.38, 95 % CI 3.5–15.4). Additionally, there was a three-fold increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth if the partogram was not used (aOR 3.31, 95 % CI 2.0–5.4). CONCLUSION: The adherence to FHRM and partogram use was inadequate for monitoring intrapartum progress in a tertiary hospital of Nepal. There was an increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth when fetal heart rate was inadequately monitored and when the progress of labor was not monitored using a partogram. Further exploration is required in order to determine and understand the barriers to adherence; and further, to develop tools, techniques and interventions to prevent intrapartum stillbirth. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN97846009.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4991085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49910852016-08-20 Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal KC, Ashish Wrammert, Johan Clark, Robert B. Ewald, Uwe Målqvist, Mats BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Newborns are at the greatest risk for dying during the intrapartum period, including labor and delivery, and the first day of life. Fetal heart rate monitoring (FHRM) and partogram use to track labor progress are evidence-based techniques that can help to identify maternal and fetal risk factors so that these can be addressed early. The objective of this study was to assess health worker adherence to protocols for FHRM and partogram use during the intrapartum period, and to assess the association between adherence and intrapartum stillbirth in a tertiary hospital of Nepal. METHODS: A case-referent study was conducted over a 15-month period. Cases included all intrapartum stillbirths, while 20 % of women with live births were randomly selected on admission to make up the referent population. The frequency of FHRM and the use of partogram were measured and their association to intrapartum stillbirth was assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 4,476 women with live births were enrolled as referents and 136 with intrapartum stillbirths as cases. FHRM every 30 min was only completed in one-fourth of the deliveries, and labor progress was monitored using a partogram in just over half. With decreasing frequency of FHRM, there was an increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth; FHRM at intervals of more than 30 min resulted in a four-fold risk increase for intrapartum stillbirth (aOR 4.17, 95 % CI 2.0–8.7), and the likelihood of intrapartum stillbirth increased seven times if FHRM was performed less than every hour or not at all (aOR 7.38, 95 % CI 3.5–15.4). Additionally, there was a three-fold increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth if the partogram was not used (aOR 3.31, 95 % CI 2.0–5.4). CONCLUSION: The adherence to FHRM and partogram use was inadequate for monitoring intrapartum progress in a tertiary hospital of Nepal. There was an increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth when fetal heart rate was inadequately monitored and when the progress of labor was not monitored using a partogram. Further exploration is required in order to determine and understand the barriers to adherence; and further, to develop tools, techniques and interventions to prevent intrapartum stillbirth. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN97846009. BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4991085/ /pubmed/27542350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1034-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
KC, Ashish
Wrammert, Johan
Clark, Robert B.
Ewald, Uwe
Målqvist, Mats
Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal
title Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal
title_full Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal
title_fullStr Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal
title_short Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal
title_sort inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in nepal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4991085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1034-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kcashish inadequatefetalheartratemonitoringandpooruseofpartogramassociatedwithintrapartumstillbirthacasereferentstudyinnepal
AT wrammertjohan inadequatefetalheartratemonitoringandpooruseofpartogramassociatedwithintrapartumstillbirthacasereferentstudyinnepal
AT clarkrobertb inadequatefetalheartratemonitoringandpooruseofpartogramassociatedwithintrapartumstillbirthacasereferentstudyinnepal
AT ewalduwe inadequatefetalheartratemonitoringandpooruseofpartogramassociatedwithintrapartumstillbirthacasereferentstudyinnepal
AT malqvistmats inadequatefetalheartratemonitoringandpooruseofpartogramassociatedwithintrapartumstillbirthacasereferentstudyinnepal