Cargando…

Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE

BACKGROUND: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk of developing allergy. Alongside clinical history, testing modalities include skin prick tests (SPT), specific immunoglobulin-E (sp-IgE) and recently, microarray assays. The aim of this pilot study was to assess current tests and the ISAC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foong, Ru-Xin, Roberts, Graham, Fox, Adam Tobias, du Toit, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4991090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z
_version_ 1782448796128509952
author Foong, Ru-Xin
Roberts, Graham
Fox, Adam Tobias
du Toit, George
author_facet Foong, Ru-Xin
Roberts, Graham
Fox, Adam Tobias
du Toit, George
author_sort Foong, Ru-Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk of developing allergy. Alongside clinical history, testing modalities include skin prick tests (SPT), specific immunoglobulin-E (sp-IgE) and recently, microarray assays. The aim of this pilot study was to assess current tests and the ISAC sIgE-112 system in the diagnosis of food and aeroallergen allergy. METHODS: Children aged 0–11 years with moderate to severe AD were included. An initial allergy assessment including clinical history, SPT and sp-IgE was performed to determine food and aeroallergen sensitization. A second independent clinical assessment using the same information given to the first assessor and ISAC test results for food and aeroallergen sensitization was also made for each participant. The results from both were compared. RESULTS: 30 children [mean age 3.91 years (SD 3.3)] were included; 53.3 and 46.7 % had moderate and severe AD, respectively. Sp-IgE tests had a higher percentage of positive results compared to SPT and ISAC tests for common allergens. There was a significant difference between the three tests in detecting aeroallergen sensitization (p = 0.038), especially between sp-IgE and ISAC tests, but no significant difference between the tests for food allergen sensitization. There was good agreement between the two assessors; 70 % of the children had a change in diagnosis, with 60 % having at least one diagnosis added and 40 % having at least one diagnosis removed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a role for the use of ISAC testing in diagnosing sensitization and allergy in children with AD as it leads to a change in diagnosis for many patients. Further work is required to assess its clinical and cost effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4991090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49910902016-08-20 Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE Foong, Ru-Xin Roberts, Graham Fox, Adam Tobias du Toit, George Clin Mol Allergy Research BACKGROUND: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk of developing allergy. Alongside clinical history, testing modalities include skin prick tests (SPT), specific immunoglobulin-E (sp-IgE) and recently, microarray assays. The aim of this pilot study was to assess current tests and the ISAC sIgE-112 system in the diagnosis of food and aeroallergen allergy. METHODS: Children aged 0–11 years with moderate to severe AD were included. An initial allergy assessment including clinical history, SPT and sp-IgE was performed to determine food and aeroallergen sensitization. A second independent clinical assessment using the same information given to the first assessor and ISAC test results for food and aeroallergen sensitization was also made for each participant. The results from both were compared. RESULTS: 30 children [mean age 3.91 years (SD 3.3)] were included; 53.3 and 46.7 % had moderate and severe AD, respectively. Sp-IgE tests had a higher percentage of positive results compared to SPT and ISAC tests for common allergens. There was a significant difference between the three tests in detecting aeroallergen sensitization (p = 0.038), especially between sp-IgE and ISAC tests, but no significant difference between the tests for food allergen sensitization. There was good agreement between the two assessors; 70 % of the children had a change in diagnosis, with 60 % having at least one diagnosis added and 40 % having at least one diagnosis removed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a role for the use of ISAC testing in diagnosing sensitization and allergy in children with AD as it leads to a change in diagnosis for many patients. Further work is required to assess its clinical and cost effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4991090/ /pubmed/27547124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Foong, Ru-Xin
Roberts, Graham
Fox, Adam Tobias
du Toit, George
Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE
title Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE
title_full Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE
title_fullStr Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE
title_full_unstemmed Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE
title_short Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE
title_sort pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific ige
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4991090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z
work_keys_str_mv AT foongruxin pilotstudyassessingtheclinicaldiagnosisofallergyinatopicchildrenusingamicroarrayassayinadditiontoskinpricktestingandserumspecificige
AT robertsgraham pilotstudyassessingtheclinicaldiagnosisofallergyinatopicchildrenusingamicroarrayassayinadditiontoskinpricktestingandserumspecificige
AT foxadamtobias pilotstudyassessingtheclinicaldiagnosisofallergyinatopicchildrenusingamicroarrayassayinadditiontoskinpricktestingandserumspecificige
AT dutoitgeorge pilotstudyassessingtheclinicaldiagnosisofallergyinatopicchildrenusingamicroarrayassayinadditiontoskinpricktestingandserumspecificige