Cargando…
Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8 |
_version_ | 1782448936511864832 |
---|---|
author | Ströfer, Sabine Ufkes, Elze G. Noordzij, Matthijs L. Giebels, Ellen |
author_facet | Ströfer, Sabine Ufkes, Elze G. Noordzij, Matthijs L. Giebels, Ellen |
author_sort | Ströfer, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4992020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49920202016-09-06 Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting Ströfer, Sabine Ufkes, Elze G. Noordzij, Matthijs L. Giebels, Ellen Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Springer US 2016-05-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4992020/ /pubmed/27193132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Ströfer, Sabine Ufkes, Elze G. Noordzij, Matthijs L. Giebels, Ellen Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting |
title | Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting |
title_full | Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting |
title_fullStr | Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting |
title_short | Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting |
title_sort | catching a deceiver in the act: processes underlying deception in an interactive interview setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strofersabine catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting AT ufkeselzeg catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting AT noordzijmatthijsl catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting AT giebelsellen catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting |