Cargando…

Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting

Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ströfer, Sabine, Ufkes, Elze G., Noordzij, Matthijs L., Giebels, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8
_version_ 1782448936511864832
author Ströfer, Sabine
Ufkes, Elze G.
Noordzij, Matthijs L.
Giebels, Ellen
author_facet Ströfer, Sabine
Ufkes, Elze G.
Noordzij, Matthijs L.
Giebels, Ellen
author_sort Ströfer, Sabine
collection PubMed
description Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49920202016-09-06 Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting Ströfer, Sabine Ufkes, Elze G. Noordzij, Matthijs L. Giebels, Ellen Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Springer US 2016-05-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4992020/ /pubmed/27193132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Ströfer, Sabine
Ufkes, Elze G.
Noordzij, Matthijs L.
Giebels, Ellen
Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
title Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
title_full Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
title_fullStr Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
title_full_unstemmed Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
title_short Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
title_sort catching a deceiver in the act: processes underlying deception in an interactive interview setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8
work_keys_str_mv AT strofersabine catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting
AT ufkeselzeg catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting
AT noordzijmatthijsl catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting
AT giebelsellen catchingadeceiverintheactprocessesunderlyingdeceptioninaninteractiveinterviewsetting