Cargando…

Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy has been well described for benign pancreatic lesions, but its role in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains open to debate. We report our results adopting a laparoscopic technique that obeys established oncologic principles of open distal pancreatosplenectom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abu Hilal, M., Richardson, J. R. C., de Rooij, T., Dimovska, E., Al-Saati, H., Besselink, M. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4685-9
_version_ 1782448937193439232
author Abu Hilal, M.
Richardson, J. R. C.
de Rooij, T.
Dimovska, E.
Al-Saati, H.
Besselink, M. G.
author_facet Abu Hilal, M.
Richardson, J. R. C.
de Rooij, T.
Dimovska, E.
Al-Saati, H.
Besselink, M. G.
author_sort Abu Hilal, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy has been well described for benign pancreatic lesions, but its role in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains open to debate. We report our results adopting a laparoscopic technique that obeys established oncologic principles of open distal pancreatosplenectomy. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospectively kept database of 135 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic left pancreatectomy, performed across two sites in the UK and the Netherlands (07/2007–07/2015 Southampton and 10/2013–07/2015 Amsterdam). Primary outcomes were resection margin and lymph node retrieval. Secondary endpoints were other perioperative outcomes, including post-operative pancreatic fistula. Definition of radical resection was distance tumour to resection margin >1 mm. All patients underwent ‘laparoscopic radical left pancreatosplenectomy’ (LRLP) which involves ‘hanging’ the pancreas including Gerota’s fascia, followed by clockwise dissection, including formal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: LRLP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was performed in 25 patients. Seven of the 25 patients (28 %) had extended resections, including the adrenal gland (n = 3), duodenojejunal flexure (n = 2) or transverse mesocolon (n = 3). Mean age was 68 years (54–81). Conversion rate was 0 %, mean operative time 240 min and mean blood loss 340 ml. Median intensive/high care and hospital stay were 1 and 5 days, respectively. Clavien–Dindo score 3+ complication rate was 12 % and ISGPF grade B/C pancreatic fistula rate 28 %; 90-day (or in-hospital) mortality was 0 %. The pancreatic resection margin was clear in all patients, and the posterior margin was involved (<1 mm) in 6 patients, meaning an overall R0 resection rate of 76 %. No resection margin was microscopically involved. Median nodal sample was 15 nodes (3–26). With an average follow-up of 17.2 months, 1-year survival was 88 %. CONCLUSIONS: A standardised laparoscopic approach to pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the left pancreas can be adopted safely. Our study shows that these results can be reproduced across multiple sites using the same technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49920232016-09-06 Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results Abu Hilal, M. Richardson, J. R. C. de Rooij, T. Dimovska, E. Al-Saati, H. Besselink, M. G. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy has been well described for benign pancreatic lesions, but its role in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains open to debate. We report our results adopting a laparoscopic technique that obeys established oncologic principles of open distal pancreatosplenectomy. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospectively kept database of 135 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic left pancreatectomy, performed across two sites in the UK and the Netherlands (07/2007–07/2015 Southampton and 10/2013–07/2015 Amsterdam). Primary outcomes were resection margin and lymph node retrieval. Secondary endpoints were other perioperative outcomes, including post-operative pancreatic fistula. Definition of radical resection was distance tumour to resection margin >1 mm. All patients underwent ‘laparoscopic radical left pancreatosplenectomy’ (LRLP) which involves ‘hanging’ the pancreas including Gerota’s fascia, followed by clockwise dissection, including formal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: LRLP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was performed in 25 patients. Seven of the 25 patients (28 %) had extended resections, including the adrenal gland (n = 3), duodenojejunal flexure (n = 2) or transverse mesocolon (n = 3). Mean age was 68 years (54–81). Conversion rate was 0 %, mean operative time 240 min and mean blood loss 340 ml. Median intensive/high care and hospital stay were 1 and 5 days, respectively. Clavien–Dindo score 3+ complication rate was 12 % and ISGPF grade B/C pancreatic fistula rate 28 %; 90-day (or in-hospital) mortality was 0 %. The pancreatic resection margin was clear in all patients, and the posterior margin was involved (<1 mm) in 6 patients, meaning an overall R0 resection rate of 76 %. No resection margin was microscopically involved. Median nodal sample was 15 nodes (3–26). With an average follow-up of 17.2 months, 1-year survival was 88 %. CONCLUSIONS: A standardised laparoscopic approach to pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the left pancreas can be adopted safely. Our study shows that these results can be reproduced across multiple sites using the same technique. Springer US 2015-12-16 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4992023/ /pubmed/26675941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4685-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Abu Hilal, M.
Richardson, J. R. C.
de Rooij, T.
Dimovska, E.
Al-Saati, H.
Besselink, M. G.
Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results
title Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results
title_full Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results
title_fullStr Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results
title_short Laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results
title_sort laparoscopic radical ‘no-touch’ left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4685-9
work_keys_str_mv AT abuhilalm laparoscopicradicalnotouchleftpancreatosplenectomyforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomatechniqueandresults
AT richardsonjrc laparoscopicradicalnotouchleftpancreatosplenectomyforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomatechniqueandresults
AT derooijt laparoscopicradicalnotouchleftpancreatosplenectomyforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomatechniqueandresults
AT dimovskae laparoscopicradicalnotouchleftpancreatosplenectomyforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomatechniqueandresults
AT alsaatih laparoscopicradicalnotouchleftpancreatosplenectomyforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomatechniqueandresults
AT besselinkmg laparoscopicradicalnotouchleftpancreatosplenectomyforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomatechniqueandresults