Cargando…
Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
INTRODUCTION: Milrinone is an inotrope widely used for treatment of cardiac failure. Because previous meta-analyses had methodological flaws, we decided to conduct a systematic review of the effect of milrinone in critically ill adult patients with cardiac dysfunction. METHODS: This systematic revie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27448246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4449-6 |
_version_ | 1782448938569170944 |
---|---|
author | Koster, Geert Bekema, Hanneke J. Wetterslev, Jørn Gluud, Christian Keus, Frederik van der Horst, Iwan C. C. |
author_facet | Koster, Geert Bekema, Hanneke J. Wetterslev, Jørn Gluud, Christian Keus, Frederik van der Horst, Iwan C. C. |
author_sort | Koster, Geert |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Milrinone is an inotrope widely used for treatment of cardiac failure. Because previous meta-analyses had methodological flaws, we decided to conduct a systematic review of the effect of milrinone in critically ill adult patients with cardiac dysfunction. METHODS: This systematic review was performed according to The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Searches were conducted until November 2015. Patients with cardiac dysfunction were included. The primary outcome was serious adverse events (SAE) including mortality at maximum follow-up. The risk of bias was evaluated and trial sequential analyses were conducted. The quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. RESULTS: A total of 31 randomised clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 16 provided data for our analyses. All trials were at high risk of bias, and none reported the primary composite outcome SAE. Fourteen trials with 1611 randomised patients reported mortality data at maximum follow-up (RR 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.76–1.21). Milrinone did not significantly affect other patient-centred outcomes. All analyses displayed statistical and/or clinical heterogeneity of patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and/or settings and all featured missing data. DISCUSSION: The current evidence on the use of milrinone in critically ill adult patients with cardiac dysfunction suffers from considerable risks of both bias and random error and demonstrates no benefits. The use of milrinone for the treatment of critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction can be neither recommended nor refuted. Future randomised clinical trials need to be sufficiently large and designed to have low risk of bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4449-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4992029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49920292016-09-06 Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Koster, Geert Bekema, Hanneke J. Wetterslev, Jørn Gluud, Christian Keus, Frederik van der Horst, Iwan C. C. Intensive Care Med Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: Milrinone is an inotrope widely used for treatment of cardiac failure. Because previous meta-analyses had methodological flaws, we decided to conduct a systematic review of the effect of milrinone in critically ill adult patients with cardiac dysfunction. METHODS: This systematic review was performed according to The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Searches were conducted until November 2015. Patients with cardiac dysfunction were included. The primary outcome was serious adverse events (SAE) including mortality at maximum follow-up. The risk of bias was evaluated and trial sequential analyses were conducted. The quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. RESULTS: A total of 31 randomised clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 16 provided data for our analyses. All trials were at high risk of bias, and none reported the primary composite outcome SAE. Fourteen trials with 1611 randomised patients reported mortality data at maximum follow-up (RR 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.76–1.21). Milrinone did not significantly affect other patient-centred outcomes. All analyses displayed statistical and/or clinical heterogeneity of patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and/or settings and all featured missing data. DISCUSSION: The current evidence on the use of milrinone in critically ill adult patients with cardiac dysfunction suffers from considerable risks of both bias and random error and demonstrates no benefits. The use of milrinone for the treatment of critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction can be neither recommended nor refuted. Future randomised clinical trials need to be sufficiently large and designed to have low risk of bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4449-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-07-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4992029/ /pubmed/27448246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4449-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Koster, Geert Bekema, Hanneke J. Wetterslev, Jørn Gluud, Christian Keus, Frederik van der Horst, Iwan C. C. Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title | Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27448246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4449-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kostergeert milrinoneforcardiacdysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT bekemahannekej milrinoneforcardiacdysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT wetterslevjørn milrinoneforcardiacdysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT gluudchristian milrinoneforcardiacdysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT keusfrederik milrinoneforcardiacdysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT vanderhorstiwancc milrinoneforcardiacdysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsasystematicreviewofrandomisedclinicaltrialswithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis |