Cargando…

Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of the cyclopentolate 1% on the cylindrical and spherical components of the refraction. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-five eyes of 195 subjects, including 74 males and 121 females, aged from 3 to 59 years were refracted before and 30 min after cyclopentolate 1% eye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asharlous, Amir, Hashemi, Hassan, Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim, Mirzajani, Ali, Yekta, Abbasali, Nabovati, Payam, Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.05.003
_version_ 1782448953092997120
author Asharlous, Amir
Hashemi, Hassan
Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
Mirzajani, Ali
Yekta, Abbasali
Nabovati, Payam
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
author_facet Asharlous, Amir
Hashemi, Hassan
Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
Mirzajani, Ali
Yekta, Abbasali
Nabovati, Payam
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
author_sort Asharlous, Amir
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the effect of the cyclopentolate 1% on the cylindrical and spherical components of the refraction. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-five eyes of 195 subjects, including 74 males and 121 females, aged from 3 to 59 years were refracted before and 30 min after cyclopentolate 1% eye drop instillation. To compare cylindrical data, power vector analysis (J(0) and J(45) cross cylinder) was applied. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference between the J(0) values of the noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction was revealed (P = 0.006) while the J(45) values did not significantly differ. 95% limit of agreement for dry and cycloplegic values of the J(0) and J(45) were −0.22 to 0.25 and −0.19 to 0.20, respectively. Astigmatism difference was separately analyzed in emmetropic, myopic and hyperopic eyes. The J(0) difference was significant (P = 0.014) only in hyperopic eyes. Spherical equivalent (SE) values in cycloplegic refraction were significantly more hyperopic than those yielded in dry refraction by mean difference of +1.16 ± 1.20 diopters (P < 0.0001). Spherical equivalent difference (SED) values were negatively correlated with age. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that cycloplegic drops caused a statistically significant shift in the “with the rule” and “against the rule” astigmatisms, although the oblique astigmatisms remained unaffected. Further research with larger sample sizes are needed to answer what mechanisms are involved in changing cylinder with cycloplegia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49921112016-08-30 Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia? Asharlous, Amir Hashemi, Hassan Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Mirzajani, Ali Yekta, Abbasali Nabovati, Payam Khabazkhoob, Mehdi J Curr Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To determine the effect of the cyclopentolate 1% on the cylindrical and spherical components of the refraction. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-five eyes of 195 subjects, including 74 males and 121 females, aged from 3 to 59 years were refracted before and 30 min after cyclopentolate 1% eye drop instillation. To compare cylindrical data, power vector analysis (J(0) and J(45) cross cylinder) was applied. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference between the J(0) values of the noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction was revealed (P = 0.006) while the J(45) values did not significantly differ. 95% limit of agreement for dry and cycloplegic values of the J(0) and J(45) were −0.22 to 0.25 and −0.19 to 0.20, respectively. Astigmatism difference was separately analyzed in emmetropic, myopic and hyperopic eyes. The J(0) difference was significant (P = 0.014) only in hyperopic eyes. Spherical equivalent (SE) values in cycloplegic refraction were significantly more hyperopic than those yielded in dry refraction by mean difference of +1.16 ± 1.20 diopters (P < 0.0001). Spherical equivalent difference (SED) values were negatively correlated with age. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that cycloplegic drops caused a statistically significant shift in the “with the rule” and “against the rule” astigmatisms, although the oblique astigmatisms remained unaffected. Further research with larger sample sizes are needed to answer what mechanisms are involved in changing cylinder with cycloplegia. Elsevier 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4992111/ /pubmed/27579457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.05.003 Text en Copyright © 2016, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Asharlous, Amir
Hashemi, Hassan
Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
Mirzajani, Ali
Yekta, Abbasali
Nabovati, Payam
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?
title Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?
title_full Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?
title_fullStr Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?
title_full_unstemmed Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?
title_short Does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?
title_sort does astigmatism alter with cycloplegia?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT asharlousamir doesastigmatismalterwithcycloplegia
AT hashemihassan doesastigmatismalterwithcycloplegia
AT jafarzadehpurebrahim doesastigmatismalterwithcycloplegia
AT mirzajaniali doesastigmatismalterwithcycloplegia
AT yektaabbasali doesastigmatismalterwithcycloplegia
AT nabovatipayam doesastigmatismalterwithcycloplegia
AT khabazkhoobmehdi doesastigmatismalterwithcycloplegia