Cargando…
Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
BACKGROUND: With the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupation...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4 |
_version_ | 1782448969916350464 |
---|---|
author | Pedersen, Scott J. Kitic, Cecilia M. Bird, Marie-Louise Mainsbridge, Casey P. Cooley, P. Dean |
author_facet | Pedersen, Scott J. Kitic, Cecilia M. Bird, Marie-Louise Mainsbridge, Casey P. Cooley, P. Dean |
author_sort | Pedersen, Scott J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire that asks employees to recount the percentage of work time they spend in the seated, standing, and walking postures during a typical workday. METHODS: Three separate cohort samples (N = 236) were drawn from a population of government desk-based employees across several departmental agencies. These volunteers were part of a larger state-wide intervention study. Workplace sitting and physical activity behaviour was measured both subjectively against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and objectively against ActivPal accelerometers before the intervention began. Criterion validity and concurrent validity for each of the three posture categories were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, and a bias comparison with 95 % limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability of the survey was reported with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Criterion validity for this survey was strong for sitting and standing estimates, but weak for walking. Participants significantly overestimated the amount of walking they did at work. Concurrent validity was moderate for sitting and standing, but low for walking. Test-retest reliability of this survey proved to be questionable for our sample. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings we must caution occupational health and safety professionals about the use of employee self-report data to estimate workplace physical activity. While the survey produced accurate measurements for time spent sitting at work it was more difficult for employees to estimate their workplace physical activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4992189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49921892016-08-21 Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers Pedersen, Scott J. Kitic, Cecilia M. Bird, Marie-Louise Mainsbridge, Casey P. Cooley, P. Dean BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: With the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire that asks employees to recount the percentage of work time they spend in the seated, standing, and walking postures during a typical workday. METHODS: Three separate cohort samples (N = 236) were drawn from a population of government desk-based employees across several departmental agencies. These volunteers were part of a larger state-wide intervention study. Workplace sitting and physical activity behaviour was measured both subjectively against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and objectively against ActivPal accelerometers before the intervention began. Criterion validity and concurrent validity for each of the three posture categories were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, and a bias comparison with 95 % limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability of the survey was reported with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Criterion validity for this survey was strong for sitting and standing estimates, but weak for walking. Participants significantly overestimated the amount of walking they did at work. Concurrent validity was moderate for sitting and standing, but low for walking. Test-retest reliability of this survey proved to be questionable for our sample. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings we must caution occupational health and safety professionals about the use of employee self-report data to estimate workplace physical activity. While the survey produced accurate measurements for time spent sitting at work it was more difficult for employees to estimate their workplace physical activity. BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4992189/ /pubmed/27542603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pedersen, Scott J. Kitic, Cecilia M. Bird, Marie-Louise Mainsbridge, Casey P. Cooley, P. Dean Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers |
title | Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers |
title_full | Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers |
title_fullStr | Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers |
title_short | Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers |
title_sort | is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedersenscottj isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers AT kiticceciliam isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers AT birdmarielouise isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers AT mainsbridgecaseyp isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers AT cooleypdean isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers |