Cargando…

Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers

BACKGROUND: With the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedersen, Scott J., Kitic, Cecilia M., Bird, Marie-Louise, Mainsbridge, Casey P., Cooley, P. Dean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4
_version_ 1782448969916350464
author Pedersen, Scott J.
Kitic, Cecilia M.
Bird, Marie-Louise
Mainsbridge, Casey P.
Cooley, P. Dean
author_facet Pedersen, Scott J.
Kitic, Cecilia M.
Bird, Marie-Louise
Mainsbridge, Casey P.
Cooley, P. Dean
author_sort Pedersen, Scott J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire that asks employees to recount the percentage of work time they spend in the seated, standing, and walking postures during a typical workday. METHODS: Three separate cohort samples (N = 236) were drawn from a population of government desk-based employees across several departmental agencies. These volunteers were part of a larger state-wide intervention study. Workplace sitting and physical activity behaviour was measured both subjectively against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and objectively against ActivPal accelerometers before the intervention began. Criterion validity and concurrent validity for each of the three posture categories were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, and a bias comparison with 95 % limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability of the survey was reported with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Criterion validity for this survey was strong for sitting and standing estimates, but weak for walking. Participants significantly overestimated the amount of walking they did at work. Concurrent validity was moderate for sitting and standing, but low for walking. Test-retest reliability of this survey proved to be questionable for our sample. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings we must caution occupational health and safety professionals about the use of employee self-report data to estimate workplace physical activity. While the survey produced accurate measurements for time spent sitting at work it was more difficult for employees to estimate their workplace physical activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49921892016-08-21 Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers Pedersen, Scott J. Kitic, Cecilia M. Bird, Marie-Louise Mainsbridge, Casey P. Cooley, P. Dean BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: With the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire that asks employees to recount the percentage of work time they spend in the seated, standing, and walking postures during a typical workday. METHODS: Three separate cohort samples (N = 236) were drawn from a population of government desk-based employees across several departmental agencies. These volunteers were part of a larger state-wide intervention study. Workplace sitting and physical activity behaviour was measured both subjectively against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and objectively against ActivPal accelerometers before the intervention began. Criterion validity and concurrent validity for each of the three posture categories were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, and a bias comparison with 95 % limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability of the survey was reported with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Criterion validity for this survey was strong for sitting and standing estimates, but weak for walking. Participants significantly overestimated the amount of walking they did at work. Concurrent validity was moderate for sitting and standing, but low for walking. Test-retest reliability of this survey proved to be questionable for our sample. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings we must caution occupational health and safety professionals about the use of employee self-report data to estimate workplace physical activity. While the survey produced accurate measurements for time spent sitting at work it was more difficult for employees to estimate their workplace physical activity. BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4992189/ /pubmed/27542603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pedersen, Scott J.
Kitic, Cecilia M.
Bird, Marie-Louise
Mainsbridge, Casey P.
Cooley, P. Dean
Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
title Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
title_full Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
title_fullStr Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
title_full_unstemmed Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
title_short Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
title_sort is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pedersenscottj isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers
AT kiticceciliam isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers
AT birdmarielouise isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers
AT mainsbridgecaseyp isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers
AT cooleypdean isselfreportingworkplaceactivityworthwhilevalidityandreliabilityofoccupationalsittingandphysicalactivityquestionnaireindeskbasedworkers