Cargando…

False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is paramount for patient management. The wrong diagnosis places patients at risk, delays treatment, and/ or contributes to transmission of infection in the healthcare setting. Although amplification of the toxin B gene by polyme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murad, Yanal M., Perez, Justo, Ybazeta, Gustavo, Mavin, Sarah, Lefebvre, Sebastien, Weese, J. Scott, Rousseau, Joyce, Diaz-Mitoma, Francisco, Nokhbeh, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27543102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1741-6
_version_ 1782448977413668864
author Murad, Yanal M.
Perez, Justo
Ybazeta, Gustavo
Mavin, Sarah
Lefebvre, Sebastien
Weese, J. Scott
Rousseau, Joyce
Diaz-Mitoma, Francisco
Nokhbeh, Reza
author_facet Murad, Yanal M.
Perez, Justo
Ybazeta, Gustavo
Mavin, Sarah
Lefebvre, Sebastien
Weese, J. Scott
Rousseau, Joyce
Diaz-Mitoma, Francisco
Nokhbeh, Reza
author_sort Murad, Yanal M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is paramount for patient management. The wrong diagnosis places patients at risk, delays treatment, and/ or contributes to transmission of infection in the healthcare setting. Although amplification of the toxin B gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive method for detecting toxigenic C. difficile, false negative results still occur and could impact the diagnosis and treatment of this infection. METHODS: This study investigated 48 patients that tested negative for toxigenic C. difficile via GeneXpert C. difficile epi test, while simultaneously testing positive for toxigenic C. difficile via stool culture. Fifty discrepant samples were collected over a 15-month period and all C. difficile isolates were characterized by ribotype. Patient charts were reviewed to assess whether discrepant results impacted the treatment course or clinical outcome of affected patients. RESULTS: Fifty samples of a total of 2308 samples tested in an acute healthcare facility over a 15-month period had negative PCR and positive stool culture for toxigenic C. difficile. C. difficile isolated from the discrepant samples resulted in diverse ribotyping patterns suggesting they were derived from different strains. The samples belonged to patients who were distributed evenly between age groups and wards in the hospital. In the majority of cases, the false negative C. difficile test results did not seem to impact the clinical outcome in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR limit of detection may impact the results of molecular methods for C. difficile detection. Both clinical and analytical sensitivity of C. difficile tests should be considered when deciding which diagnostic assay to use, and clinical correlates should be examined carefully before excluding CDI as a cause of disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49922222016-08-31 False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing Murad, Yanal M. Perez, Justo Ybazeta, Gustavo Mavin, Sarah Lefebvre, Sebastien Weese, J. Scott Rousseau, Joyce Diaz-Mitoma, Francisco Nokhbeh, Reza BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is paramount for patient management. The wrong diagnosis places patients at risk, delays treatment, and/ or contributes to transmission of infection in the healthcare setting. Although amplification of the toxin B gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive method for detecting toxigenic C. difficile, false negative results still occur and could impact the diagnosis and treatment of this infection. METHODS: This study investigated 48 patients that tested negative for toxigenic C. difficile via GeneXpert C. difficile epi test, while simultaneously testing positive for toxigenic C. difficile via stool culture. Fifty discrepant samples were collected over a 15-month period and all C. difficile isolates were characterized by ribotype. Patient charts were reviewed to assess whether discrepant results impacted the treatment course or clinical outcome of affected patients. RESULTS: Fifty samples of a total of 2308 samples tested in an acute healthcare facility over a 15-month period had negative PCR and positive stool culture for toxigenic C. difficile. C. difficile isolated from the discrepant samples resulted in diverse ribotyping patterns suggesting they were derived from different strains. The samples belonged to patients who were distributed evenly between age groups and wards in the hospital. In the majority of cases, the false negative C. difficile test results did not seem to impact the clinical outcome in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR limit of detection may impact the results of molecular methods for C. difficile detection. Both clinical and analytical sensitivity of C. difficile tests should be considered when deciding which diagnostic assay to use, and clinical correlates should be examined carefully before excluding CDI as a cause of disease. BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4992222/ /pubmed/27543102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1741-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murad, Yanal M.
Perez, Justo
Ybazeta, Gustavo
Mavin, Sarah
Lefebvre, Sebastien
Weese, J. Scott
Rousseau, Joyce
Diaz-Mitoma, Francisco
Nokhbeh, Reza
False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing
title False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing
title_full False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing
title_fullStr False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing
title_full_unstemmed False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing
title_short False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing
title_sort false negative results in clostridium difficile testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27543102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1741-6
work_keys_str_mv AT muradyanalm falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT perezjusto falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT ybazetagustavo falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT mavinsarah falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT lefebvresebastien falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT weesejscott falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT rousseaujoyce falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT diazmitomafrancisco falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting
AT nokhbehreza falsenegativeresultsinclostridiumdifficiletesting