Cargando…

Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in developed nations. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a clinically effective treatment for people with end-stage knee OA, and represents one of the highest volume medical interventions globally. However, up to one in three patients re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dowsey, Michelle M., Scott, Anthony, Nelson, Elizabeth A., Li, Jinhu, Sundararajan, Vijaya, Nikpour, Mandana, Choong, Peter F. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1536-5
_version_ 1782448980943175680
author Dowsey, Michelle M.
Scott, Anthony
Nelson, Elizabeth A.
Li, Jinhu
Sundararajan, Vijaya
Nikpour, Mandana
Choong, Peter F. M.
author_facet Dowsey, Michelle M.
Scott, Anthony
Nelson, Elizabeth A.
Li, Jinhu
Sundararajan, Vijaya
Nikpour, Mandana
Choong, Peter F. M.
author_sort Dowsey, Michelle M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in developed nations. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a clinically effective treatment for people with end-stage knee OA, and represents one of the highest volume medical interventions globally. However, up to one in three patients remain dissatisfied following TKA. Research indicates that the strongest predictor of patient dissatisfaction following TKA is unmet expectations. This study will use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) provided to patients to improve knowledge of the expected outcomes of TKA. This increased knowledge is based on actual outcome data and is hypothesised to optimise patient expectations of TKA outcomes, thereby increasing their satisfaction and self-reported health outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred and thirty-two people with end-stage OA on the waiting list for TKA will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of two groups using computer-generated block randomisation. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) adhering to SPIRIT and CONSORT guidelines will evaluate the effect of administering a DCE prior to surgery on patient-reported pain and function and satisfaction following TKA. Patients in the intervention arm will complete a survey containing the DCE, compared to the control group who will complete a modified survey that does not contain the DCE activity. The DCE contains information on actual risks of postoperative complications, as well as health status after TKA. The DCE encourages patients to actively make trade-offs between risks and health outcomes to elicit their preferences. Participants in both groups will be required to complete the survey after consenting to have the procedure, but prior to surgery during their routine preadmission appointment at St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (SVHM). Patients in both the intervention and control groups will also be required to complete a brief patient expectation survey 1 week prior to scheduled TKA. In addition, orthopaedic surgeons will complete a brief expectations survey for each patient consented for TKA to compare matched surgeon and patient expectations for recovery following TKA. Primary outcomes will be evaluated by a blinded examiner at 12 months post surgery using a validated self-reported pain and physical function scale, and a validated patient satisfaction scale. Secondary outcomes will include a range of validated measures of health and psychological wellbeing. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using linear regression models. DISCUSSION: This study is the first of its kind to use a DCE to provide information to patients to optimise their expectations of the outcomes of surgery. Reducing the rate of patient dissatisfaction commonly seen in patients following TKA will help to reduce the burden associated with poor outcomes on the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001226594p). Version 1; registered on 9 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49922372016-08-21 Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Dowsey, Michelle M. Scott, Anthony Nelson, Elizabeth A. Li, Jinhu Sundararajan, Vijaya Nikpour, Mandana Choong, Peter F. M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in developed nations. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a clinically effective treatment for people with end-stage knee OA, and represents one of the highest volume medical interventions globally. However, up to one in three patients remain dissatisfied following TKA. Research indicates that the strongest predictor of patient dissatisfaction following TKA is unmet expectations. This study will use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) provided to patients to improve knowledge of the expected outcomes of TKA. This increased knowledge is based on actual outcome data and is hypothesised to optimise patient expectations of TKA outcomes, thereby increasing their satisfaction and self-reported health outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred and thirty-two people with end-stage OA on the waiting list for TKA will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of two groups using computer-generated block randomisation. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) adhering to SPIRIT and CONSORT guidelines will evaluate the effect of administering a DCE prior to surgery on patient-reported pain and function and satisfaction following TKA. Patients in the intervention arm will complete a survey containing the DCE, compared to the control group who will complete a modified survey that does not contain the DCE activity. The DCE contains information on actual risks of postoperative complications, as well as health status after TKA. The DCE encourages patients to actively make trade-offs between risks and health outcomes to elicit their preferences. Participants in both groups will be required to complete the survey after consenting to have the procedure, but prior to surgery during their routine preadmission appointment at St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (SVHM). Patients in both the intervention and control groups will also be required to complete a brief patient expectation survey 1 week prior to scheduled TKA. In addition, orthopaedic surgeons will complete a brief expectations survey for each patient consented for TKA to compare matched surgeon and patient expectations for recovery following TKA. Primary outcomes will be evaluated by a blinded examiner at 12 months post surgery using a validated self-reported pain and physical function scale, and a validated patient satisfaction scale. Secondary outcomes will include a range of validated measures of health and psychological wellbeing. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using linear regression models. DISCUSSION: This study is the first of its kind to use a DCE to provide information to patients to optimise their expectations of the outcomes of surgery. Reducing the rate of patient dissatisfaction commonly seen in patients following TKA will help to reduce the burden associated with poor outcomes on the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001226594p). Version 1; registered on 9 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4992237/ /pubmed/27542601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1536-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Dowsey, Michelle M.
Scott, Anthony
Nelson, Elizabeth A.
Li, Jinhu
Sundararajan, Vijaya
Nikpour, Mandana
Choong, Peter F. M.
Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1536-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dowseymichellem usingdiscretechoiceexperimentsasadecisionaidintotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT scottanthony usingdiscretechoiceexperimentsasadecisionaidintotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nelsonelizabetha usingdiscretechoiceexperimentsasadecisionaidintotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lijinhu usingdiscretechoiceexperimentsasadecisionaidintotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sundararajanvijaya usingdiscretechoiceexperimentsasadecisionaidintotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nikpourmandana usingdiscretechoiceexperimentsasadecisionaidintotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT choongpeterfm usingdiscretechoiceexperimentsasadecisionaidintotalkneearthroplastystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial