Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
BACKGROUND: COPD-6™ is a lung function testing device for a rapid pre-spirometry testing to screen-out at-risk individuals not having COPD and indicating those at risk. The aim of this study was to validate COPD-6™ lung function testing (index test) in general practice in discriminating patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0518-8 |
_version_ | 1782449001179643904 |
---|---|
author | Labor, Marina Vrbica, Žarko Gudelj, Ivan Labor, Slavica Plavec, Davor |
author_facet | Labor, Marina Vrbica, Žarko Gudelj, Ivan Labor, Slavica Plavec, Davor |
author_sort | Labor, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COPD-6™ is a lung function testing device for a rapid pre-spirometry testing to screen-out at-risk individuals not having COPD and indicating those at risk. The aim of this study was to validate COPD-6™ lung function testing (index test) in general practice in discriminating patients with COPD out of the population at risk - smokers/ex-smokers with no previous diagnosis of COPD, using measurements at tertiary care as reference standard. METHODS: Consecutive 227 subjects (115 women, 185 smokers/42 ex-smokers, ≥20 pack-years) with no previous diagnosis of COPD, aged 52.5 (SD 6.8) years from 26 general practitioners (GPs) were recruited, lung function tested with COPD-6™, referred to the tertiary institution for repeated COPD-6™ testing followed by spirometry with a bronchodilator (salbutamol), examination, and pulmonologist consultation for the diagnosis and severity of COPD. RESULTS: COPD was diagnosed in 43 subjects (18.9 %), with an AUC of 0.827 (95 % CI 0.769-0.875, P < 0.001) for the diagnosis of COPD when lung function was measured using COPD-6™ in GP’s office with a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI, 97.95–100 %) but a very low sensitivity of 32.56 % (95 % CI, 20.49–47.48 %). Significant agreement for forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured at GP’s office and at lung function lab was found (mean difference 0.01 L, p = 0.667) but not for other measured parameters (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results point out that active case finding in a population at risk for COPD should be instituted (almost 20 % of undiagnosed COPD). Based on our results lung function testing with COPD-6™ can substitute spirometry testing in cases where it is not readily available to the patient/physician taken into account that the traditional FEV(1)/FEV(6) cutoff value of <0.7 is not the only criterion for diagnosis and/or further referral. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01550679 Registered 28 September 2014, retrospectively registered |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4992327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49923272016-08-21 Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference Labor, Marina Vrbica, Žarko Gudelj, Ivan Labor, Slavica Plavec, Davor BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: COPD-6™ is a lung function testing device for a rapid pre-spirometry testing to screen-out at-risk individuals not having COPD and indicating those at risk. The aim of this study was to validate COPD-6™ lung function testing (index test) in general practice in discriminating patients with COPD out of the population at risk - smokers/ex-smokers with no previous diagnosis of COPD, using measurements at tertiary care as reference standard. METHODS: Consecutive 227 subjects (115 women, 185 smokers/42 ex-smokers, ≥20 pack-years) with no previous diagnosis of COPD, aged 52.5 (SD 6.8) years from 26 general practitioners (GPs) were recruited, lung function tested with COPD-6™, referred to the tertiary institution for repeated COPD-6™ testing followed by spirometry with a bronchodilator (salbutamol), examination, and pulmonologist consultation for the diagnosis and severity of COPD. RESULTS: COPD was diagnosed in 43 subjects (18.9 %), with an AUC of 0.827 (95 % CI 0.769-0.875, P < 0.001) for the diagnosis of COPD when lung function was measured using COPD-6™ in GP’s office with a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI, 97.95–100 %) but a very low sensitivity of 32.56 % (95 % CI, 20.49–47.48 %). Significant agreement for forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured at GP’s office and at lung function lab was found (mean difference 0.01 L, p = 0.667) but not for other measured parameters (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results point out that active case finding in a population at risk for COPD should be instituted (almost 20 % of undiagnosed COPD). Based on our results lung function testing with COPD-6™ can substitute spirometry testing in cases where it is not readily available to the patient/physician taken into account that the traditional FEV(1)/FEV(6) cutoff value of <0.7 is not the only criterion for diagnosis and/or further referral. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01550679 Registered 28 September 2014, retrospectively registered BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4992327/ /pubmed/27542843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0518-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Labor, Marina Vrbica, Žarko Gudelj, Ivan Labor, Slavica Plavec, Davor Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0518-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT labormarina diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference AT vrbicazarko diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference AT gudeljivan diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference AT laborslavica diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference AT plavecdavor diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference |