Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference

BACKGROUND: COPD-6™ is a lung function testing device for a rapid pre-spirometry testing to screen-out at-risk individuals not having COPD and indicating those at risk. The aim of this study was to validate COPD-6™ lung function testing (index test) in general practice in discriminating patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labor, Marina, Vrbica, Žarko, Gudelj, Ivan, Labor, Slavica, Plavec, Davor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0518-8
_version_ 1782449001179643904
author Labor, Marina
Vrbica, Žarko
Gudelj, Ivan
Labor, Slavica
Plavec, Davor
author_facet Labor, Marina
Vrbica, Žarko
Gudelj, Ivan
Labor, Slavica
Plavec, Davor
author_sort Labor, Marina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COPD-6™ is a lung function testing device for a rapid pre-spirometry testing to screen-out at-risk individuals not having COPD and indicating those at risk. The aim of this study was to validate COPD-6™ lung function testing (index test) in general practice in discriminating patients with COPD out of the population at risk - smokers/ex-smokers with no previous diagnosis of COPD, using measurements at tertiary care as reference standard. METHODS: Consecutive 227 subjects (115 women, 185 smokers/42 ex-smokers, ≥20 pack-years) with no previous diagnosis of COPD, aged 52.5 (SD 6.8) years from 26 general practitioners (GPs) were recruited, lung function tested with COPD-6™, referred to the tertiary institution for repeated COPD-6™ testing followed by spirometry with a bronchodilator (salbutamol), examination, and pulmonologist consultation for the diagnosis and severity of COPD. RESULTS: COPD was diagnosed in 43 subjects (18.9 %), with an AUC of 0.827 (95 % CI 0.769-0.875, P < 0.001) for the diagnosis of COPD when lung function was measured using COPD-6™ in GP’s office with a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI, 97.95–100 %) but a very low sensitivity of 32.56 % (95 % CI, 20.49–47.48 %). Significant agreement for forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured at GP’s office and at lung function lab was found (mean difference 0.01 L, p = 0.667) but not for other measured parameters (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results point out that active case finding in a population at risk for COPD should be instituted (almost 20 % of undiagnosed COPD). Based on our results lung function testing with COPD-6™ can substitute spirometry testing in cases where it is not readily available to the patient/physician taken into account that the traditional FEV(1)/FEV(6) cutoff value of <0.7 is not the only criterion for diagnosis and/or further referral. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01550679 Registered 28 September 2014, retrospectively registered
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49923272016-08-21 Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference Labor, Marina Vrbica, Žarko Gudelj, Ivan Labor, Slavica Plavec, Davor BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: COPD-6™ is a lung function testing device for a rapid pre-spirometry testing to screen-out at-risk individuals not having COPD and indicating those at risk. The aim of this study was to validate COPD-6™ lung function testing (index test) in general practice in discriminating patients with COPD out of the population at risk - smokers/ex-smokers with no previous diagnosis of COPD, using measurements at tertiary care as reference standard. METHODS: Consecutive 227 subjects (115 women, 185 smokers/42 ex-smokers, ≥20 pack-years) with no previous diagnosis of COPD, aged 52.5 (SD 6.8) years from 26 general practitioners (GPs) were recruited, lung function tested with COPD-6™, referred to the tertiary institution for repeated COPD-6™ testing followed by spirometry with a bronchodilator (salbutamol), examination, and pulmonologist consultation for the diagnosis and severity of COPD. RESULTS: COPD was diagnosed in 43 subjects (18.9 %), with an AUC of 0.827 (95 % CI 0.769-0.875, P < 0.001) for the diagnosis of COPD when lung function was measured using COPD-6™ in GP’s office with a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI, 97.95–100 %) but a very low sensitivity of 32.56 % (95 % CI, 20.49–47.48 %). Significant agreement for forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured at GP’s office and at lung function lab was found (mean difference 0.01 L, p = 0.667) but not for other measured parameters (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results point out that active case finding in a population at risk for COPD should be instituted (almost 20 % of undiagnosed COPD). Based on our results lung function testing with COPD-6™ can substitute spirometry testing in cases where it is not readily available to the patient/physician taken into account that the traditional FEV(1)/FEV(6) cutoff value of <0.7 is not the only criterion for diagnosis and/or further referral. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01550679 Registered 28 September 2014, retrospectively registered BioMed Central 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4992327/ /pubmed/27542843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0518-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Labor, Marina
Vrbica, Žarko
Gudelj, Ivan
Labor, Slavica
Plavec, Davor
Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
title Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0518-8
work_keys_str_mv AT labormarina diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference
AT vrbicazarko diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference
AT gudeljivan diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference
AT laborslavica diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference
AT plavecdavor diagnosticaccuracyofapocketscreeningspirometerindiagnosingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalvalidationstudyusingtertiarycareasareference