Cargando…

Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study

BACKGROUND: Activity monitoring is important to establish accurate daily physical activity levels in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, few studies address issues around inclusion or exclusion of step count data; in particular, how a valid day should be defined and what impact different len...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Nichola C., Mudge, Suzie, Stott, N. Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27544209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2218-9
_version_ 1782449030916210688
author Wilson, Nichola C.
Mudge, Suzie
Stott, N. Susan
author_facet Wilson, Nichola C.
Mudge, Suzie
Stott, N. Susan
author_sort Wilson, Nichola C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Activity monitoring is important to establish accurate daily physical activity levels in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, few studies address issues around inclusion or exclusion of step count data; in particular, how a valid day should be defined and what impact different lengths of monitoring have on retention of participant data within a study. This study assessed how different ‘valid day’ definitions influenced inclusion of participant data in final analyses and the subsequent variability of the data. RESULTS: Sixty-nine children with CP were fitted with a StepWatch™ Activity Monitor and instructed to wear it for a week. Data analysis used two broad definitions of a day, based on either number of steps in a 24 h monitoring period or the number of hours of recorded activity in a 24 h monitoring period. Eight children either did not use the monitor, or used it for only 1 day. The remaining 61 children provided 2 valid days of monitoring defined as >100 recorded steps per 24 h period and 55 (90 %) completed 2 valid days of monitoring with ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period. Performance variability in daily step count was lower across 2 days of monitoring when a valid day was defined as ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period (ICC = 0.765) and, higher when the definition >100 recorded steps per 24 h period (ICC = 0.62). Only 46 participants (75 %) completed 5 days of monitoring with >100 recorded steps per 24 h period and only 23 (38 %) achieved 5 days of monitoring with ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period. Datasets of participants who functioned at GMFCS level II were differentially excluded when the criteria for inclusion in final analysis was 5 valid days of ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period, leaving datasets available for only 8 of 32 participant datasets retained in the study. CONCLUSION: We conclude that changes in definition of a valid day have significant impacts on both inclusion of participant data in final analysis and measured variability of total step count.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49925682016-08-22 Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study Wilson, Nichola C. Mudge, Suzie Stott, N. Susan BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Activity monitoring is important to establish accurate daily physical activity levels in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, few studies address issues around inclusion or exclusion of step count data; in particular, how a valid day should be defined and what impact different lengths of monitoring have on retention of participant data within a study. This study assessed how different ‘valid day’ definitions influenced inclusion of participant data in final analyses and the subsequent variability of the data. RESULTS: Sixty-nine children with CP were fitted with a StepWatch™ Activity Monitor and instructed to wear it for a week. Data analysis used two broad definitions of a day, based on either number of steps in a 24 h monitoring period or the number of hours of recorded activity in a 24 h monitoring period. Eight children either did not use the monitor, or used it for only 1 day. The remaining 61 children provided 2 valid days of monitoring defined as >100 recorded steps per 24 h period and 55 (90 %) completed 2 valid days of monitoring with ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period. Performance variability in daily step count was lower across 2 days of monitoring when a valid day was defined as ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period (ICC = 0.765) and, higher when the definition >100 recorded steps per 24 h period (ICC = 0.62). Only 46 participants (75 %) completed 5 days of monitoring with >100 recorded steps per 24 h period and only 23 (38 %) achieved 5 days of monitoring with ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period. Datasets of participants who functioned at GMFCS level II were differentially excluded when the criteria for inclusion in final analysis was 5 valid days of ≥10 h recorded activity per 24 h period, leaving datasets available for only 8 of 32 participant datasets retained in the study. CONCLUSION: We conclude that changes in definition of a valid day have significant impacts on both inclusion of participant data in final analysis and measured variability of total step count. BioMed Central 2016-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4992568/ /pubmed/27544209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2218-9 Text en © Wilson et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson, Nichola C.
Mudge, Suzie
Stott, N. Susan
Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study
title Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study
title_full Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study
title_fullStr Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study
title_full_unstemmed Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study
title_short Variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study
title_sort variability of total step activity in children with cerebral palsy: influence of definition of a day on participant retention within the study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27544209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2218-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonnicholac variabilityoftotalstepactivityinchildrenwithcerebralpalsyinfluenceofdefinitionofadayonparticipantretentionwithinthestudy
AT mudgesuzie variabilityoftotalstepactivityinchildrenwithcerebralpalsyinfluenceofdefinitionofadayonparticipantretentionwithinthestudy
AT stottnsusan variabilityoftotalstepactivityinchildrenwithcerebralpalsyinfluenceofdefinitionofadayonparticipantretentionwithinthestudy