Cargando…

No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects

Prolonged exposure to images of narrow bodies has been shown to induce a perceptual aftereffect, such that observers’ point of subjective normality (PSN) for bodies shifts toward narrower bodies. The converse effect is shown for adaptation to wide bodies. In low-level stimuli, object attention (atte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephen, Ian D., Bickersteth, Chloe, Mond, Jonathan, Stevenson, Richard J., Brooks, Kevin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01223
_version_ 1782449039027994624
author Stephen, Ian D.
Bickersteth, Chloe
Mond, Jonathan
Stevenson, Richard J.
Brooks, Kevin R.
author_facet Stephen, Ian D.
Bickersteth, Chloe
Mond, Jonathan
Stevenson, Richard J.
Brooks, Kevin R.
author_sort Stephen, Ian D.
collection PubMed
description Prolonged exposure to images of narrow bodies has been shown to induce a perceptual aftereffect, such that observers’ point of subjective normality (PSN) for bodies shifts toward narrower bodies. The converse effect is shown for adaptation to wide bodies. In low-level stimuli, object attention (attention directed to the object) and spatial attention (attention directed to the location of the object) have been shown to increase the magnitude of visual aftereffects, while object-based attention enhances the adaptation effect in faces. It is not known whether featural attention (attention directed to a specific aspect of the object) affects the magnitude of adaptation effects in body stimuli. Here, we manipulate the attention of Caucasian observers to different featural information in body images, by asking them to rate the fatness or sex typicality of male and female bodies manipulated to appear fatter or thinner than average. PSNs for body fatness were taken at baseline and after adaptation, and a change in PSN (ΔPSN) was calculated. A body size adaptation effect was found, with observers who viewed fat bodies showing an increased PSN, and those exposed to thin bodies showing a reduced PSN. However, manipulations of featural attention to body fatness or sex typicality produced equivalent results, suggesting that featural attention may not affect the strength of the body size aftereffect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49927042016-09-05 No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects Stephen, Ian D. Bickersteth, Chloe Mond, Jonathan Stevenson, Richard J. Brooks, Kevin R. Front Psychol Psychology Prolonged exposure to images of narrow bodies has been shown to induce a perceptual aftereffect, such that observers’ point of subjective normality (PSN) for bodies shifts toward narrower bodies. The converse effect is shown for adaptation to wide bodies. In low-level stimuli, object attention (attention directed to the object) and spatial attention (attention directed to the location of the object) have been shown to increase the magnitude of visual aftereffects, while object-based attention enhances the adaptation effect in faces. It is not known whether featural attention (attention directed to a specific aspect of the object) affects the magnitude of adaptation effects in body stimuli. Here, we manipulate the attention of Caucasian observers to different featural information in body images, by asking them to rate the fatness or sex typicality of male and female bodies manipulated to appear fatter or thinner than average. PSNs for body fatness were taken at baseline and after adaptation, and a change in PSN (ΔPSN) was calculated. A body size adaptation effect was found, with observers who viewed fat bodies showing an increased PSN, and those exposed to thin bodies showing a reduced PSN. However, manipulations of featural attention to body fatness or sex typicality produced equivalent results, suggesting that featural attention may not affect the strength of the body size aftereffect. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4992704/ /pubmed/27597835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01223 Text en Copyright © 2016 Stephen, Bickersteth, Mond, Stevenson and Brooks. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Stephen, Ian D.
Bickersteth, Chloe
Mond, Jonathan
Stevenson, Richard J.
Brooks, Kevin R.
No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects
title No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects
title_full No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects
title_fullStr No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects
title_full_unstemmed No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects
title_short No Effect of Featural Attention on Body Size Aftereffects
title_sort no effect of featural attention on body size aftereffects
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01223
work_keys_str_mv AT stepheniand noeffectoffeaturalattentiononbodysizeaftereffects
AT bickerstethchloe noeffectoffeaturalattentiononbodysizeaftereffects
AT mondjonathan noeffectoffeaturalattentiononbodysizeaftereffects
AT stevensonrichardj noeffectoffeaturalattentiononbodysizeaftereffects
AT brookskevinr noeffectoffeaturalattentiononbodysizeaftereffects