Cargando…

Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation

The auditory evoked N1m-P2m response complex presents a challenging case for MEG source-modelling, because symmetrical, phase-locked activity occurs in the hemispheres both contralateral and ipsilateral to stimulation. Beamformer methods, in particular, can be susceptible to localisation bias and sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gascoyne, Lauren, Furlong, Paul L., Hillebrand, Arjan, Worthen, Siân F., Witton, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27545435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31052
_version_ 1782449066652729344
author Gascoyne, Lauren
Furlong, Paul L.
Hillebrand, Arjan
Worthen, Siân F.
Witton, Caroline
author_facet Gascoyne, Lauren
Furlong, Paul L.
Hillebrand, Arjan
Worthen, Siân F.
Witton, Caroline
author_sort Gascoyne, Lauren
collection PubMed
description The auditory evoked N1m-P2m response complex presents a challenging case for MEG source-modelling, because symmetrical, phase-locked activity occurs in the hemispheres both contralateral and ipsilateral to stimulation. Beamformer methods, in particular, can be susceptible to localisation bias and spurious sources under these conditions. This study explored the accuracy and efficiency of event-related beamformer source models for auditory MEG data under typical experimental conditions: monaural and diotic stimulation; and whole-head beamformer analysis compared to a half-head analysis using only sensors from the hemisphere contralateral to stimulation. Event-related beamformer localisations were also compared with more traditional single-dipole models. At the group level, the event-related beamformer performed equally well as the single-dipole models in terms of accuracy for both the N1m and the P2m, and in terms of efficiency (number of successful source models) for the N1m. The results yielded by the half-head analysis did not differ significantly from those produced by the traditional whole-head analysis. Any localisation bias caused by the presence of correlated sources is minimal in the context of the inter-individual variability in source localisations. In conclusion, event-related beamformers provide a useful alternative to equivalent-current dipole models in localisation of auditory evoked responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49928562016-08-30 Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation Gascoyne, Lauren Furlong, Paul L. Hillebrand, Arjan Worthen, Siân F. Witton, Caroline Sci Rep Article The auditory evoked N1m-P2m response complex presents a challenging case for MEG source-modelling, because symmetrical, phase-locked activity occurs in the hemispheres both contralateral and ipsilateral to stimulation. Beamformer methods, in particular, can be susceptible to localisation bias and spurious sources under these conditions. This study explored the accuracy and efficiency of event-related beamformer source models for auditory MEG data under typical experimental conditions: monaural and diotic stimulation; and whole-head beamformer analysis compared to a half-head analysis using only sensors from the hemisphere contralateral to stimulation. Event-related beamformer localisations were also compared with more traditional single-dipole models. At the group level, the event-related beamformer performed equally well as the single-dipole models in terms of accuracy for both the N1m and the P2m, and in terms of efficiency (number of successful source models) for the N1m. The results yielded by the half-head analysis did not differ significantly from those produced by the traditional whole-head analysis. Any localisation bias caused by the presence of correlated sources is minimal in the context of the inter-individual variability in source localisations. In conclusion, event-related beamformers provide a useful alternative to equivalent-current dipole models in localisation of auditory evoked responses. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4992856/ /pubmed/27545435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31052 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Gascoyne, Lauren
Furlong, Paul L.
Hillebrand, Arjan
Worthen, Siân F.
Witton, Caroline
Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation
title Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation
title_full Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation
title_fullStr Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation
title_short Localising the auditory N1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation
title_sort localising the auditory n1m with event-related beamformers: localisation accuracy following bilateral and unilateral stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27545435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31052
work_keys_str_mv AT gascoynelauren localisingtheauditoryn1mwitheventrelatedbeamformerslocalisationaccuracyfollowingbilateralandunilateralstimulation
AT furlongpaull localisingtheauditoryn1mwitheventrelatedbeamformerslocalisationaccuracyfollowingbilateralandunilateralstimulation
AT hillebrandarjan localisingtheauditoryn1mwitheventrelatedbeamformerslocalisationaccuracyfollowingbilateralandunilateralstimulation
AT worthensianf localisingtheauditoryn1mwitheventrelatedbeamformerslocalisationaccuracyfollowingbilateralandunilateralstimulation
AT wittoncaroline localisingtheauditoryn1mwitheventrelatedbeamformerslocalisationaccuracyfollowingbilateralandunilateralstimulation