Cargando…

Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an efficacious treatment for some types of cancers. However, PDT-induced tumor hypoxia as a result of oxygen consumption and vascular damage can reduce the efficacy of this therapy. Measuring and monitoring intrinsic and PDT-induced tumor hypoxia in vivo during PDT is o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong, Xiao, Srivatsan, Avinash, Jacobson, Orit, Wang, Yu, Wang, Zhantong, Yang, Xiangyu, Niu, Gang, Kiesewetter, Dale O., Zheng, Hairong, Chen, Xiaoyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27546160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31551
_version_ 1782449071255977984
author Tong, Xiao
Srivatsan, Avinash
Jacobson, Orit
Wang, Yu
Wang, Zhantong
Yang, Xiangyu
Niu, Gang
Kiesewetter, Dale O.
Zheng, Hairong
Chen, Xiaoyuan
author_facet Tong, Xiao
Srivatsan, Avinash
Jacobson, Orit
Wang, Yu
Wang, Zhantong
Yang, Xiangyu
Niu, Gang
Kiesewetter, Dale O.
Zheng, Hairong
Chen, Xiaoyuan
author_sort Tong, Xiao
collection PubMed
description Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an efficacious treatment for some types of cancers. However, PDT-induced tumor hypoxia as a result of oxygen consumption and vascular damage can reduce the efficacy of this therapy. Measuring and monitoring intrinsic and PDT-induced tumor hypoxia in vivo during PDT is of high interest for prognostic and treatment evaluation. In the present study, static and dynamic (18)F-FMISO PET were performed with mice bearing either U87MG or MDA-MB-435 tumor xenografts immediately before and after PDT at different time points. Significant difference in tumor hypoxia in response to PDT over time was found between the U87MG and MDA-MB-435 tumors in both static and dynamic PET. Dynamic PET with pharmacokinetics modeling further monitored the kinetics of (18)F-FMISO retention to hypoxic sites after treatment. The K(i) and k(3) parametric analysis provided information on tumor hypoxia by distinction of the specific tracer retention in hypoxic sites from its non-specific distribution in tumor. Dynamic (18)F-FMISO PET with pharmacokinetics modeling, complementary to static PET analysis, provides a potential imaging tool for more detailed and more accurate quantification of tumor hypoxia during PDT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4992876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49928762016-08-30 Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy Tong, Xiao Srivatsan, Avinash Jacobson, Orit Wang, Yu Wang, Zhantong Yang, Xiangyu Niu, Gang Kiesewetter, Dale O. Zheng, Hairong Chen, Xiaoyuan Sci Rep Article Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an efficacious treatment for some types of cancers. However, PDT-induced tumor hypoxia as a result of oxygen consumption and vascular damage can reduce the efficacy of this therapy. Measuring and monitoring intrinsic and PDT-induced tumor hypoxia in vivo during PDT is of high interest for prognostic and treatment evaluation. In the present study, static and dynamic (18)F-FMISO PET were performed with mice bearing either U87MG or MDA-MB-435 tumor xenografts immediately before and after PDT at different time points. Significant difference in tumor hypoxia in response to PDT over time was found between the U87MG and MDA-MB-435 tumors in both static and dynamic PET. Dynamic PET with pharmacokinetics modeling further monitored the kinetics of (18)F-FMISO retention to hypoxic sites after treatment. The K(i) and k(3) parametric analysis provided information on tumor hypoxia by distinction of the specific tracer retention in hypoxic sites from its non-specific distribution in tumor. Dynamic (18)F-FMISO PET with pharmacokinetics modeling, complementary to static PET analysis, provides a potential imaging tool for more detailed and more accurate quantification of tumor hypoxia during PDT. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4992876/ /pubmed/27546160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31551 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Tong, Xiao
Srivatsan, Avinash
Jacobson, Orit
Wang, Yu
Wang, Zhantong
Yang, Xiangyu
Niu, Gang
Kiesewetter, Dale O.
Zheng, Hairong
Chen, Xiaoyuan
Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy
title Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy
title_full Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy
title_fullStr Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy
title_short Monitoring Tumor Hypoxia Using (18)F-FMISO PET and Pharmacokinetics Modeling after Photodynamic Therapy
title_sort monitoring tumor hypoxia using (18)f-fmiso pet and pharmacokinetics modeling after photodynamic therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4992876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27546160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31551
work_keys_str_mv AT tongxiao monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT srivatsanavinash monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT jacobsonorit monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT wangyu monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT wangzhantong monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT yangxiangyu monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT niugang monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT kiesewetterdaleo monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT zhenghairong monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy
AT chenxiaoyuan monitoringtumorhypoxiausing18ffmisopetandpharmacokineticsmodelingafterphotodynamictherapy