Cargando…

Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients

BACKGROUND: Lung-protective ventilation strategy suggests the use of low tidal volume, depending on ideal body weight, and adequate levels of PEEP. However, reducing tidal volume according to ideal body weight does not always prevent overstress and overstrain. On the contrary, titrating mechanical v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiumello, Davide, Carlesso, Eleonora, Brioni, Matteo, Cressoni, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27545828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1446-7
_version_ 1782449095378468864
author Chiumello, Davide
Carlesso, Eleonora
Brioni, Matteo
Cressoni, Massimo
author_facet Chiumello, Davide
Carlesso, Eleonora
Brioni, Matteo
Cressoni, Massimo
author_sort Chiumello, Davide
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung-protective ventilation strategy suggests the use of low tidal volume, depending on ideal body weight, and adequate levels of PEEP. However, reducing tidal volume according to ideal body weight does not always prevent overstress and overstrain. On the contrary, titrating mechanical ventilation on airway driving pressure, computed as airway pressure changes from PEEP to end-inspiratory plateau pressure, equivalent to the ratio between the tidal volume and compliance of respiratory system, should better reflect lung injury. However, possible changes in chest wall elastance could affect the reliability of airway driving pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate if airway driving pressure could accurately predict lung stress (the pressure generated into the lung due to PEEP and tidal volume). METHODS: One hundred and fifty ARDS patients were enrolled. At 5 and 15 cmH(2)O of PEEP, lung stress, driving pressure, lung and chest wall elastance were measured. RESULTS: The applied tidal volume (mL/kg of ideal body weight) was not related to lung gas volume (r(2) = 0.0005 p = 0.772). Patients were divided according to an airway driving pressure lower and equal/higher than 15 cmH(2)O (the lower and higher airway driving pressure groups). At both PEEP levels, the higher airway driving pressure group had a significantly higher lung stress, respiratory system and lung elastance compared to the lower airway driving pressure group. Airway driving pressure was significantly related to lung stress (r(2) = 0.581 p < 0.0001 and r(2) = 0.353 p < 0.0001 at 5 and 15 cmH(2)O of PEEP). For a lung stress of 24 and 26 cmH(2)O, the optimal cutoff value for the airway driving pressure were 15.0 cmH(2)O (ROC AUC 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.782–0.922); and 16.7 (ROC AUC 0.84, 95 % CI = 0.742–0.936). CONCLUSIONS: Airway driving pressure can detect lung overstress with an acceptable accuracy. However, further studies are needed to establish if these limits could be used for ventilator settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1446-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49930082016-08-23 Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients Chiumello, Davide Carlesso, Eleonora Brioni, Matteo Cressoni, Massimo Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Lung-protective ventilation strategy suggests the use of low tidal volume, depending on ideal body weight, and adequate levels of PEEP. However, reducing tidal volume according to ideal body weight does not always prevent overstress and overstrain. On the contrary, titrating mechanical ventilation on airway driving pressure, computed as airway pressure changes from PEEP to end-inspiratory plateau pressure, equivalent to the ratio between the tidal volume and compliance of respiratory system, should better reflect lung injury. However, possible changes in chest wall elastance could affect the reliability of airway driving pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate if airway driving pressure could accurately predict lung stress (the pressure generated into the lung due to PEEP and tidal volume). METHODS: One hundred and fifty ARDS patients were enrolled. At 5 and 15 cmH(2)O of PEEP, lung stress, driving pressure, lung and chest wall elastance were measured. RESULTS: The applied tidal volume (mL/kg of ideal body weight) was not related to lung gas volume (r(2) = 0.0005 p = 0.772). Patients were divided according to an airway driving pressure lower and equal/higher than 15 cmH(2)O (the lower and higher airway driving pressure groups). At both PEEP levels, the higher airway driving pressure group had a significantly higher lung stress, respiratory system and lung elastance compared to the lower airway driving pressure group. Airway driving pressure was significantly related to lung stress (r(2) = 0.581 p < 0.0001 and r(2) = 0.353 p < 0.0001 at 5 and 15 cmH(2)O of PEEP). For a lung stress of 24 and 26 cmH(2)O, the optimal cutoff value for the airway driving pressure were 15.0 cmH(2)O (ROC AUC 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.782–0.922); and 16.7 (ROC AUC 0.84, 95 % CI = 0.742–0.936). CONCLUSIONS: Airway driving pressure can detect lung overstress with an acceptable accuracy. However, further studies are needed to establish if these limits could be used for ventilator settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1446-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4993008/ /pubmed/27545828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1446-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chiumello, Davide
Carlesso, Eleonora
Brioni, Matteo
Cressoni, Massimo
Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients
title Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients
title_full Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients
title_fullStr Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients
title_full_unstemmed Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients
title_short Airway driving pressure and lung stress in ARDS patients
title_sort airway driving pressure and lung stress in ards patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27545828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1446-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chiumellodavide airwaydrivingpressureandlungstressinardspatients
AT carlessoeleonora airwaydrivingpressureandlungstressinardspatients
AT brionimatteo airwaydrivingpressureandlungstressinardspatients
AT cressonimassimo airwaydrivingpressureandlungstressinardspatients