Cargando…
A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction
The objective of this study was to compare the 2 leading human acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction with implants. This retrospective study draws on the experience of 2 expert surgeons with a history of long-standing use of the Alloderm-RTU (LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ) produc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Science Company, LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27602176 |
_version_ | 1782449098869178368 |
---|---|
author | Zenn, Michael R. Salzberg, C. Andrew |
author_facet | Zenn, Michael R. Salzberg, C. Andrew |
author_sort | Zenn, Michael R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to compare the 2 leading human acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction with implants. This retrospective study draws on the experience of 2 expert surgeons with a history of long-standing use of the Alloderm-RTU (LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ) product who switched to the DermACELL acellular dermal matrix (LifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, Va) product. The consecutive nature of these data over this change allowed comparison between the 2 products without the confounding effects of patient selection or change in technique. The postoperative complications of seroma, infection, implant loss, and unplanned return to the operating room were studied, and no statistical differences were noted between these 2 products. The overall complications rates were low, with implant loss and infection less than 2% in 249 cases. Recommendations are for continued use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction and product selection based on price and availability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4993036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Open Science Company, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49930362016-09-06 A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction Zenn, Michael R. Salzberg, C. Andrew Eplasty Journal Article The objective of this study was to compare the 2 leading human acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction with implants. This retrospective study draws on the experience of 2 expert surgeons with a history of long-standing use of the Alloderm-RTU (LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ) product who switched to the DermACELL acellular dermal matrix (LifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, Va) product. The consecutive nature of these data over this change allowed comparison between the 2 products without the confounding effects of patient selection or change in technique. The postoperative complications of seroma, infection, implant loss, and unplanned return to the operating room were studied, and no statistical differences were noted between these 2 products. The overall complications rates were low, with implant loss and infection less than 2% in 249 cases. Recommendations are for continued use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction and product selection based on price and availability. Open Science Company, LLC 2016-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4993036/ /pubmed/27602176 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Journal Article Zenn, Michael R. Salzberg, C. Andrew A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction |
title | A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction |
title_full | A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction |
title_short | A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction |
title_sort | direct comparison of alloderm-ready to use (rtu) and dermacell in immediate breast implant reconstruction |
topic | Journal Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27602176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zennmichaelr adirectcomparisonofallodermreadytousertuanddermacellinimmediatebreastimplantreconstruction AT salzbergcandrew adirectcomparisonofallodermreadytousertuanddermacellinimmediatebreastimplantreconstruction AT zennmichaelr directcomparisonofallodermreadytousertuanddermacellinimmediatebreastimplantreconstruction AT salzbergcandrew directcomparisonofallodermreadytousertuanddermacellinimmediatebreastimplantreconstruction |