Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion

BACKGROUND: This study was done to evaluate remineralizing potential of bioactive glasses (BAGs) and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide (ACP-CPP) on early enamel lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were sectioned sagittally. The buccal half was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palaniswamy, Udaya Kumar, Prashar, Neha, Kaushik, Mamta, Lakkam, Surender Ram, Arya, Shikha, Pebbeti, Swetha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605985
_version_ 1782449099314823168
author Palaniswamy, Udaya Kumar
Prashar, Neha
Kaushik, Mamta
Lakkam, Surender Ram
Arya, Shikha
Pebbeti, Swetha
author_facet Palaniswamy, Udaya Kumar
Prashar, Neha
Kaushik, Mamta
Lakkam, Surender Ram
Arya, Shikha
Pebbeti, Swetha
author_sort Palaniswamy, Udaya Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was done to evaluate remineralizing potential of bioactive glasses (BAGs) and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide (ACP-CPP) on early enamel lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were sectioned sagittally. The buccal half was impregnated in acrylic resin blocks and treated with 37% phosphoric acid in liquid form, to demineralize enamel surface to simulate early enamel lesion. The samples were divided into two groups. The samples in Group I were treated with ACP-CPP (GC Tooth Mousse) and in Group II with BAG (Sensodyne Repair and Protect) and stored in saliva to prevent dehydration. The samples were tested for microhardness. The data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA post hoc multiple comparison and independent sample t- test and presented as a mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: All the samples showed a decrease in the microhardness after demineralization. After application of remineralizing agents, Group II showed a highly significant increase in the microhardness (P < 0.05) after 10 days, while Group I showed a significant increase in microhardness after 15 days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both the remineralizing agents tested in this study can be considered effective in repair and prevention of demineralization. BAG showed better results initially, but eventually both have similar remineralizing potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49930552016-09-07 A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion Palaniswamy, Udaya Kumar Prashar, Neha Kaushik, Mamta Lakkam, Surender Ram Arya, Shikha Pebbeti, Swetha Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was done to evaluate remineralizing potential of bioactive glasses (BAGs) and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide (ACP-CPP) on early enamel lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were sectioned sagittally. The buccal half was impregnated in acrylic resin blocks and treated with 37% phosphoric acid in liquid form, to demineralize enamel surface to simulate early enamel lesion. The samples were divided into two groups. The samples in Group I were treated with ACP-CPP (GC Tooth Mousse) and in Group II with BAG (Sensodyne Repair and Protect) and stored in saliva to prevent dehydration. The samples were tested for microhardness. The data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA post hoc multiple comparison and independent sample t- test and presented as a mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: All the samples showed a decrease in the microhardness after demineralization. After application of remineralizing agents, Group II showed a highly significant increase in the microhardness (P < 0.05) after 10 days, while Group I showed a significant increase in microhardness after 15 days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both the remineralizing agents tested in this study can be considered effective in repair and prevention of demineralization. BAG showed better results initially, but eventually both have similar remineralizing potential. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4993055/ /pubmed/27605985 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Palaniswamy, Udaya Kumar
Prashar, Neha
Kaushik, Mamta
Lakkam, Surender Ram
Arya, Shikha
Pebbeti, Swetha
A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion
title A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion
title_full A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion
title_short A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion
title_sort comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605985
work_keys_str_mv AT palaniswamyudayakumar acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT prasharneha acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT kaushikmamta acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT lakkamsurenderram acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT aryashikha acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT pebbetiswetha acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT palaniswamyudayakumar comparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT prasharneha comparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT kaushikmamta comparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT lakkamsurenderram comparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT aryashikha comparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion
AT pebbetiswetha comparativeevaluationofremineralizingabilityofbioactiveglassandamorphouscalciumphosphatecaseinphosphopeptideonearlyenamellesion