Cargando…

The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test

The self-paced maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) test (SPV), which is based on the Borg 6-20 Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, allows participants to self-regulate their exercise intensity during a closed-loop incremental maximal exercise test. As previous research has assessed the utility o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, W, Lambrick, D, Mauger, AR, Woolley, B, Faulkner, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601782
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1208478
_version_ 1782449115383201792
author Lim, W
Lambrick, D
Mauger, AR
Woolley, B
Faulkner, J
author_facet Lim, W
Lambrick, D
Mauger, AR
Woolley, B
Faulkner, J
author_sort Lim, W
collection PubMed
description The self-paced maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) test (SPV), which is based on the Borg 6-20 Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, allows participants to self-regulate their exercise intensity during a closed-loop incremental maximal exercise test. As previous research has assessed the utility of the SPV test within laboratory conditions, the purpose to this study was to assess the effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based, SPV test. In a cross-sectional study, fifteen men completed one laboratory-based graded exercise test (GXT) and three field-based SPV tests. The GXT was continuous and incremental until the attainment of VO(2)max. The SPV, which was completed on an outdoor 400m athletic track, consisted of five x 2 min perceptually-regulated (RPE11, 13, 15, 17 and 20) stages of incremental exercise. There were no differences in the VO(2)max reported between the GXT (63.5±10.1 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) and each SPV test (65.5±8.7, 65.4±7.0 and 66.7±7.7 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) for SPV1, SPV2 and SPV3, respectively; P>.05). Similar findings were observed when comparing VO(2)max between SPV tests (P>.05). High intraclass correlation coefficients were reported between the GXT and the SPV, and between each SPV test (≥.80). Although participants ran faster and further during SPV3, a similar pacing strategy was implemented during all tests. This study demonstrated that a field-based SPV is a valid and reliable VO(2)max test. As trial familiarisation did not moderate VO(2)max values from the SPV, the application of a single SPV test is an appropriate stand-alone protocol for gauging VO(2)max.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49931432016-09-07 The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test Lim, W Lambrick, D Mauger, AR Woolley, B Faulkner, J Biol Sport Original Paper The self-paced maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) test (SPV), which is based on the Borg 6-20 Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, allows participants to self-regulate their exercise intensity during a closed-loop incremental maximal exercise test. As previous research has assessed the utility of the SPV test within laboratory conditions, the purpose to this study was to assess the effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based, SPV test. In a cross-sectional study, fifteen men completed one laboratory-based graded exercise test (GXT) and three field-based SPV tests. The GXT was continuous and incremental until the attainment of VO(2)max. The SPV, which was completed on an outdoor 400m athletic track, consisted of five x 2 min perceptually-regulated (RPE11, 13, 15, 17 and 20) stages of incremental exercise. There were no differences in the VO(2)max reported between the GXT (63.5±10.1 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) and each SPV test (65.5±8.7, 65.4±7.0 and 66.7±7.7 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) for SPV1, SPV2 and SPV3, respectively; P>.05). Similar findings were observed when comparing VO(2)max between SPV tests (P>.05). High intraclass correlation coefficients were reported between the GXT and the SPV, and between each SPV test (≥.80). Although participants ran faster and further during SPV3, a similar pacing strategy was implemented during all tests. This study demonstrated that a field-based SPV is a valid and reliable VO(2)max test. As trial familiarisation did not moderate VO(2)max values from the SPV, the application of a single SPV test is an appropriate stand-alone protocol for gauging VO(2)max. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2016-07-02 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4993143/ /pubmed/27601782 http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1208478 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lim, W
Lambrick, D
Mauger, AR
Woolley, B
Faulkner, J
The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test
title The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test
title_full The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test
title_fullStr The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test
title_full_unstemmed The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test
title_short The effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced VO(2)max test
title_sort effect of trial familiarisation on the validity and reproducibility of a field-based self-paced vo(2)max test
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601782
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1208478
work_keys_str_mv AT limw theeffectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT lambrickd theeffectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT maugerar theeffectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT woolleyb theeffectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT faulknerj theeffectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT limw effectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT lambrickd effectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT maugerar effectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT woolleyb effectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest
AT faulknerj effectoftrialfamiliarisationonthevalidityandreproducibilityofafieldbasedselfpacedvo2maxtest