Cargando…

Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Ping, Pu, Lijin, Yang, Liuqing, Li, Fang, Luo, Zhiling, Guo, Tao, Hua, Baotong, Li, Shumin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518153
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.897333
_version_ 1782449123103866880
author Yang, Ping
Pu, Lijin
Yang, Liuqing
Li, Fang
Luo, Zhiling
Guo, Tao
Hua, Baotong
Li, Shumin
author_facet Yang, Ping
Pu, Lijin
Yang, Liuqing
Li, Fang
Luo, Zhiling
Guo, Tao
Hua, Baotong
Li, Shumin
author_sort Yang, Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were selected. These patients discontinued antiarrhythmic medication with no AF recurrence for more than 3 months after RFCA, and underwent ILR placement by a conventional method. The clinical manifestations and information on arrhythmias recorded by the ILR were followed up to assess the efficacy of AF RFCA. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 24.7±12.5 months. Of 32 patients with ILR information, 27 had successful RFCA and 5 had recurrent AF. The follow-up results obtained by traditional methods showed 29 patients with successful RFCA and 3 with recurrent AF (P<0.05). Among the 18 patients with clinical symptoms, 13 had recorded cardiac arrhythmic events (72.2%) and 5 showed sinus rhythm (27.8%). The ILRs recorded 18 patients with arrhythmic events (56.3%), including 12 cases of atrial arrhythmias, among whom 5 recurred at 9, 12, 16, 17, and 32 months after AF RFCA; there were also 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 4 with bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: The value of ILR in assessing the efficacy of AF RFCA was superior to that of traditional methods. ILR can promptly detect asymptomatic AF, and can monitor electrocardiogram features after RFCA, thus providing objective evidence of efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49932162016-09-02 Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Yang, Ping Pu, Lijin Yang, Liuqing Li, Fang Luo, Zhiling Guo, Tao Hua, Baotong Li, Shumin Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were selected. These patients discontinued antiarrhythmic medication with no AF recurrence for more than 3 months after RFCA, and underwent ILR placement by a conventional method. The clinical manifestations and information on arrhythmias recorded by the ILR were followed up to assess the efficacy of AF RFCA. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 24.7±12.5 months. Of 32 patients with ILR information, 27 had successful RFCA and 5 had recurrent AF. The follow-up results obtained by traditional methods showed 29 patients with successful RFCA and 3 with recurrent AF (P<0.05). Among the 18 patients with clinical symptoms, 13 had recorded cardiac arrhythmic events (72.2%) and 5 showed sinus rhythm (27.8%). The ILRs recorded 18 patients with arrhythmic events (56.3%), including 12 cases of atrial arrhythmias, among whom 5 recurred at 9, 12, 16, 17, and 32 months after AF RFCA; there were also 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 4 with bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: The value of ILR in assessing the efficacy of AF RFCA was superior to that of traditional methods. ILR can promptly detect asymptomatic AF, and can monitor electrocardiogram features after RFCA, thus providing objective evidence of efficacy. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4993216/ /pubmed/27518153 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.897333 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Yang, Ping
Pu, Lijin
Yang, Liuqing
Li, Fang
Luo, Zhiling
Guo, Tao
Hua, Baotong
Li, Shumin
Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
title Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort value of implantable loop recorders in monitoring efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518153
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.897333
work_keys_str_mv AT yangping valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation
AT pulijin valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation
AT yangliuqing valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation
AT lifang valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation
AT luozhiling valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation
AT guotao valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation
AT huabaotong valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation
AT lishumin valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation