Cargando…
Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518153 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.897333 |
_version_ | 1782449123103866880 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Ping Pu, Lijin Yang, Liuqing Li, Fang Luo, Zhiling Guo, Tao Hua, Baotong Li, Shumin |
author_facet | Yang, Ping Pu, Lijin Yang, Liuqing Li, Fang Luo, Zhiling Guo, Tao Hua, Baotong Li, Shumin |
author_sort | Yang, Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were selected. These patients discontinued antiarrhythmic medication with no AF recurrence for more than 3 months after RFCA, and underwent ILR placement by a conventional method. The clinical manifestations and information on arrhythmias recorded by the ILR were followed up to assess the efficacy of AF RFCA. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 24.7±12.5 months. Of 32 patients with ILR information, 27 had successful RFCA and 5 had recurrent AF. The follow-up results obtained by traditional methods showed 29 patients with successful RFCA and 3 with recurrent AF (P<0.05). Among the 18 patients with clinical symptoms, 13 had recorded cardiac arrhythmic events (72.2%) and 5 showed sinus rhythm (27.8%). The ILRs recorded 18 patients with arrhythmic events (56.3%), including 12 cases of atrial arrhythmias, among whom 5 recurred at 9, 12, 16, 17, and 32 months after AF RFCA; there were also 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 4 with bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: The value of ILR in assessing the efficacy of AF RFCA was superior to that of traditional methods. ILR can promptly detect asymptomatic AF, and can monitor electrocardiogram features after RFCA, thus providing objective evidence of efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4993216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49932162016-09-02 Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Yang, Ping Pu, Lijin Yang, Liuqing Li, Fang Luo, Zhiling Guo, Tao Hua, Baotong Li, Shumin Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were selected. These patients discontinued antiarrhythmic medication with no AF recurrence for more than 3 months after RFCA, and underwent ILR placement by a conventional method. The clinical manifestations and information on arrhythmias recorded by the ILR were followed up to assess the efficacy of AF RFCA. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 24.7±12.5 months. Of 32 patients with ILR information, 27 had successful RFCA and 5 had recurrent AF. The follow-up results obtained by traditional methods showed 29 patients with successful RFCA and 3 with recurrent AF (P<0.05). Among the 18 patients with clinical symptoms, 13 had recorded cardiac arrhythmic events (72.2%) and 5 showed sinus rhythm (27.8%). The ILRs recorded 18 patients with arrhythmic events (56.3%), including 12 cases of atrial arrhythmias, among whom 5 recurred at 9, 12, 16, 17, and 32 months after AF RFCA; there were also 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 4 with bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: The value of ILR in assessing the efficacy of AF RFCA was superior to that of traditional methods. ILR can promptly detect asymptomatic AF, and can monitor electrocardiogram features after RFCA, thus providing objective evidence of efficacy. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4993216/ /pubmed/27518153 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.897333 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Yang, Ping Pu, Lijin Yang, Liuqing Li, Fang Luo, Zhiling Guo, Tao Hua, Baotong Li, Shumin Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation |
title | Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full | Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation |
title_short | Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation |
title_sort | value of implantable loop recorders in monitoring efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518153 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.897333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangping valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation AT pulijin valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation AT yangliuqing valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation AT lifang valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation AT luozhiling valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation AT guotao valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation AT huabaotong valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation AT lishumin valueofimplantablelooprecordersinmonitoringefficacyofradiofrequencycatheterablationinatrialfibrillation |