Cargando…

Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom

BACKGROUND: Different methods of image quality evaluation are routinely used for analogue and digital mammography systems in Poland. In the present study, image quality for several screen-film (SF), computed radiography (CR), and fully digital (DR) mammography systems was compared directly with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta, Skrzyński, Witold, Fabiszewska, Ewa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27617048
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.897304
_version_ 1782449123323019264
author Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta
Skrzyński, Witold
Fabiszewska, Ewa
author_facet Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta
Skrzyński, Witold
Fabiszewska, Ewa
author_sort Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different methods of image quality evaluation are routinely used for analogue and digital mammography systems in Poland. In the present study, image quality for several screen-film (SF), computed radiography (CR), and fully digital (DR) mammography systems was compared directly with the use of the ACR mammography accreditation phantom. MATERIAL/METHODS: Image quality and mean glandular doses were measured and compared for 47 mammography systems in the Mazovia Voivodeship in Poland, including 26 SF systems, 12 CR systems, and 9 DR systems. The mean glandular dose for the breast simulated by 4.5 cm of PMMA was calculated with methods described in the “European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis”. Visibility of the structures in the image (fibers, microcalcifications, and masses) was evaluated with the mammographic accreditation ACR phantom. RESULTS: Image quality for DR systems was significantly higher than for SF and CR systems. Several SF systems failed to pass the image quality tests because of artifacts. The doses were within acceptable limits for all of the systems, but the doses for the CR systems were significantly higher than for the SF and DR systems. CONCLUSIONS: The best image quality, at a reasonably low dose, was observed for the DR systems. The CR systems are capable of obtaining the same image quality as the SF systems, but only at a significantly higher dose. The ACR phantom can be routinely used to evaluate image quality for all types of mammographic systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49932172016-09-09 Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta Skrzyński, Witold Fabiszewska, Ewa Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Different methods of image quality evaluation are routinely used for analogue and digital mammography systems in Poland. In the present study, image quality for several screen-film (SF), computed radiography (CR), and fully digital (DR) mammography systems was compared directly with the use of the ACR mammography accreditation phantom. MATERIAL/METHODS: Image quality and mean glandular doses were measured and compared for 47 mammography systems in the Mazovia Voivodeship in Poland, including 26 SF systems, 12 CR systems, and 9 DR systems. The mean glandular dose for the breast simulated by 4.5 cm of PMMA was calculated with methods described in the “European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis”. Visibility of the structures in the image (fibers, microcalcifications, and masses) was evaluated with the mammographic accreditation ACR phantom. RESULTS: Image quality for DR systems was significantly higher than for SF and CR systems. Several SF systems failed to pass the image quality tests because of artifacts. The doses were within acceptable limits for all of the systems, but the doses for the CR systems were significantly higher than for the SF and DR systems. CONCLUSIONS: The best image quality, at a reasonably low dose, was observed for the DR systems. The CR systems are capable of obtaining the same image quality as the SF systems, but only at a significantly higher dose. The ACR phantom can be routinely used to evaluate image quality for all types of mammographic systems. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4993217/ /pubmed/27617048 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.897304 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2016 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, Wioletta
Skrzyński, Witold
Fabiszewska, Ewa
Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom
title Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom
title_full Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom
title_fullStr Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom
title_short Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors – Application of the ACR Phantom
title_sort evaluation of doses and image quality in mammography with screen-film, cr, and dr detectors – application of the acr phantom
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27617048
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.897304
work_keys_str_mv AT slusarczykkacprzykwioletta evaluationofdosesandimagequalityinmammographywithscreenfilmcranddrdetectorsapplicationoftheacrphantom
AT skrzynskiwitold evaluationofdosesandimagequalityinmammographywithscreenfilmcranddrdetectorsapplicationoftheacrphantom
AT fabiszewskaewa evaluationofdosesandimagequalityinmammographywithscreenfilmcranddrdetectorsapplicationoftheacrphantom