Cargando…

Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®)

Poor inhaler technique hampers the efficacy of drug therapy in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Not only does this affect individual patient care, but it also impacts on the wider health care economics associated with these conditions. Treatment guidelines recommend a systematic app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dekhuijzen, Pieter Nicolaas Richard, Lavorini, Federico, Usmani, Omar S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S82857
_version_ 1782449144663638016
author Dekhuijzen, Pieter Nicolaas Richard
Lavorini, Federico
Usmani, Omar S
author_facet Dekhuijzen, Pieter Nicolaas Richard
Lavorini, Federico
Usmani, Omar S
author_sort Dekhuijzen, Pieter Nicolaas Richard
collection PubMed
description Poor inhaler technique hampers the efficacy of drug therapy in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Not only does this affect individual patient care, but it also impacts on the wider health care economics associated with these conditions. Treatment guidelines recommend a systematic approach to drug class selection; however, standardization of inhaler selection is currently difficult owing to the complexity of the interaction between the inhaler device and the patient. Specifically, individual patient preference can influence how successful a treatment is overall. This article reviews inhaler devices from the patient perspective, with a particular focus on the dry powder inhaler HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ Inhaler. It discusses factors that influence device preference and treatment compliance and reviews tools that can aid health care professionals to better match inhaler devices to individual patients’ needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49933942016-08-29 Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®) Dekhuijzen, Pieter Nicolaas Richard Lavorini, Federico Usmani, Omar S Patient Prefer Adherence Review Poor inhaler technique hampers the efficacy of drug therapy in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Not only does this affect individual patient care, but it also impacts on the wider health care economics associated with these conditions. Treatment guidelines recommend a systematic approach to drug class selection; however, standardization of inhaler selection is currently difficult owing to the complexity of the interaction between the inhaler device and the patient. Specifically, individual patient preference can influence how successful a treatment is overall. This article reviews inhaler devices from the patient perspective, with a particular focus on the dry powder inhaler HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ Inhaler. It discusses factors that influence device preference and treatment compliance and reviews tools that can aid health care professionals to better match inhaler devices to individual patients’ needs. Dove Medical Press 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4993394/ /pubmed/27574405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S82857 Text en © 2016 Dekhuijzen et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Dekhuijzen, Pieter Nicolaas Richard
Lavorini, Federico
Usmani, Omar S
Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®)
title Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®)
title_full Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®)
title_fullStr Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®)
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®)
title_short Patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for Respimat(®) or HandiHaler(®)
title_sort patients’ perspectives and preferences in the choice of inhalers: the case for respimat(®) or handihaler(®)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S82857
work_keys_str_mv AT dekhuijzenpieternicolaasrichard patientsperspectivesandpreferencesinthechoiceofinhalersthecaseforrespimatorhandihaler
AT lavorinifederico patientsperspectivesandpreferencesinthechoiceofinhalersthecaseforrespimatorhandihaler
AT usmaniomars patientsperspectivesandpreferencesinthechoiceofinhalersthecaseforrespimatorhandihaler