Cargando…
Exploring Differences in Dogs’ and Wolves’ Preference for Risk in a Foraging Task
Both human and non-humans species face decisions in their daily lives which may entail taking risks. At the individual level, a propensity for risk-taking has been shown to be positively correlated with explorative tendencies, whereas, at the species level a more variable and less stable feeding eco...
Autores principales: | Marshall-Pescini, Sarah, Besserdich, Ingo, Kratz, Corinna, Range, Friederike |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27602005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01241 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans
por: Range, Friederike, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
por: Dale, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Differences in persistence between dogs and wolves in an unsolvable task in the absence of humans
por: Rao, Akshay, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Food preferences of similarly raised and kept captive dogs and wolves
por: Rao, Akshay, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A task-experienced partner does not help dogs be as successful as wolves in a cooperative string-pulling task
por: Marshall-Pescini, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2018)