Cargando…

A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Ho-Yong, Huh, Yoon-Hyuk, Park, Chan-Jin, Cho, Lee-Ra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555900
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.304
_version_ 1782449205195833344
author Song, Ho-Yong
Huh, Yoon-Hyuk
Park, Chan-Jin
Cho, Lee-Ra
author_facet Song, Ho-Yong
Huh, Yoon-Hyuk
Park, Chan-Jin
Cho, Lee-Ra
author_sort Song, Ho-Yong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and wide platform (WP). The maxillary first molars were restored with one implant or two short implants. Three 2SI models (NP-oblique, NP-vertical, and NP-horizontal) and four single implant models (RP and WP in a centered or cantilevered position) were used. Axial and oblique loadings were applied on the occlusal surface of the crown. The von Mises stress values were measured at the bone-implant, peri-implant bone, and implant/abutment complex. RESULTS: The highest stress distribution at the bone-implant interface and the peri-implant bone was noticed in the RP group, and the lowest stress distribution was observed in the 2SI groups. Cantilevered position showed unfavorable stress distribution with axial loading. 2SI types did not affect the stress distribution in oblique loading. The number and installation positions of the implant, rather than the bone level, influenced the stress distribution of 2SIs. The implant/abutment complex of WP presented the highest stress concentration while that of 2SIs showed the lowest stress concentration. CONCLUSION: 2SIs may be useful for achieving stable stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant-abutment complex in the atrophic posterior maxilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49938442016-08-23 A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis Song, Ho-Yong Huh, Yoon-Hyuk Park, Chan-Jin Cho, Lee-Ra J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and wide platform (WP). The maxillary first molars were restored with one implant or two short implants. Three 2SI models (NP-oblique, NP-vertical, and NP-horizontal) and four single implant models (RP and WP in a centered or cantilevered position) were used. Axial and oblique loadings were applied on the occlusal surface of the crown. The von Mises stress values were measured at the bone-implant, peri-implant bone, and implant/abutment complex. RESULTS: The highest stress distribution at the bone-implant interface and the peri-implant bone was noticed in the RP group, and the lowest stress distribution was observed in the 2SI groups. Cantilevered position showed unfavorable stress distribution with axial loading. 2SI types did not affect the stress distribution in oblique loading. The number and installation positions of the implant, rather than the bone level, influenced the stress distribution of 2SIs. The implant/abutment complex of WP presented the highest stress concentration while that of 2SIs showed the lowest stress concentration. CONCLUSION: 2SIs may be useful for achieving stable stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant-abutment complex in the atrophic posterior maxilla. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016-08 2016-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4993844/ /pubmed/27555900 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.304 Text en © 2016 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Ho-Yong
Huh, Yoon-Hyuk
Park, Chan-Jin
Cho, Lee-Ra
A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis
title A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis
title_full A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis
title_fullStr A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis
title_short A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis
title_sort two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555900
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.304
work_keys_str_mv AT songhoyong atwoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis
AT huhyoonhyuk atwoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis
AT parkchanjin atwoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis
AT choleera atwoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis
AT songhoyong twoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis
AT huhyoonhyuk twoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis
AT parkchanjin twoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis
AT choleera twoshortimplantsupportedmolarrestorationinatrophicposteriormaxillaafiniteelementanalysis