Cargando…
Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108188 |
_version_ | 1782449213444980736 |
---|---|
author | Mounzer, Rawad Yen, Roy Marshall, Carrie Sams, Sharon Mehrotra, Sanjana Said, Mohamed Sherif Obuch, Joshua C. Brauer, Brian Attwell, Augustin Fukami, Norio Shah, Raj Amateau, Stuart Hall, Matthew Hosford, Lindsay Wilson, Robert Rastogi, Amit Wani, Sachin |
author_facet | Mounzer, Rawad Yen, Roy Marshall, Carrie Sams, Sharon Mehrotra, Sanjana Said, Mohamed Sherif Obuch, Joshua C. Brauer, Brian Attwell, Augustin Fukami, Norio Shah, Raj Amateau, Stuart Hall, Matthew Hosford, Lindsay Wilson, Robert Rastogi, Amit Wani, Sachin |
author_sort | Mounzer, Rawad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed to evaluate IOA among cytopathologists in assessing EUS-FNA cytology specimens of solid pancreatic lesions using a novel standardized scoring system and to assess individual clinical and cytologic predictors of IOA. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary care referral center were included. EUS-FNA slides were evaluated by four blinded cytopathologists using a standardized scoring system that assessed final cytologic diagnosis and quantitative (number of nucleated/diagnostic cells) and qualitative (bloodiness, inflammation/necrosis, contamination, artifact) cytologic parameters. Final clinical diagnosis was based on final cytology, surgical pathology, or 1-year clinical follow-up. IOA was calculated using multi-rater kappa (κ) statistics. Bivariate analyses were performed comparing cases with and without uniform agreement among the cytopathologists followed by logistic regression with backward elimination to model likelihood of uniform agreement. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included (49 % males, mean age 64 years, mean lesion size 26 mm). IOA for final diagnosis was moderate (κ = 0.45, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4 – 0.49) with minimal improvement when combining suspicious and malignant diagnoses (κ = 0.54, 95 %CI 0.49 – 0.6). The weighted kappa value for overall diagnosis was 0.65 (95 %CI 0.54 – 0.76). IOA was slight to fair (κ = 0.04 – 0.32) for individual cytologic parameters. A final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the most significant predictor of agreement [OR 3.99 (CI 1.52 – 10.49)]. Conclusions: Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists for pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens is moderate-substantial for the final cytologic diagnosis. The final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the strongest predictor of agreement. These results have significant implications for patient management and need to be validated in future trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4993880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49938802016-08-23 Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens Mounzer, Rawad Yen, Roy Marshall, Carrie Sams, Sharon Mehrotra, Sanjana Said, Mohamed Sherif Obuch, Joshua C. Brauer, Brian Attwell, Augustin Fukami, Norio Shah, Raj Amateau, Stuart Hall, Matthew Hosford, Lindsay Wilson, Robert Rastogi, Amit Wani, Sachin Endosc Int Open Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed to evaluate IOA among cytopathologists in assessing EUS-FNA cytology specimens of solid pancreatic lesions using a novel standardized scoring system and to assess individual clinical and cytologic predictors of IOA. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary care referral center were included. EUS-FNA slides were evaluated by four blinded cytopathologists using a standardized scoring system that assessed final cytologic diagnosis and quantitative (number of nucleated/diagnostic cells) and qualitative (bloodiness, inflammation/necrosis, contamination, artifact) cytologic parameters. Final clinical diagnosis was based on final cytology, surgical pathology, or 1-year clinical follow-up. IOA was calculated using multi-rater kappa (κ) statistics. Bivariate analyses were performed comparing cases with and without uniform agreement among the cytopathologists followed by logistic regression with backward elimination to model likelihood of uniform agreement. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included (49 % males, mean age 64 years, mean lesion size 26 mm). IOA for final diagnosis was moderate (κ = 0.45, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4 – 0.49) with minimal improvement when combining suspicious and malignant diagnoses (κ = 0.54, 95 %CI 0.49 – 0.6). The weighted kappa value for overall diagnosis was 0.65 (95 %CI 0.54 – 0.76). IOA was slight to fair (κ = 0.04 – 0.32) for individual cytologic parameters. A final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the most significant predictor of agreement [OR 3.99 (CI 1.52 – 10.49)]. Conclusions: Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists for pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens is moderate-substantial for the final cytologic diagnosis. The final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the strongest predictor of agreement. These results have significant implications for patient management and need to be validated in future trials. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-07 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4993880/ /pubmed/27556103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108188 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Mounzer, Rawad Yen, Roy Marshall, Carrie Sams, Sharon Mehrotra, Sanjana Said, Mohamed Sherif Obuch, Joshua C. Brauer, Brian Attwell, Augustin Fukami, Norio Shah, Raj Amateau, Stuart Hall, Matthew Hosford, Lindsay Wilson, Robert Rastogi, Amit Wani, Sachin Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens |
title | Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
|
title_full | Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
|
title_fullStr | Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
|
title_full_unstemmed | Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
|
title_short | Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
|
title_sort | interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mounzerrawad interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT yenroy interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT marshallcarrie interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT samssharon interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT mehrotrasanjana interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT saidmohamedsherif interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT obuchjoshuac interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT brauerbrian interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT attwellaugustin interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT fukaminorio interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT shahraj interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT amateaustuart interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT hallmatthew interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT hosfordlindsay interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT wilsonrobert interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT rastogiamit interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens AT wanisachin interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens |