Cargando…

Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mounzer, Rawad, Yen, Roy, Marshall, Carrie, Sams, Sharon, Mehrotra, Sanjana, Said, Mohamed Sherif, Obuch, Joshua C., Brauer, Brian, Attwell, Augustin, Fukami, Norio, Shah, Raj, Amateau, Stuart, Hall, Matthew, Hosford, Lindsay, Wilson, Robert, Rastogi, Amit, Wani, Sachin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108188
_version_ 1782449213444980736
author Mounzer, Rawad
Yen, Roy
Marshall, Carrie
Sams, Sharon
Mehrotra, Sanjana
Said, Mohamed Sherif
Obuch, Joshua C.
Brauer, Brian
Attwell, Augustin
Fukami, Norio
Shah, Raj
Amateau, Stuart
Hall, Matthew
Hosford, Lindsay
Wilson, Robert
Rastogi, Amit
Wani, Sachin
author_facet Mounzer, Rawad
Yen, Roy
Marshall, Carrie
Sams, Sharon
Mehrotra, Sanjana
Said, Mohamed Sherif
Obuch, Joshua C.
Brauer, Brian
Attwell, Augustin
Fukami, Norio
Shah, Raj
Amateau, Stuart
Hall, Matthew
Hosford, Lindsay
Wilson, Robert
Rastogi, Amit
Wani, Sachin
author_sort Mounzer, Rawad
collection PubMed
description Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed to evaluate IOA among cytopathologists in assessing EUS-FNA cytology specimens of solid pancreatic lesions using a novel standardized scoring system and to assess individual clinical and cytologic predictors of IOA. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary care referral center were included. EUS-FNA slides were evaluated by four blinded cytopathologists using a standardized scoring system that assessed final cytologic diagnosis and quantitative (number of nucleated/diagnostic cells) and qualitative (bloodiness, inflammation/necrosis, contamination, artifact) cytologic parameters. Final clinical diagnosis was based on final cytology, surgical pathology, or 1-year clinical follow-up. IOA was calculated using multi-rater kappa (κ) statistics. Bivariate analyses were performed comparing cases with and without uniform agreement among the cytopathologists followed by logistic regression with backward elimination to model likelihood of uniform agreement. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included (49 % males, mean age 64 years, mean lesion size 26 mm). IOA for final diagnosis was moderate (κ = 0.45, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4 – 0.49) with minimal improvement when combining suspicious and malignant diagnoses (κ = 0.54, 95 %CI 0.49 – 0.6). The weighted kappa value for overall diagnosis was 0.65 (95 %CI 0.54 – 0.76). IOA was slight to fair (κ = 0.04 – 0.32) for individual cytologic parameters. A final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the most significant predictor of agreement [OR 3.99 (CI 1.52 – 10.49)]. Conclusions: Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists for pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens is moderate-substantial for the final cytologic diagnosis. The final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the strongest predictor of agreement. These results have significant implications for patient management and need to be validated in future trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4993880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49938802016-08-23 Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens Mounzer, Rawad Yen, Roy Marshall, Carrie Sams, Sharon Mehrotra, Sanjana Said, Mohamed Sherif Obuch, Joshua C. Brauer, Brian Attwell, Augustin Fukami, Norio Shah, Raj Amateau, Stuart Hall, Matthew Hosford, Lindsay Wilson, Robert Rastogi, Amit Wani, Sachin Endosc Int Open Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed to evaluate IOA among cytopathologists in assessing EUS-FNA cytology specimens of solid pancreatic lesions using a novel standardized scoring system and to assess individual clinical and cytologic predictors of IOA. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary care referral center were included. EUS-FNA slides were evaluated by four blinded cytopathologists using a standardized scoring system that assessed final cytologic diagnosis and quantitative (number of nucleated/diagnostic cells) and qualitative (bloodiness, inflammation/necrosis, contamination, artifact) cytologic parameters. Final clinical diagnosis was based on final cytology, surgical pathology, or 1-year clinical follow-up. IOA was calculated using multi-rater kappa (κ) statistics. Bivariate analyses were performed comparing cases with and without uniform agreement among the cytopathologists followed by logistic regression with backward elimination to model likelihood of uniform agreement. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included (49 % males, mean age 64 years, mean lesion size 26 mm). IOA for final diagnosis was moderate (κ = 0.45, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4 – 0.49) with minimal improvement when combining suspicious and malignant diagnoses (κ = 0.54, 95 %CI 0.49 – 0.6). The weighted kappa value for overall diagnosis was 0.65 (95 %CI 0.54 – 0.76). IOA was slight to fair (κ = 0.04 – 0.32) for individual cytologic parameters. A final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the most significant predictor of agreement [OR 3.99 (CI 1.52 – 10.49)]. Conclusions: Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists for pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens is moderate-substantial for the final cytologic diagnosis. The final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the strongest predictor of agreement. These results have significant implications for patient management and need to be validated in future trials. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-07 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4993880/ /pubmed/27556103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108188 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Mounzer, Rawad
Yen, Roy
Marshall, Carrie
Sams, Sharon
Mehrotra, Sanjana
Said, Mohamed Sherif
Obuch, Joshua C.
Brauer, Brian
Attwell, Augustin
Fukami, Norio
Shah, Raj
Amateau, Stuart
Hall, Matthew
Hosford, Lindsay
Wilson, Robert
Rastogi, Amit
Wani, Sachin
Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
title Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
title_full Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
title_fullStr Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
title_short Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
title_sort interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4993880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108188
work_keys_str_mv AT mounzerrawad interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT yenroy interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT marshallcarrie interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT samssharon interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT mehrotrasanjana interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT saidmohamedsherif interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT obuchjoshuac interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT brauerbrian interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT attwellaugustin interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT fukaminorio interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT shahraj interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT amateaustuart interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT hallmatthew interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT hosfordlindsay interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT wilsonrobert interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT rastogiamit interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens
AT wanisachin interobserveragreementamongcytopathologistsintheevaluationofpancreaticendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyspecimens